Important- new stuff!

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Yahoo Group (Old Posts)
1

List Members-

This news from Rusty is incredible. Rusty is the one with the suncruiser
links on my site. HugeDomains.com

I read The MilleniumGroup's stuff oncomets- good stuff.

Do read this below and remember some of those suncruiser pics which I have
up, especially the one about theSuntaking a " hit."

DD

Subject: Re: The far side of the sun

Some scientist I am acquainted with out in California have something
similar
they think. Their group is the Millenium Group. They have some very fine
articles about it and a n object they cll "Orca" . The URL is
Megajudi303 Link Situs Game Online Anti Zonk 2026

I think you should read their stuff. Also i figure you are aware that
they
blew a large part of the sun away ? I am enclosing the article I have on
it. They say the sun went to "half-life" after it happened.

Here is the article: It is correspondence between Kent Steadman and
someone
else. Rusty

MARK: It's amazing to me that this bit of "on-going" NEWS was NOT
made public LOOOONG ago. Ob1

On Jan 12th, 1962, the SUN went "half-life" (equal helium/hydrogen)

and also lost its' Polarity as well. (Suspected) Almost immediately,
A Newly formed NASA contracted Martin Marietta to make a "quickee"
SKYLAB out of some Missile parts. It had many problems but each was
solved in its own time by clever Engineers in the program,
(ME included). The "happening" was held "TOP SECRET" for nearly 30
years thence.

In Sept, first Friday, of 1972, it was noted that over 2/3rds of

the SUN's Mantel Blew away on the reverse side. Later featured in
Nat'l Geographic in about '78 or so. Had WE been on that side of
the SUN at the time...who knows WHAT may of happened. It also
knocked out TV for about two days. Since I had been installing
"MINI"-TV cable systems in the Sierras north of L.A., I received
MANY calls about it. (Week-end extra-income type thing) L O L!!

Many articles were printed, including Readers Digest about the

UN-usual 30 yr Warming Period around 1990 or so. It was attributed
to Chemical imbalances such as Freon, Carbon-dioxide, etc. BIG
"B.S.!!!" The UV patterns of the SUN were soaring out of even
previous BLU limits. The entire HEAT and Light curve was totally
changed and the HEAT Indexes followed asymptotically. Weather
patterns including NEW types of Ninyo/Ninya patterns also developed
over longer periods of time.

Finally in 1991, the whole Hydrogen mantle was completely

dissipated and a NEW and HOTTER YET SUN sported an entirely Helium
Atmosphere...the SUN had gone: "Variable"! (many such stars exist
within 15 Lt. Yrs...including Eridanus "Delta") Un-predictability
was the NORM. NASA sent up several Satellites but the most
controversial one was the Plutonium-powered Ullyses that reached
SUN in early in NOV 1997.

WHen Ullyses reach orbital stability around the SUN, things began

to happen. (I was retired by then), Ullyses verified the fact that
the SUN had NO polarity and had also analysed its chemical make-up
as being ALL HELIUM, and that it had NO polarity as well as the
"S" meters aboard measured equal Gaussian activity from top to
botom. (NASA WEB SITE INFO) THEN, Just a short time later, within
10 days or less, SOHO caught an amazing sequence:
(Contact Kent Steadman "CC" at Email noted.) A HUGE SPACE-SHIP
came toward the SUN and at the apex of the travel trajectory curve,
it delivered two "VENUS-SIZED" Cosmic Bombs into the SUN causing
two sequential explosions from deep inside the SUN. NASA LIED:
"Two Comets slam into the SUN"...yeah, RIGHT...NOT!!!

Those who were watchng the SOHO PIX were astounded and exclaimed:

"What are they trying to do, Blow up our SUN???" I watched this and
hoped that NASA would "chime-in" and say something. As the UNrest
grew, I decided to Open Pandora's BOX and let some really TOP SECRET
info go that I had been part of in 1952. I explained simply that an
"HELIUM" Bomb was used to cause a chain-reaction down into the many
Hydrogen types between H2 and He. This would indeed "retro-fit" the
Atmosphere of the SUN into a more acceptable "LAST" sequence that
may last as much as a millenium or so; a "DANGEROUS" Experiment
at best. A Cosmic BOMB is indeed a "Planet-Buster"!!! When Kennedy
said He was NOT worried about the Cuban Missile crisis in 1962,
he KNEW what he was saying!!!

The perpetrators must have known, that had they NOT done this,

the SUN would have become NOVA in a short while. Other reasons are
NOT clear but one may extrapolate several reasons including take-over
of the EARTH to MINE what was left of its huge Mineral supply.
This would make sense to me, at any rate...although pure
expostulation! There have already been two SPACE WARS inside our
OWN Solar SYSTEM. One in Sept of 1997 and one NOW on-going the
other side of Jupiter since June 8th. The latter has been and
still IS a "BLOODY" one!

Well..Mark, there you have from beginning to the present. The

WEATHER patterns NOW may be a bit more normal considering the SUN's
NEW condition, let's hope so. Ob1

Related thread: Suncruiser material in New site — Further suncruiser material from Rusty (June 2001)

2

Dean (from Dick).... I did read the article below. Also some of the other material on the Millennium Group website. Does Rusty (or you) know this Kent Steadman? Have his prior science pronouncements proven out? Despite the involved science experience background he hints at, I have giant doubts about what he has written in the following. Haven't you?
I extracted Steadman's highlights; In 1962, then 1972 and in 1991, our Sun was altered: A large part of the Sun was blown away... The sun went "half-life" after it happened... 2/3rds of the SUN'S Mantel Blew away on the reverse side... Then the whole Hydrogen mantle was completely dissipated and a NEW and HOTTER YET SUN sported an entirely Helium Atmosphere... By 1997 NASA analyzed the Sun's chemical makeup and found it to be ALL HELIUM... Then A HUGE SPACESHIP delivered two "VENUS-SIZED" Cosmic Bombs into the SUN. If they had not, the SUN would have become NOVA in a short while, speculated Steadman.... There have been two SPACE WARS inside our OWN Solar SYSTEM in 1997 and one NOW on-going the other side of Jupiter since June 8th... still IS a "BLOODY" one!... But he comments the SUN'S NEW condition (after being blasted into a pure Helium atmosphere) may NOW give us more normal WEATHER patterns.
Thank you, Steadman! That last part makes me feel much better!

I've been around since long before 1962. I don't remember the his described vast changes in the Sun that WOULD SURELY HAVE affected our Earth. Was I sleeping?

Where is all the VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE to even vaguely support what Steadman claims are FACTS? Our government can't even land a probe on Mars. During the bombing of Iraq, the GAO reported after that our super-technology guided laser bombs missed their targets over 90% of the time. They had to resort to world war 2 "dumb bombs." You know what happened in Yugoslavia; our technology missed target after target and our advanced instruments from 15,000 feet up couldn't tell the difference between real tanks and cardboard ones.

But NASA, the "nudge" the earth people, with their similar instruments, can accurately tell us EVERYTING about the SUN, the writer would have us believe. And our technically advanced government (presuming it is us) is carrying on space wars (with whom?) on the other side of Jupiter. Or is the writer getting this incredible tale from inside his own "universe," his imagination? If we believe this stuff, shouldn't we all drop our other interests, including HE research, and concentrate on what Steadman is relating? What could be more important? "Nudging" the earth is nothing. Our scientists - and those guys with the "Venus-sized" Cosmic Bombs, engaged in their space wars, may accidentally or intentionally blow our Sun to bits, and Earth along with it!

Or is the CIA behind Steadman, feeding out fantasy disinformation that will cause the entire field we're all studying, seem like a looney bin? Sorry, Dean and Rusty, the stuff written below doesn't ring true to me. What do you know that supports Steadman?

  • Dick Fojut
3

Dick,

Kent has a site up. he is one of these guys who processes images of
the surface of Mars. He came up with one which is very interesting,
he calls it Lake Steadman after his dad. ( Can´t beat that, can
you? )

I know that he is on the Anomalous-Images list, I´ll try to find his
site or that pic later on.

The whole suncruiser theme has to do with huge mother ships which
have been picked out of processed images of the sun, mostly from the
Soho satellite. If you go to my suncruiser site, you will immediately
see the links on the left to Rusy´s site. Mine is just a sampler. I
try to point out some stark correlations between these mother ships
and certain Puranic descriptions, but Rusty´s site has a plethora of
images. They were done by Jose Guerra, who has a site up in
Portuguese. ( Stick with Rusty, Portuguese can kill you worse than
latin )

My suncruiser site with the links-

The suncruiser business is like a lot of alternative internet stuff,
unfortunately, it requires a bit of time to investigate, However, it
could be one of the most significant things happening.

By the way, nobody is saying that OUR government landed any bombs or
anything into the sun. Reading on I see that you got that impression.
The photos are of the suncruisers, and they are extraterrestrial.

I wouldn´t say that the nature of the sun hasn´t changed. Weather has
sure gone haywire lately, and how do we know if all this baloney
about cycles accounts for it?

I can´t swear on the information, though, it is there for you to take
or to leave. The suncruiser phenomenon, however, seems to be real and
to have validation which isn´t oversimplistic or anything.

Later,

Dharma/Dean

4

Dick,

About that coversation between Steadman and this guy mark, which
Rusty passed on to us- You know, Mark mentioned that the fact that
the mantle of the Sun " blew away," i.e., experienced some change,
was mentioned in a mainstream article.

I think that the only occult part of all this was the cause to which
the fact was attributed, or better said, not attributed. Nobody in
NASA told The National Geographic that this was due to huge mother
ships messing about the sun.

And the fact that the nature of the Sun´s makeup changed, that the
helium and hydrogen equalled out, is not impossible. Cater mentions
huge motherships being able to manipulate planets. When you
understand that gravity is an electrostatic force, then huge ships
which can generate such charges might be able to influence orbits and
such. And if the " mix " changed from more hydrogen to less hydrogen
and more helium, then what would the result be? Just that the Sun
would burn a bit differently, which we are maybe experiencing now.

I don´t want to swear by all this, I just want people to keep an open
mind. Suncruisers seem to be real, though.

The Puranic literature tells about life " within " the sun globe,
which seems to suggest a hollow world. Some pictures show a slight
flattening around the Polar surface of the sun, and a discoloration,
which reinforces the idea of polar openings or depressions indicative
of hollow configurations.

Later,

DD

5

From " You Could Learn a Lot from a Daitya "

Another phenomenon which The Man reported was an all-pervading
luminosity at great depths below the surface of the Earth. The Man
reported that a gray haze began to appear, followed further down by a
more localized luminosity immediately about him, followed yet further
by a fully illuminating soft light. His guide explained the nature
of the light very well, yet simply, by asking rhetorically about the
fact that the Earth receives more light from the Sun than the Earth
radiates back out, and whether The Man really thought that the Earths
shell were an obstacle for the passage of the Suns energy? The guide
went on to state that Sun´s radiation seeps through the Earth as a
fluid and returns to the Sun not discernible by man. He suggested
that the majority of light and heat which we experience are the
results of local reactions within the Earths atmosphere and the globe
itself. He hinted at the nature of the mechanism by referring to a
flood of darkness at that depth which became revivified, then made
apparent to mortal eyes, and by saying about his own visual
perception that " darkness touches on my nerves."

It is fine if the faithful accept the testimony offered by the book,
but it would be nice to have some reasoning to go on because this
business of light and heat being created in the atmosphere of the
Earth, then darkness in the initial portion of the crust, then light
created again in the deeper shell, is not easly understandable. It is
here that Mr. Cater´s application of soft particle physics comes to
the rescue. Mr. Cater explains: " The visible photon radiation from
the sun is scattered and quickly dispersed, or recombines to form
soft particles, after it reaches the surface of the Earth. The soft
particles continue on and penetrate below the surface. During this
process, soft particles are continually breaking up with the
formation of new particles, generally of a softer nature. Some of the
photons released recombine with others to form new particles. ... The
energies radiated from the sun are continuously transformed into
lower frequencies, as they penetrate deeper into the earth. In this
manner, nearly all the original ultraviolet is transformed into lower
frequency radiation by the time it penetrates the shell of the
earth. "

In the Eighteen chapter of the book, Mr. Cater also points out that "
Chemical changes are expedited during the disintegration of soft
electrons when they release great quantities of hard electrons." this
accounts for the phenomenon of warmth in the depths below. Soft
particles do dininterate on their way down due to friction.

It is only natural that photons will form into particles and have
further effects, but science does not recognize this fact. When we do
consider soft particles, however, we can easily and congruently
account for geological functions which currently do not have a good
explanation, especially given a hollow configuration. Taking soft
particles into consideration, a hollow configuration becomes easy to
justify.

That soft particles would be particularly penetrating isn´t hard to
understand. As they continuously break up and re-combine, their
frequency is going to slow down. As they achieve frequencies which
vary from the frequencies of matter with which we are familiar, the
soft particle passes through ,ore easily because frequencies which
widely differ do not impede each other.

Later,

Dharma/Dean

6

From Dick: NASA has marvelous instruments, so accurate - and none of their deductions are ASSUMPTIONS? Rememeber, Pratt mentions science's ASSUMPTIONS while interpreting instrumental seismic readings about what is inside earth's crust.

  • Dick

From Dick: Whoa, Dean! Is Cater ALSO some super clairvoyant? Or in intimate touch with extraterrestrials who give him info? That's the "kind" of revelation I've heard and read being mouthed by psychics and UFO Contactees for decades, true or false. Metaphysical, not science provable in nature. Does he put things like that in his book? Thought he stuck to straight, evidential scientific proofs. I have all sorts of (unprovable in the real world) concepts of my own and have read many others such as in the Serth books, but I would never pretend to state them as FACTS. "Huge Mother Ships!" Wow!
Is Cater's clairvoyance where he discovered our Sun is a binary (as you once wrote me) with ANOTHER Sun opposite top us (and thus unseen) which is influencing or controlling our visible Sun's rotation and orbit, and etc.? You mentioned that binary setup after I wrote that Churchward said our Sun orbits around and is rotated on its axis by controlling magnetic forces from its SUPERIOR Sun.

Churchward believed our Sun's superior Sun is an unmeasurable distance away and possibly also controlling most of the other suns we see - and possessing magnetic forces so immense, light rays cannot escape, making it "invisible" to our vision. A great "black" body. Your comment about Cater's binary sun belief was obviously meant to denigrate the Churchward explanation of our Sun having a distant superior Sun as controller. You apparently cannot accept the idea that a magnetic body, (Suns or Stars) with their centrifugal, repelling forces and magnetic pulling forces can be causing their satellites to orbit in precise neutral zone distances and also be causing them to rotate on an axis. So I guess you can find no fault with NASA being able to "nudge" the earth. Big mother ships could imaginatively do that as well or better than an ordinary comet!

From Dick: Of course gravity is AT TIMES an electrostatic (electromagnetic) force, but NOT exclusively and NOT exclusively with the earth's source of magnetism of elements.

Huge ships generating such charges is imaginative speculation on yours or anyone's part. The Sun may not be and probably isn't "burning" at all. That's an earthly phenomenon when volatile gases combine with OXYGEN and become "analyzed" into their gaseous natures - FLAMES to our vision - as they temporarily SEPARATE into their basic elements of Hydrogen, Oxygen, etc.(releasing HEAT). Visible "Flames" or COMBUSTION isn't a "synthesizing" or combining of gases into NEW gases or compounds. It is a temporary SEPARATING into basic gaseous elements. Who contends that vast volumes of OXYGEN in the Sun are causing other gases to combine with the oxygen and literally "burn" up?

From Dick: I've heard of that too. But life or beings in or on the Sun's "surface" (inside or out) may be - but probably not in THIS gross physical dimension. Or is this a clairvoyant observation? - Dick

Later,

DD

7

Re: [allplanets-hollow] Dick, About that Steadman inf

From Dick: NASA has marvelous instruments, so accurate - and none of their deductions are ASSUMPTIONS? Rememeber, Pratt mentions science's ASSUMPTIONS while interpreting instrumental seismic readings about what is inside earth's crust.

  • Dick

  • Yo Dick,

  • You're right. These guys are speculating on the nature of the Sun's makeup, on the nature of changes. It is to be taken with a grain of salt.

  • I feel strongly about the suncruiser images, though.

I think that the only occult part of all this was the cause to which
the fact was attributed, or better said, not attributed. Nobody in
NASA told The National Geographic that this was due to huge mother
ships messing about the sun.

And the fact that the nature of the Sun´s makeup changed, that the
helium and hydrogen equalled out, is not impossible. Cater mentions
huge motherships being able to manipulate planets.

From Dick: Whoa, Dean! Is Cater ALSO some super clairvoyant? Or in intimate touch with extraterrestrials who give him info? That's the "kind" of revelation I've heard and read being mouthed by psychics and UFO Contactees for decades, true or false.

  • Dick,

  • Cater doesn't need to be a psychic to speak along these lines. Once you understand that the nature of gravity is electrostatic, it is not hard to imagine that some of these huge motherships could generate radiation that could interfere with a planet's gravity-inducing radiation and, in this way, manipulate the planet.

  • I imagine that life in the Sun would be on an ethereal platform, a soft particle platform, i.e., a light platform.

Dharma/Dean

8

Dick Fojut to Leslee and ALL...

Just checked out Leslee's website at below URL...

http://www.onelight.com/http://www.onelight.com/

Very nice web page. Very interesting reading!

We have accomplished gals like Leslee and Hazel - (and how many others?) who have abilities to perceive what is going on inside the HE. We should be asking each of them (and any who have clairvoyant abilities) to tell us what THEY'VE each discovered!

Doesn't mean we'll believe EVERYTHING they write. (We've all got our pre-conceptions, especially me... and Dean). But I would like to hear MORE from our more "gifted" members! Maybe some of them have MORE insight than Etidorhpa, Cater, Churchward and other respected writers, about the same subjects.

Please "speak up," you clairvoyant, remote-viewing, astral traveling psychic seer members. I for one, want to read more of what each of you think about the HE, today's science, etc., etc., and whatever else you've perceived that you think the members may appreciate hearing about!

  • Dick
9

Dick,
It is coming. This week.
Greg

Owner