Hey Let's Throw an Asteroid at Earth & See What Happens

Hey Let's Throw an Asteroid at Earth and See What Happens...06/13/01
by Mitch Battros (ECTV)
No this is not a joke. Nasa has seriously brought this up as a true option to defend against 'Global Warming'. Remember folks, we pay these people. How would you like one day to find out our President has ordered Nasa to navigate a large comet our way to help 'nudge' Earth a bit out of its orbit? Sound crazy? Yes, I would think so. Just think of many missions to Mars and other planets, where Nasa "just missed". Or how many space shuttle flights were canceled at the last second. Unfortunately some were not canceled with tragic results. When this occurs, what is their typical answer "We're not sure just what happened".

Call me crazy, but this seems like a very bad idea. mb

Nasa aims to move Earth
Robin McKie - The Observer

Scientists have found an unusual way to prevent our planet overheating: move it to a cooler spot. All you have to do is hurtle a few comets at Earth, and its orbit will be altered. Our world will then be sent spinning into a safer, colder part of the solar system.

This startling idea of improving our interplanetary neighbourhood is the brainchild of a group of Nasa engineers and American astronomers who say their plan could add another six billion years to the useful lifetime of our planet - effectively doubling its working life.

'The technology is not at all far-fetched,' said Dr Greg Laughlin, of the Nasa Ames Research Center in California. 'It involves the same techniques that people now suggest could be used to deflect asteroids or comets heading towards Earth. We don't need raw power to move Earth, we just require delicacy of planning and manoeuvring.'

The plan put forward by Dr Laughlin, and his colleagues Don Korycansky and Fred Adams, involves carefully directing a comet or asteroid so that it sweeps close past our planet and transfers some of its gravitational energy to Earth. 'Earth's orbital speed would increase as a result and we would move to a higher orbit away from the Sun,' Laughlin said. Engineers would then direct their comet so that it passed close to Jupiter or Saturn, where the reverse process would occur. It would pick up energy from one of these giant planets. Later its orbit would bring it back to Earth, and the process would be repeated.

In the short term, the plan provides an ideal solution to global warming, although the team was actually concerned with a more drastic danger. The sun is destined to heat up in about a billion years and so 'seriously compromise' our biosphere - by frying us. Hence the group's decision to try to save Earth. 'All you have to do is strap a chemical rocket to an asteroid or comet and fire it at just the right time,' added Laughlin. 'It isbasic rocket science.'

The plan has one or two worrying aspects, however. For a start, space engineers would have to be very careful about how they directed their asteroid or comet towards Earth. The slightest miscalculation in orbit could fire it straight at Earth - with devastating consequences.

It is a point acknowledged by the group. 'The collision of a 100-kilometre diameter object with the Earth at cosmic velocity would sterilise the biosphere most effectively, at least to the level of bacteria,' they state in a paper in Astrophysics and Space Science. 'The danger cannot be overemphasised.'

There is also the vexed question of the Moon. As the current issue of Scientific American points out, if Earth was pushed out of its current position it is 'most likely the Moon would be stripped away from Earth,' it states, radically upsetting out planet's climate.

These criticisms are accepted by the scientists. 'Our investigation has shown just how delicately Earth is poised within the solar system,' Laughlin admitted. 'Nevertheless, our work has practical implications. Our calculations show that to get Earth to a safer, distant orbit, it would have to pass through unstable zones and would need careful nurturing and nudging. Any alien astronomers observing our solar system would know that something odd had occurred, and would realise an intelligent lifeform was responsible.

'And the same goes for us. When we look at other solar systems, and detect planets around other suns - which we are now beginning to do - we may see that planet-moving has occurred. It will give us our first evidence of the handiwork of extraterrestrial beings.'
_______________________________________

Leslee, These people who govern us are clearly insane. They must have made Alternative (3) arrangements for themselves if they are seriously prepared to hurl an asteroid at Earth. Hazel

Hazel,

I do believe you are correct when you mention insanity. Maybe all of us here should run NASA for a change.....they could give us a trial of one year......wouldn't that be cool. Of course, we should have complete access to all their files. But, on a more serious note---they have got to be kidding???? A little nudge to the right........whoa, I don't know, hope I'm not here when they try it, and someday, I am sure they will.

Leslee

Leslee and all...
I was astounded when I heard the story you listed below, on network TV! These are expert scientists with NASA. They can plot a trajectory for rockets to move through the solar system, yet they seem totally IGNORANT about WHY and HOW planets orbit around the Sun.

I am astounded that they (plus NASA's top people and unnamed "astronomers") BELIEVE earth's orbit and distance from the Sun is some sort of mysterious accidental arrangement. Clearly, these respected and highly paid NASA experts have revealed they are fundamentally STUPID about the Sun and why planets orbit the Sun at different distances.

It is IMPOSSIBLE to "nudge" the earth into a different orbit and distance from the Sun. WHY? Because, depending on the MAGNETIC CAPACITY of each planet (the volume of magnetic forces stored in its crust), each planet is held in a precise NEUTRAL zone orbit around the Sun. The precise neutral zone is at that distance where our Sun's magnetic and centrifugal forces cancel each other. At that neutral zone, each satellite can be thrown out no further by the Sun's centrifugal force, prevented by the Sun's magnetic pull. And the Sun's magnetic force cannot pull the satellite into the Sun, countermanded by the Sun's centrifugal force. It is a CHECKMATE of antagonistic forces, forming a neutral zone of orbit.

Don't know Cater's view about this, but I suspect David Pratt is also astounded

  • and laughing - as would James Churchward, if he were still alive.

Just days ago I related, from Churchward, why the solar system's planets are in precise and separate orbits around the Sun. And remember, he says these are not HIS ideas. If we can believe him, he had simply rediscovered the scientific knowledge known well to earth's ancient scientists 70,000 years back. And still known by some 3,000 years ago, but subsequently forgotten...

According to Churchward, each orbiting body has a different magnetic capacity. A planet's CRUST is its "storage house," its "battery." The planet's forces, including all electromagnetic forces, saturate its crust, held close by its "central" magnet (deep in the crust), until called forth by nature to carry out their duties on the surface and in the atmosphere.

The THICKNESS and DENSITY of each planet's hard outside crust (for its size) indicates its magnetic capacity. The thicker and denser the crust, the greater the volume of forces stored in the crust, the greater its magnetic power. The greater its magnetic capacity, stored in its crust, the closer it will orbit the Sun. The following are quotations from Churchward's chapter on the SUN, out of context, but I think sufficient to paint a picture and explain why it is impossible for the child minds at NASA to "nudge" the earth into a different orbit...

Churchward: "For the sun to carry the earth around herself in an orbit, four separate and distinct forces are required.

Three of these must emanate from the sun, and One from the earth.
The four forces are:
A sun's propellent force to carry the earth along in her orbit.
A sun's repellent force to prevent the earth from being drawn into the sun.
A sun's magnetic force to prevent the repellent force from carrying the earth out into space.
An earthly magnetic force or forces that are affinitive to the sun's propellent and magnetic forces.

It may involve two earthly magnetic forces or only one, I cannot say.

I have heretofore shown that all these forces exist. Two of the sun's forces, the magnetic and repellent, must form a neutral zone. The repellent force at the sun's surface must be stronger than the magnetic force, and from the sun's surface must diminish in strength as it works out into space. The magnetic must be weaker at the sun's surface than the repellent and also diminish in strength as it moves out into space, but the rate at which its power diminishes must be much slower than that of the repellent; then, at a given point dependent on the magnetic capacity of the planet, a neutral zone will be formed, from which she cannot stray.

Each of the planets has a different magnetic capacity. Therefore, as their magnetism differs, so must their neutral zones differ in distance from the sun. Thus it is shown why Mercury is so close to the sun and Neptune so far away as to be out of sight.

Apparently, I cannot say it authoritatively, the magnetic capacity is governed by density. If our scientists are correct in their assertions about the densities of the planets, the planet nearest to the sun is the densest and the farthest one away the least dense of all."
---------------------
More from Churchward.... "NEUTRAL ZONES.
The neutral zones of the earth and planets are shown in the diagram of the solar system, page 188 (not shown) as circles parallel to the sun with a planet on each circle. The neutral zone of a satellite is governed by her magnetic capacity. Her magnetic capacity in turn is governed by the elements composing the body, the thickness of the crust, and the general density. This is fully verified by the bodies composing the solar system.

The higher or greater the magnetic capacity of a planet is, the nearer will be her neutral zone to the sun, and the body with the lowest magnetic capacity will have its neutral zone the farthest away from the sun.

A body, when given an impetus by a temporary force, flies forward, commencing in a straight line, and continues on in this straight line until some magnetic force attracts it, and eventually stops it having overcome a temporary force. Then the magnetic force claims the body. If, however, the propellent force is not of a temporary character, and of a circular movement, with sufficiently strong centrifugal and magnetic forces governing it, so as to form a neutral zone, then the flight must be everlasting."
----------------------
More from Churchward...
"The earth and planets can be carried out by the sun's centrifugal force just so far and no further. They are compelled each and all to remain in their neutral zones. For at the distance from the sun at which they are placed, the sun's magnetic force is holding them against the sun's centrifugal force. Neither the earth or any of the planets can be drawn into the sun, for, within their neutral zones, the sun's repellent force is stronger than the magnetic, and prevents their nearer approach to the sun.

The earth and each of the planets have their own separate degrees of magnetic capacity, and all being different, no two have the same neutral zone. Therefore they cannot collide with each other.

To have two planets occupying the same neutral zone, it would be necessary to have the two bodies of identically the same size, composed of identically the same element, and in the same exact proportion one to the other, and with identically the same thickness of crust. Otherwise, their magnetic capacity would not be the same; not being the same, it is impossible for them to have the same neutral zone."
------------------------
And this last part from Churchward (some of which you may disagree with)...

"DEDUCTIONS.
All forces connected with the earth's circuit around the sun are even and everlasting.
The earth cannot stop her flight around the sun as long as the sun continues to be a living body.

The earth cannot be drawn into the sun.
The earth cannot be hurled off into space.
The earth cannot collide with any other body.
Each body in the solar system has its neutral zone.
Each body in the universe has its neutral zone.
No two neutral zones cross each other.
No body can be drawn out of its neutral zone.
The sun has a hard crust and a soft center.
The sun is not committing slow suicide by burning up. The sun is a cool body.
The sun supplies no heat beyond her atmosphere.
A pole may be magnetized and de-magnetized many times during a circuit around the governing body.
I have very inadequately shown what the great Cosmic Forces are and their manner of working, but trust that at least some who read this work will find it sufficiently explicit to understand what I wish to convey." -- James Churchward.
----------------------
Whether you disagree with some of Churchward's above statements (or not), I think the preceding reveals someone with MORE understanding about the nature and functioning of our solar system, than the kindergarten theorists currently inhabiting the funny farm called NASA, who want to "nudge" earth into a different orbit. I'm throwing up again!

  • Dick Fojut

If I worked for NASA in Public Relations, and I didn't want folks getting
upset about future predicted scary comet activity coming right at us; it
would pop into my mind to tell everyone how we have all this stuff under
control - diverting the trajectory, moving planets, whatever it takes.
Advertising may not be able to fool all of the people all of the time, but it
can fool all of the people some of the time. Like now.

If the status quo is not maintained right up until the end, the wealthy
people might take it into their minds to liquidate their assets, pack up all
their jewelry and charter jets to dive into one of the polar openings for
safety, which would upset our economy. And the middle class people might
decide to call in sick to work and take their families and a pickax to Mt.
Shasta or Everest or that Etidorhpa cave looking for a way inside to safety.
That would leave the jobless and homeless to keep the system running.

What I can't figure out is WHY the system needs to keep running til the last
moment. Evidently this is important to whatever wants to keep us ignorant.

Re: [allplanets-hollow] Hey Let's Throw an Asteroid at

Hi Dick and all--

What you wrote above is precisely why I posted what I did from Etidorhpa last night: Matter obeys Spirit! I remembered reading it after I read Machoarm's post about choosing to live within the Spirit, which in truth is the best place one can live, as there the vision is clean, the voice clear, completely void of material brainwashing. As Laura has suggested, advertising is the greatest form of both brainwashing and control.

We are an ignorant Nation Dick, and our ignorance will eventually be our demise. If only science could accept that there are invisible forces at work throughout all of the galaxy, and that we are all connected for a reason, then perhaps, if not already too late, the messes we make could be ratified.

But, science is an unfortunate lot, intent on debunking what they can not see, or prove--therefore, spirit means nothing to them. Most spend too much time relying on what has been "supposedly" proven by those scientists who traveled ahead of them, instead of reaching deep within their own creative intelligence, which by the way, is the spirit, and not in the logical aspect of the brain. We are at the hands of mad scientists--and I, for one, think that they should throw their books away, along with their degrees and practice a bit if humility, we would all be the better for it.

Thanks for both yours and Laura's insight.

Leslee