[HollowEarthMystical] New Martian Polar Anomaly?

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Yahoo Group (Old Posts)
1

Blake, I believe that the "pinnacles" or peaks of the "thin" objects are too
sharp to be dunes of any type, sand or snow. Also, the apparent "sharpness"
of the tips wouldn't happen in a windy environment (look at the dune-like
formations at the bottom of the picture, which actually are dunes, without
the needle-thin "peaks" and the vapor-trails--what you are seeing as
shadows). In other words, real and identifiable "dunes" are visible in the
same terrain, and while possibly created in part from some sort of
wind-blown deposits, these are definitely different in structure from the
many objects toward the top and middle of the scene....

I still see water or liquid columns and vapor....

--Mike

ยทยทยท

Message: 19
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:53:25 -0700
From: "Frei, Blake" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [HollowEarthMystical] New Martian Polar Anomaly?

Mike,

As much as I'd love to see geysers on Mars, I think this is an optical
illusion. Those are long shadows cast by drifts of sand dunes. The angle of
the shadow make them look vertical but they are actually horizontal. The sun
must be low on the horizon in this photo. Anyone agree?

It does stir up some other thoughts, though. If they are sand dunes (maybe
snow drifts?), then that does suggest high winds or water or both.

Blake

2

Blake,

About those Mars pics- I think that they really could be geysers. The spray
seems to open up at the top, where the spray dissipates. A construction
would tend to come to a point, but in the pic, the upper portion seems to
open up into a spray.

By the way, I put the image up on my site- it is the last image down.

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index15.html

Dharma/Dean

3

Did you all know that NOAA now has an animation of the aurora, so that you
can watch it circle around?

http://sec.noaa.gov/pmap/index.html

Dharma/Dean

4

Members,

On April 20, 1914, Admiral MacMillan and his expedition of four set out from
Cape Thomas Hubbard, the Northernmost point of Canada, adjacent to
Greenland. They went Northwest in search of the Mirage that they had seen,
and which had originally been seen by Admiral Peary.

The description, from Four Years in the White North, is in the attachments-
I forgot the last page, so I did it in two parts.

Against a clear, blue sky they saw a mountain, not an ice mountain, but an
ice-capped mountain. What was seen was a mirage- mirages are reflections of
real things that exist, so it wasn't an illusion.

Mirages can travel great distances through thermal strata of air. Since the
mirage had its origin in the funnel-like opening to the hollow portion, it
could have originated a few hundred miles away, on the other side of the
basin, closer to where Nansen had his experiences. From the point of land
from which they left, they originally had calculated the distance to be
30-some miles. They had certainly trekked over 130 miles before they turned
back, and still hadn't reached the source. If the air strata carrying the
reflection is warmer than the Arctic air, as air coming out of the opening
should be, then it will travel up and over the Arctic air and travel quite a
distance before touching down.

Anyway, the mirage seen by Peary, MacMillan and Cook, all at different
times, is very important to the body of HE evidence. You just don't find
mountains, which are only snowy at the peak, a couple of hundred miles from
the North Pole. The origin must be that area above the New Siberian Islands.

Anyway, look over the attachement, it is only three pages long.

Dharma/Dean