Last November I started corresponding with Dr. Fran DeAquino regarding
his theory of gravitational shielding. Having a degree in Nuclear
Engineering and an advanced degree in Electrical Engineering, Fran's
theory caught my attention because:1. It is derived from an experimentally verified theory of gravity
shielding
based on thermal radiation,
The above has caught my eye; I am relating the idea of gravity/antigravity
to a thermal source, to a few things that I have read in Joseph H. Cater's
book. Cater ascribes gravity to electrostatic charges, and explains how they
come about, that the radiations which cause gravity are low frequency and
invisible, and that they come to be so through a process of redistribution
of frequency of the Sun's rays, mostly.
He says that:
" The greatest contributing factor to Earth and Moon gravity is the
tranformation of radiation resulting from the thermal agitation of atoms and
molecules. The particles resulting from this activity are comprised of lower
frequency photons. Such radiation is more readily transformed into
gravity-inducing radiations, because it is closer to this frequency band to
begin with. A significant portion of such radiation, originating miles below
the surface, is transformed into gravity-producing energies by the time it
reaches the surface."
He explains that other soft particles ( low frequency photon aggragates ),
which are similar in frequency, but not identical, shield the lower reaches
of the Earth's shell from the effects of gravity by blocking the
gravity-inducing radiations. Thus does gravity diminish further down.
He explains antigravity as a negative charge which ends up being repulsed by
the gravitational charge of the planet. This would explain the behavior of
clouds, spinning tops and UFOs. This seems to be the type of " gravity
shielding " mentioned by Dr. De Aquino, as the negative charges produced by
thermal agitation bring about repulsion/levitation.
But the language used in this post seems to suggest that gravity is a ray of
some type which needs shielding which is produced by thermal agitation.
According to Cater, it wouldn't be like that. It would be a matter of
negative charges being produced by the thermal agitation, such that
repulsion ensues. Yes, gravity exhibits repulsion ( the floating of
clouds ).
Here are a couple of examples from Cater. I don't believe that I ever posted
the following here:
" The Phenomenon Of Levitation
It is now apparent that gravity is an electrostatic effect, not some space
warp or mysterious force which with imponderable properties depicted by
orthodox physicists. It follows that if matter is impregnated with
sufficient quantities of negative charges, especially soft electrons, it
will become weightless and even levitate. Some " adepts " in the occult arts
have demonstrated this ability on occasion. In spite of this, and the
experimental evidence showing that negative charges are repelled by a
gravitational field, conventional theorists continue to ignore it, and
assume that gravity acts indiscriminately on all things alike. Once again,
this is to be expected. If orthodox scientists recognized the reality of
such things, they would automatically have to abandone nearly all the
concepts they hold dear.
Some individuals seem to have the ability to do the reverse of levitation
and impregnate their bodies with na abnormal positive charge by perhaps
expelling large quantities of negative charges from their bodies. The make
themselves inordinately heavy by this means. A certain dwarf who had a
normal weight of 123 pounds could increase his weight to 900 pounds. He
demonstrated his ability on television under rigouous fraud-control
conditions. In fact, one famous strong man who lifted him up was unable to
hold him when he decided to increase his weight to 900 pounds. During this
perilous turn of events, our scientists once again showed admirable exposure
and resourcefulness. They remained silent.
Missle Loss in Space Explained
The physics of levitation was demonstrated in part when missles were found
to have lost most of their original weight after traveling through the Van
Allen Radiation Belt and returning to Earth. The mystery deepened when this
weight loss continued for some time, and containers in which pieces of the
missle were placed also lost weight. This event was hushed up in keeping
with standard policy concerning things which are damaging to orthodox
concepts. The radiations belts contain high concentrations of negative
charges of all kinds, from hard electrons to the very soft ones.
The missle became impregnated with negative charges as it passed through
this region. Since they are of varying types, it was able to absorb na
abnormal quantity. The more penetrating softer particles opened the door for
the harder particles to enter. A similar principle is involved in the
operation of a transformer .... Because the missle continued to lose weight,
and was evidently losing particles which originally caused it to lose
weight, a paradox arises. The loss of weight of the container, in which
pieces of the missle were placed, which would mean that the pieces were
discharging some of the negative charges they had picked up in the radiation
belt, and were then absorbed by the container. "
Bye Now,
Dean
2. His equations reduce to simpler more familiar and universally accepted
equation forms when limit parameters are substituted ,3. The equation units canceled as required yielding correct final units,
4. And last but not least, his equations can be applied to the real world
resulting in practical and useful Engineering hardware (space crafts, free
energy, zero gravity manufacturing facilities etc.).Last November, I started corresponding with Fran on a daily basis via
email in an effort to design a practical experiment to verify his theory
(see
email archives at http://starshiptechnology.homestead.com/index.html).
January 2000 Fran was successful and has since posted the results on the
Los Alamos bulletin board (see http://arXiv.org/ftp/gr-
qc/papers/0005/0005107.pdf). A detailed explanation of the experiment
and some implications can be found at
News, Politics, Sports, Mail & Latest Headlines - AOL.com.Last month (June 2000) Fran ceased email contact with his normal
correspondence group. The last emails received indicated his experiment
was "taken away" by people outside his university. I am in contact with a
physics professor in Brazil who is trying to find out the details of what
happened. So far, I have heard nothing.Interesting correlation's between a practical space craft based on Fran's
theory and credible UFO accounts (from P. Hill's book UFOs - A Scientific
Analysis) are:A craft shielded from all universe gravitational fields will exhibit zero
mass
thus obtaining supraliminal speeds (see
http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/space/07/20/speed.of.light.ap/index.html ).
This opens the possibility in interstellar (and even extra-galactic)
travel
over time spans of hours (or even minutes or less).
ELF radiation can saturate automobile and utility pole transformer cores
causing engine stalls and brownouts. No permanent damage would result
and functionally would return to normal when the field is removed.ELF radiation could interfere with normal brain wave activity causing
disorientation and flu like symptoms.A near zero mass craft will fall in air like a leaf or coin in water.
Since power applied to the craft is sinusoidal, reduced mass will vary
according to the sine wave amplitude resulting in a "jitter" effect.According to Frans inertial mass equivalence definition, negative mass
will
repel normal (positive) mass. (This is opposite of many predictions from
well known physicists. The difference comes from the F=ma equation
interpretation. See Fran's posted data showing the mass decreasing or
repelling after the zero mass null.). Repelling negative mass will bend
tree
branches and knock things down upon step function velocity changes
(Newton's Law). In addition, the sinusoidal effect will literally "shake"
the
immediate environment resulting in a buzzing noise with no apparent
origin.
Negative mass repulsion will ionize air (Nitrogen) molecules resulting in
a
bluish cold plasma ice cream coned shaped cold plasma. At close range,
the ionized radiation will cause superficial 1st degree skin burns.
Finally,
negative mass repulsion will produce horizontal motion when tilted. Hill
talks about this extensively. For those who remember, Hill is the man
photographed riding the circa 1950's fan powered platform in military
documentaries. Hill indicated most think it was an effort to build a
flying
sauces when in fact it was an experiment to confirm tilted platforms
exhibit
ยทยทยท
horizontal as well as vertical vector components (precursor to the Harrier
Jet).Also see System G related:
News, Politics, Sports, Mail & Latest Headlines - AOL.comBest - Steve
------- End of forwarded message -------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve WingateAnomalous Images and UFO Files
http://www.anomalous-images.com-> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics