···
Dean, I've read your ORIGIN OF MOON
CRATERS website idea. You wrote:
"The only logical answer is that
the craters were produced by particle beam weapons during the great
interplanetary war. This, no doubt, was the one mentioned earlier,
when the planet Maldek was destroyed. Other planetary bodies show
similar craters, for instance, Mercury, Mars and the moons of
Jupiter."
You may be right in the above!
It's a better explanation than the ridiculous "meteor impacts"
assumption. Besides, I'm a science fiction fan too! Velikovsky,
minus the space war idea, thought massive "natural" electrical
discharges between bodies was one cause of catastrophes.
AN ALTERNATE
POSSIBILITY...
But there may be an another possible
"logical" explanation for moon craters as well. This is
purely hypothetical on my part (but backed by what James Churchward
contended about HOW worlds and suns may be have similarly
formed.
Just for the moment, assume (or
pretend) that Churchward was correct about earth's initial
beginning....
A centripetal force (the
"finger" of the Creator?) collected super hot gases in space and
rough and tumbled them into a spherical form. The nebula contained
all the elements that would make up the earth's crust, waters and
atmosphere. (Clever Being, that Creator). And for the moment, also
assume that Churchward was correct that after SOME of the gases
cooled and went into chemical combinations to form the rock crust,
a large, thick portion of the MOLTEN matter remained hot and
molten just under and in contact with the "harder" cooling rock
crust - for definite PURPOSES. (Churchward has a
"neutral zone" explanation why no further solidifying of the
molten matter will occur, but that is not necessary to my supposition
at this moment. Will explain later.)
But to get to my alternative idea
about moon craters, I feel some basic explanation is first
necessary before going into it. Please bear with me even if this
seems "tedious" stuff. Quit now and you'll miss the
"exciting" conclusion...
A "FRICTION LINE" DUAL
MAGNET..****.
If Churchward is correct, there is
a FRICTION LINE, where earth's hard crust meets the
molten matter (rotating at a slower pace than the hard crust)
creating a DUAL MAGNET. (He suggests a similar condition for
ALL planets and stars rotating on an axis and necessary for a body to
generate forces). FRICTION attracts all forces to itself. Similarly,
a surface dynamo's "friction" attracts certain forces out of the
atmosphere into itself. The atmosphere quickly returns to the former
filled condition as surrounding forces rush in to equalize the volume
in the atmosphere near the dynamo.
THE COLD MAGNETIC
DIVISION...
The "cold magnetic division" of
earth's dual functioning "magnet" just under the harder crust
attracts only elemental matter in the crust, surface and atmosphere,
to itself. He called this the "cold magnetic force" - or what
we usually refer to as "the force of gravity."
No electromagnetic forces, no heat
or light forces, etc. are involved with the normal downward
"pull" of the cold magnetic division of the central magnet on
elemental matter in the crust, surface or atmosphere. This
division of the central magnet, and whatever unseen special force it
radiates, has exclusive magnetic "pulling" control over elemental
matter. (That clever Creator preferred to make things
specialized).
THE ELECTROMAGNETIC
DIVISION..****.
The 2nd division, the
"electromagnetic division" of the central magnet, attracts
all electromagnetic Forces to it; earth's invisible-to-sight heat
forces, light forces, combining forces, the compound Life or Vital
force, various other magnetic forces and uncountable other
electromagnetic forces used by Nature.
At all times, earth's great and
continuous CENTRIFUGAL FORCE is antagonistic to the "pull"
of this "central" magnet upon elements, attempting to throw all
elements (and the moon) out into space. Neutral zones
have been formed between the centrifugal force and central
magnet, that make life on earth's surface possible and keep all
finer elements held within the outer limits of earth's atmosphere.
(That clever Creator again.).
Also, this Dual magnet. "Friction
line" both REgenerates "exhausted" forces (as Churchward calls
them) returning to their friction line magnetic "source," from
the crust and atmosphere... and also generates NEW
electromagnetic earthly forces, both of which are then stored in a
temporarily dormant state in earth's "storehouse," the thick,
hard, relatively cold crust. They are stored in Earth's
"battery," until magnetically called forth by the Sun's
affinitive magnetic forces carried in her rays. (The Sun's
elemental rays possibly being the soft and hard particles theorized
by Cater? My speculation.)
EACH OF EARTH'S FORCES HAS
A SPECIAL PURPOSE...
Those multiple, invisible-to-vision forces
(each with a SPECIFIC PURPOSE in nature) permeate and saturate the
entire hard crust to the "holding capacity" of the elements in
the crust. Churchward claimed that ALL of earth's specialized
invisible forces need elements to exist WITH. (Forces animate
elements, set them into motion and life.) And each elemental
particle, including the atoms and parts smaller than atoms, can only
"hold" in suspension so much volume of force. Any additional
volume becomes an excess and gets "spilled" away... moving to
other elements or areas where the volume of forces is deficient and
then equalizes. The most obvious examples of this excess charge of
forces are the downward bolts of atmospheric LIGHTNING returning to
the hard crust storage house and overcharges of forces equalizing
horizontally across the sky to deficient areas, seen as "sheet
lightning."
THE CRUST IS
SATURATED WITH ALL FORCES...
According to Churchward, it is the
SATURATION of the hard crust, to the "holding capacity for
forces," of its overall elements, that prevents the "central"
layer of molten matter from cooling further. With no additional
"ROOM SPACE" within the hard crust's elements, to store
additional generated and regenerated forces, the volume of HEAT
FORCE (for example) still saturating the molten matter, cannot be
dispersed to the cold crust. The crust is already fully saturated.
Thus a NEUTRAL ZONE exists at the friction line. Only
re-generated existing forces returned from the surface and
atmosphere, and newly generated replacement forces generated at the
friction line can be moved to the "battery" storage house of the
"cold" crust. Earth is in balance and can cool no deeper.
EARTH IS KEPT
UPRIGHT BY THE GYROSCOPICAL FORCE
Another function of the molten layer grinding
against the hard crust, is that it keeps the earth UPRIGHT.
The encased centrifugal force inside the earth,
pressing the molten matter against the hard crust, creates a
GYROSCOPICAL force. Remember, the hard outside crust is rotating
faster than the molten layer. The difference between the two
creates a GYROSCOPICAL force; rotation also causing volumes of
forces to move UPWARD packing into the polar area, super magnetizing
the polar area.
The auroral display is shown
because the Sun's affinitive magnetic forces carried in her rays are
especially attracted to the extra volumes of the earth's
forces super magnetizing the polar regions.
THE NORTH POLAR AREA
IS SUPERMAGNETIZED...
Hole or not, the volume of all
forces yearly super-magnetizing the north polar area is being
attracted out into the atmosphere above the polar area by the sun's
powerful affinitive magnetic forces. Other sun forces activate
some of those auroral forces to affect elements in the atmosphere
(and the essence or ether) causing them to become visible to our
sight.
Churchward, in some agreement with
others contended that the elements of our "popular" atmosphere
(the analyzable elements) "float" in a thin essence (or ether)
surrounding earth, that while also being ELEMENTAL in nature, the
particles of the essence cannot be analyzed by our present
instruments. Radio waves and LIGHT waves from the electromagnetic
division for example, move through the thinner elements of the
essence, not through the "coarser" elements of the "popular"
atmosphere, though they affect both.
THE VITAL AND
ESSENTIAL ROLE OF THE SUN?
The Sun's magnetic forces
(having NO magnetic power over or direct effect upon earthly elements
and earth's surface, according to Churchward) have great affinity
only for the electromagnetic division forces stored in earth's
crust. The Sun's magnetic forces carried in her rays,
PENETRATE the crust (as Cater contends) and attract volumes of
earth's forces out into earth's atmosphere where other similar forces
from the sun give them life.
Without the sun magnetic forces,
earth's forces permeating the crust would largely stay there in the
crust, in a dormant, "cold" state. The sun's electromagnetic
forces give earth's electromagnetic forces life - indirectly rotate
earth on its axis - and hold earth in its precise orbit.
Only after the various earthly forces
are drawn out into earth's atmosphere, other special affinitive sun
forces mingle with them and agitate them into action in the
atmosphere. Affinitive heat forces from the sun cause earth's similar
heat forces to activate in the atmosphere. Affinitive light forces
from the sun cause earth's similar light force to be activated in the
atmosphere. Churchward contended that we do not get HEAT and LIGHT
DIRECTLY from the sun. There are no significant elemental particles
in space between earth and the sun to reflect light or raise
temperature. The sun's affinitive forces, carried to earth by its
rays, ACTIVATE earth's heat and light into life and movement only in
our atmosphere.
EARTH'S FORCES
PERMEATE EVERY ELEMENT IN THE CRUST, ON THE SURFACE AND IN THE
ATMOSPHERE...
This is vital to understand.
According to Churchward, like the force saturated crust, earth's many
generated forces also permeate every elemental particle on the
surface and throughout the atmosphere. Each day, the sun's
magnetic pulling forces draw out ADDITIONAL volumes of forces from
storage in earth's crust until they saturate the atmospheric
particles - and no more. Once the "holding capacity of
forces" for the thinner atmospheric elemental particles is reached,
filled to the maximum that the atmospheric particles can hold in
suspension, no more forces can be drawn out of the crust by the
sun's magnetic forces. The atmosphere is "filled" and any
temporary excess will be quickly returned to the crust's storehouse
as LIGHTNING.
THE SUN HAS NO DIRECT
MAGNETIC CONTROL OVER EARTH'S ELEMENTS AND SURFACE. EARTH'S ELEMENTS
ARE NEUTRAL TO THE SUN'S ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCES.
With no more forces to
"pull" out of earth's crust, the sun's further magnetic pull on
earth's forces is neutralized by each noon. Again as Churchward
contends, the sun's magnetic forces have NO direct control,
"pull" or hold upon earth's elemental surface. The sun cannot
magnetically grip earth's surface and hold one side to face the sun,
as earth does with the moon. Once the sun's pull on earth forces is
neutralized by the atmosphere being saturated, unable to hold more
forces in suspension, Earth's morning surface then continues to
freely rotate west to east out of sight of the sun.
(See later how this daily battle
between the sun's magnetic forces pulling earth's forces out into the
atmosphere against the resistance of earth's central magnet to
hold and keep her forces inside the crust, causes earth to rotate
on an axis. Its a simple but very clever procedure invented by the
Creator.)
But apparently the affinitive HEAT
forces (separate from the sun's above MAGNETIC forces) carried by
other Sun's rays do NOT penetrate the crust and DIRECTLY activate
earth's heat forces INSIDE the crust.. Reason this... If the
Sun's heat forces did affect the earth's heat forces stored in bulk
inside the crust DIRECTLY, they would cause the earth's own dormant
and inactive (cold) heat force permeating the entire crust to go into
action while still in the crust. The crust would overheat,
melt and spell the end of life on earth. This does not happen. Thus
it appears that ONLY AFTER earth's various stored forces in her crust
are attracted out into the atmosphere, do they become "agitated"
into full action, movement and life by similar affinitive forces from
the sun.
CONTRADICT
CATER?...
This may SEEM to contradict Cater
about soft and hard particles (rays?) from the sun penetrating the
crust, and producing LIGHT and heat within deep tunnels and chambers
in the crust and in the HE itself. I think a possible
reconciliation might be this: The sun's special (hard and soft
particle) elemental rays (carrying both invisible - and also
dormant - sun heat and sun light forces) may penetrate the crust as
Cater thinks. But for some reason (?), they do NOT directly and
immediately activate earth's heat and light forces permeating the
entire upper crust until the sun's rays pass some great distance
inward (Cater's 50 mile distance?). Only then do Cater's ray
particles begin to break down and "release" the light and heat
forces they carry, so that they then agitate earth's own deep light
and heat forces in caverns and tunnels and the HE into life.
Obviously only a limited portion is activated or they would agitate
earth's heat forces in the crust into FULL action and cause the
melting catastrophe I described above.
This partial activation might be
a reason for the DIM light within the HE hollow. (Clever Creator
again.) Perhaps only among earth's outer atmospheric elements can
HEAT and LIGHT turn on FULL force. Just speculative reconciliation on
my part.
HOW DOES THE SUN
(INDIRECTLY) CAUSE EARTH TO ROTATE ON AN AXIS?
Churchward contended ONLY
the Sun's electromagnetic forces carried by her rays affect earth's
electromagnetic forces... magnetically "pulling" them from
earth's storehouse crust, out into the atmosphere. Earth's
elements and earth's surface are neutral to any magnetic "pull"
from the sun's magnetic forces. I
Note the JPEG below (the Sun on
the right, earth on left)
As the morning quarter of earth (top
right) rotates into "sight" of the Sun, the Sun's magnetic
forces begin to "pull" out earth's forces being held in storage
in the morning quarter crust by earth's central magnet.
Earth's central magnet resists,
trying to hold her forces in the crust against the pull from the Sun.
But the Sun's magnetic pull is too strong. For a time Earth's magnet
with morning quarter, trying to hold tight to her forces, is DRAGGED
along with her forces as they gradually are pulled out into
the atmosphere from the morning quarter by the Sun's superior pull.
Once the forces have been pulled free, Earth's magnet surrenders the
effort. But by then the morning quarter surface crust has been
rotated west to east while "following" her forces.
By the time the morning quarter
surface has rotated and become the afternoon quarter (lower
right), all forces in that quarter have been pulled out of that
quarter of the crust saturating the atmosphere since noon. The Sun
having no magnetic control over the quarter's surface elements, the
now afternoon quarter continues rotating west to east, becoming the
evening quarter (lower left) The atmosphere above the surface,
being fully saturated with forces since noon, the sun's magnetic
forces (dotted lines striking the lower right quarter) from noon on,
have no more magnetic "pulling" power.on any earthly forces still
held in the afternoon quarter's surface.
![]()
By late afternoon, as the afternoon
quarter begins to rotate out of direct "sight" of the Sun,
some of the forces held in suspension in the afternoon atmosphere,
begin to return to their "home" in the evening crust (for
regeneration)
The afternoon quarter has now become
the evening quarter(lower left). All volumes of forces, aside
from a minority still needed to complete their tasks in the night
atmosphere, return to the crust for regeneration.
During the night (night quarter
upper left) all returned forces are being regenerated at earth's
friction line magnet. The night quarter crust becomes fully charged
again with stored forces.
And once again, the fully recharged
crust quarter rotates into morning sight of the Sun and the Sun
once again begins to pull the forces out into the atmosphere.
As each new recharged morning
quarter comes into view of the Sun, loses it forces by afternoon, a
new recharged morning quarter has rotated and come into sight of the
Sun and finds its forces also beginning to be pulled out. Each
morning, the earth's central magnet first resists, and each new
quarter is pulled along, "following" its gradually departing
forces, and is thus rotated from west to east.
And so it will continue to the end
of time... or until our Sun ceases to exist, Churchward was
convinced. Ever read of anyone else explaining as simply and
logically why and how earth is rotated on its axis by the Sun? I
haven't.
-------------------------------------------
**** Now what has
all the preceding got to do with MOON CRATERS?
Again, assume that
Churchward is correct that when earth's primary granite crust
solidified from a molten state, "purposely" placed within that
molten mass by the Creator, were volumes of NON-solidifying gases
that could not be absorbed by the forming and hardening granite
rock. Room space in the granite had to be allowed for the gases.
The granite solidified AROUND the gases. The gases formed
large and small BUBBLES of the most explosive type of gases that had
been in the nebula. Churchward, on good evidence, suspected that HALF
the volume of the solidifying, but still hot, soft and pliable
primary granite was filled with these bubbles of EXPLOSIVE VOLCANIC
GASES.
As the earth was regularly
rotating on an axis (by then under control of the Sun's forces as
described above with the JPEG, maintaining that rotation), the tops
and bottoms of the bubbles were FLATTENED in the still pliable and
plastic granite, covering greater horizontal area than height.
According to Churchward most of these gas filled volcanic chambers
were less than 400 feet from roof to floor. Many could be measured
with a foot ruler in height. But some were thousands of miles in
extent. And some miles deep. Many volcanic blowouts of the surface
bubbles (chambers) occurred long BEFORE the waters and atmosphere
formed on earth.
The subsequent formation of earth's
atmosphere and water (eventually covering the entire surface rocks)
is the rest of early earth's story. The constant blowouts of near
surface chambers, Churchward claimed, were responsible for all the
emersions and submersions of land in earth's subsequent history, and
as well for our ocean depths as multiple subterranean chambers, one
under the other, indirectly emptied of their bolstering gases,
collapsed under water, pancake fashion, to form very deep holes. As
you must know, the mountains and mountain ranges were a different and
special story, only uplifted in "recent" times, most between
between 15,000 and 12,000 years back, according to Churchward.
THE MOON CRATERS.
FINALLY GOT TO THEM!
Whether the moon formed near earth or
somehow wandered in and was "captured" by earth must remain a
mystery for now.
Dean, consider this... Perhaps the
early moon formed similarly to earth as described by Churchward, from
a hot nebula of gases. Its granite crust, like earth's,
solidified around bubbles of volcanic gases. Like earth, at first
a MOLTEN center layer formed and the moon, initially rotated on an
axis, under control of earth's forces similar to how the Sun controls
earth. (Moon has to be under control of earth's forces and magnet,
not the sun's, or it would be orbiting the sun, not earth.)
For unknown reasons, let us assume
that water and atmospheric elements were DEFICIENT in the moon's
creating nebula. And let us assume that the molten layer,
necessary to form a FRICTION LINE magnet was also thin and deficient
for the size of the moon. A thin and deficient molten layer, at first
rotating VERY, VERY slowly with the forming outer crust of the moon
rotating only slightly faster, would be incapable of generating
forces like earth. What heat forces the moon retains, may be
stored in the crust. Most initial heat force withdrawn from the early
Moon's shallow atmosphere, may have caused the outer crust to cool,
solidify and harden the moon's upper surface rock layers much faster
than on earth. With its surface hardened, subsequent uplifting of
rock layers into "mountains" or Rilles that stayed fixed in
uplifted triangles with base supports, may have been more common than
on forming earth.
The heat, light and other forces
(present in her creating nebula) that the moon may continue to still
retain in its thin molten layer, but now fixed and no longer
rotating on an axis, might still be present, but very deficient. And
without an rotating spin, a CENTRIFUGAL force would be nearly absent.
Unlike the neutrality of the Sun to Earth's elements claimed by
Churchward, the moon's surface appears to be under the same cold
magnetic control of earth's central magnet as are all other earthly
elements.
Only earth's powerful centrifugal force and
accompanying unseen REPELLANT forces may be keeping the moon from
crashing into earth, pulled inward by Earth's elemental magnet.
Magnetically, earth's magnet has fixed one side of the moon to face
us. About the above 2 paragraphs we can probably be in general
agreement.
But about the Moon craters...
I'm assuming the moon in the very distant past, did at first
rotate very slowly around an axis. Some centrifugal force from
the spin, would have, as on earth, forced deeper volcanic gases
upward, over-compressing relatively shallow, but horizontally
expansive, flattened "bubble" chambers near the surface. The roof
would be raised, the gases "bubbling up" along with melted lava,
puncture the plastic roof, the gases escaping, not through a central
cone, but all around the edges, and the central roof would crash down
to the floor of the shallow chamber. But minus water to cover and
compress the roof into a sedimentary rock layer. Another chamber
directly BENEATH the collapsed chamber would still be receiving more
volumes of deeper gases and its roof too would be raised, but now
meeting greater resistance, above from the combined floor and fallen
roof of the first shallow chamber. The lower roof would be raised
but not enough to puncture through the compacted rock layers above. A
relatively small dimple cone, a small "mountain" cone, might be
pushed up inside the initial upper crater as Dean observed some have
been upthrust.
The absence of large volumes of moon
water (there must be some under the surface) would leave the
many relatively shallow, ROUND, blown-out craters pretty much as they
existed just after they collapsed. Without vast quantities of
water on the surface to alter the rocks and produce sedimentary
layers, only atmospheric erosion would wear down the rocks. If some
are correct, the moon does have some atmosphere and some erosion may
have taken place. The Rilles, it seems to be could be early "gas
belts" like on earth, finding it difficult to puncture the harder
surface rocks above, moving along deeply but raising the rocks above
into a rudimentary form of minor "mountain ridges" as they
searched for an ancient volcanic crater to escape through.
Anyway the above is my hypothetical
"alternative" possibility for moon Craters and Rilles to add your
your space wars scenario. The IMPACT crater theory is
implausible.
.
.
List
Members,
At the bottom left of
this image is the Lunar crater Mercator, and just above it to the
left is Camanus. Just above Campnaus, running at a slant, is a lunar
rille ( ravine, kind of ).
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/research/lunar_orbiter/img/4-132H1.jpg
I would like to point
out that the rille runs through three craters, the third one being in
the bottom left of the picture where it merges with another crater.
It is very unlikely that this happened by chance. If the rille were a
dry river bed left over from previous epochs, then how did those
craters hit it like that? Three of them along that
rille.
And the rille runs over
a mountanous area in the bottom left of the pic. If it were an
ancient river bed, then how did it run through a
mountain? Rivers usually flow down one side of a mountain, they
don't pass right over it and keep on going.
I think that the
attached explanation by Joseph H. Cater explains both the formation
of the craters and the rilles themselves, rather well. The rilles are
coming in from the plain and cutting through the mountains. A beam
directed along the lunar floor, which draws in electrons from the
sides and explodes matter outwards, could have opened up the rille as
it went along, something like that.
Posted by
Dharma/Dean
