Thanks, Dick,
I'm happy to see other intelligent individuals who are starting to see
through frauds like Branton. You presented this discovery in a much more
delicate manner than I chose to do, but I agree with you completely. He's
the type of sensationalist who will take elements of truth and distort or
exaggerate or fantasize upon them until they have become completely false
representations.
Yes, he does present an item here or there which turns out to be seemingly
accurate, but that only adds credence to his propensity to present the rest
of his falsifications as "Actual Truths."
With the plethora of information that is coming forth, from which we can
glean the truth of the whole picture, it's important that we don't get
distracted from this quest by those who exploit the curios nature of the
searchers. We need to be equally suspicious of the self-asserted "Truth
Revealers" as we are of the suspected truth hiding conspirators.
It's important to not waste our time, or to allow our quest to be diverted by
these fanciful detours. I'm not saying that we shouldn't read everything,
because, yes, we should. I'm only saying that we need to quickly discern
between the truth seekers, and the truth seeker exploiters. Once a few of us
discover these patterns of deceit in these writers, and expose their
inaccuracies when our personal experiences and knowledge flush them out, then
we need to move on to other more accurate and well-meaning sources.
We need to remember that everything that is printed is not necessarily
factual, even if the authors claim the things they write to be absolutely
true.
Thanks Dick, for your efforts to flush this out, and sharing your opinion
with us. Your observations support my opinion of Mr. Branton's lack of value
in our search for the true nature of our Earth's cosmogony.
Keep up the good work all.
Norlan