Aurora and Cater

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Yahoo Group (Old Posts)
1

List Members, August 10th

I have just received a letter from Joseph H. Cater with some info on the
aurorae. About the rotational movement, he confirmed what I had mentioned
before, I think. He said: " The aurorae is produced by soft particles [ low
frequency photon aggragates ] ejected out of the egress in all directions.
On the day side these ejected particles encounter a very high concentration
of particles from the sun moving in the opposite direction, which is going
to drastically reduce the distance they travel. On the night side they don't
have this experience and thus travel a greater distance before dissapating.
This, of course, creates the illusion of rotation."

About the sound associated with the auroral display, Mr. Cater says that
this is due to the soft particles disintegrating into its constituent light,
releasing hard electrons, whicvh affect the molecules of the atmosphere.

Thus if we incorporate Cater's understanding of low fequency photon
aggragates which contain and camouflage harder, visible electrons, so many
mysteries related the hollow Earth geophysics become understandable, such as
the source and nature of the inner sun, the cause and nature of gravity, and
the mechancis behind the aurorae.

Dean

2

The following was adapted from the website:
NASA photograph of Venus, number: 79-HC-46, is very indicative of a hollow
planets.

( Note: The picture was culled out of NASA files by Jan Lamprecht and
appears in his book " Hollow Planets." Both the picture as well as the
following arguments have been adapted from Jan's book
www.hollowplanets.com ).

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index4.html
( scroll halfway down )
The list member will notice how the curvature of the planet's atmosphere
changes as his/her eye approaches the Southern pole. Two, rounded, twirling,
cloud billows are obvious, but there actually seem to be more than two. They
extend from the Southern extremity and elongate the atmosphere. Venus does,
in fact, experience a rising and falling of its atmosphere by as much as
1.1%. That represents a huge expansion given the fact that the diameter of
the Venusian globe is 7,700 miles. Could the expansion of the Venusian
atmosphere and the billowing at the poles be a symptom of the planet's
breathing through polar holes?

Is there additional evidence of polar holes? For starters, astronomers tell
us that the cloud levels above the Venusian North Pole are 15 kilometers
lower than those of the rest of the planet. Is this depression indicative of
atmosphere being sucked into Venus, just as the cloud billows extending from
the South pole indicate a huge blowing-out? Of course it is! There is a
vortex at the Northern pole. There is even a NASA study called vortex to
study this very phenomenon.
We are witnessing the wind currents of a hollow planet in this photo, and it
is obvious.
After blowing out of the Southern opening, you will notice that the cloud
currents get caught up in an equatorial pattern. The pattern doesn't stretch
all the way around, but that could be due to another opening along the
equator sucking the atmosphere back in, similar to the Great Red Spot on
Jupiter or a similar spot on Neptune.
I'll try to send several pictures depicting the currents emanating from the
Southern pole of Venus and then wrapping around. But it is important for a
person to get an idea of the planets, know what they look like, and to have
at least some idea of the dynamic processes which take place on the planets.
Only then could you stop and ask " how could all this be understood in terms
of a hollow planet?"
And it is not hard to do this, and it's fun. Just go to www.google.com and
peck in the names of the planets. Get familiar with the Moon and its
craters. It's all on the net.
Then come back to the list and ask a question or two.

I've got some interesting pics of the Martian polar regions which really
suggest openings and a hollow planet, but maybe next time.

Dean/Dharmapada

3

List Members,

To get to the archives and get a running sense of what we've been
discussing, follow the following instructions:

eGroups is happy to offer a web interface that allows group members access
to an online archive of the messages posted to your groups. You may locate
the message archive for a group by following these steps:

1. Sign into the eGroups site.(http://www.egroups.com/mygroups)

2. Click the name of the group that you would like to visit on your My
Groups page.

3. Click the "Messages" link on the group's Main Page.

Posts in the message archive are ordered chronologically. Members may
perform searches within the archive in order to locate certain messages.
The "Archive Search" will search the subject line, sender and body of all of
the archived messages.

Posted by Dean/Dharmapada

4

Here is something from the appendix to Admiral MacMillan's book Four Years
in the White North. It suggests a possible origin of the Eskimo people in
the hollow portion of the Earth.
Afterwards, I'll put in a few comments which have appeared in various books,
such as The Hollow Earth. All together, we have here some very
thought-provoking evidence.
Here is the part from MacMillan's appendix:

" Captain Richardson, in his work The Polar Regions; says: ' The Eskimos of
Point Barrow have a tradition, reported by Dr. Simpson, surgeon of the
Plover ( in the year 1832 ), of some of their tribe having been carried to
the North on ice broken up in a southery gale, and arriving, after many
nights at a hilly coun-try inhabited by people like themselves, speaking
the Eskimo language, and by whom they were well received. After a long stay,
one spring in which the ice remained without movement they returned without
mishap to their own country and reported their adventures."
Here is the part which has appeared in various books:

Marshall B. Garner felt the Eskimos migrated from inside the Earth to their
present home of the rim of the alleged Polar opening. In A Journey to the
Earth's Interior, or, Have the Poles Really Been Discovered? Gardner
elaborated on his unusual belief. He wrote:
The question we will answer is: ' who are the Eskimo and where did they come
from? ' That it is necessary to pose this question is shown by what Fridtjof
Nansen, the explorer, has to say on the subject. Nansen tells in his
Northern Mists all that has been previously discovered about the Eskimo. One
is astonished to see that it all ends in a question mark. In other words,
only a little is known about the Eskimos, and as to their origin nothing is
known.

Nansen on the Eskimos

And yet the Eskimo must have come from somewhere to his present habitat, for
as Nansen says " his world is that of the sea, ice and cold, for which
nature had not intended human beings"- implying, of course, that the Artic
regions were not the original home of this race. He goes on: " as men of the
white race pushed northward to the ' highest latitudes ' they found traces
of this remarkable people, who had already been there in times long past;
and it is only in the last few decades that anyone has succeeded farther
North than the Eskimo, partl by learning from him, or enlisting his help. In
these regions, which are his own, his culture was superior to that of the
white race, and from no other people has the Artic nevegator learned so
much.

A Puzzle

The north coast of America and the islands to the north of it, the Bering
Straight to the East coast of Greenland, is the territory of the Eskimo ...
Within these limits the Eskimo must have developed into what they are now.
In their anthropological race characteristics, in their sealing and whaling
culture and in their language they are very different from all other known
peoples, both in America and Asia, and we must suppose that for long ages,
ever since they began to fit themselves for their life along the frozen
shores, they have lived apart, separated from othes, perhaps for a long time
as a small tribe. They all belong to the same race; the cerebral formation,
for instance, of all real Eskimos, from Alaska to Greenland, is remarkable
homogeneous; but in the far West they may have been mixed with indians and
others, and in Greenland they are now mixed with Europeans. They are
pronouncedly dolichocephalic; but have short, broad faces, and by their
features and appearances are easily distinguished from other neighboring
peoples. Small, alanting eyes, nose small and flat, narrow between the eyes
and broad below; cheeks, broad, prominent and round; the forehead narrowing
comparitively above; the lower part of the face broad and powerful; balck,
straight hair. The color of the skin is a pale brown. The Eskimos are not,
as is aften supposed, a small people on an average; they are rather of
middle height, often powerful, sometimes quite tall, although they are a
good deal shorter, and weaker in appearance than average Skandanavians. In
appearance and also in language they come nearest to some of the North
American tribes."
Nansen admits that he is puzzled- in common with other inquirers, no two of
whom agree- over the origin of the Eskimo race. The real central point of
their culture, he says, is seal hunting, " especially with the harpoon,
sometimes in the kayak in open water and sometimes from the ice. We cannot
believe that this sealing, especially with the kayak, was first developed in
the central part of the regions they now inhabit; there the conditions of
like would have been too severe, and they would not have been able to
support themselves until their sealing culture had obtained a certain
development. Just as in Europe we met with the ' Finnish' sea-fishing on a
coast that was connected with milder coasts further South, where seamanship
was first able to develop, so we must expect that the Eskimo culture began
on coasts with similar conditions ... "

D. Nansen then discusses the various possible mild coasts on which the
Eskimo might have learned his sealing and navigation, but cannot come to any
satisfactory conclusion and says that the question will have to be left
open.

The fact that the question cannot be settled in any other way naturally
impresses us with the probability that it will be settled through the
application of our theory. The coasts on the polar orifice on the inner side
of the Earth would afford the ideal conditions for the earliest habitat of
the Eskimo race, and, as we shall see later, there are other facts which
make us certain that the Eskimo race as we know it today is an overflow from
the settlements on the borders of the polar orifice. Not only shall we show
later that there has actually been communication between the Eskimos of the
north and and the Antartic region- we shall show that the uninhabited part
of the world has been visited by Eskimos or similar people coming through
the interior of the Earth- but many things in Eskimo history and tradition
point to their coming from the interior.

They Came from the North

First, however, let us note that Nansen lists quite a number of scientists
all holding " various views as to the origin of the Eskimo," which, however,
are all different from the idea set forth by Nansen that they must have come
from a milder climate than their present one. Nansen notes that on the
American Artic islands the Eskimos no longer live as far north as they once
did- where older traces of them are found. It is evident in this case that
they began north and gradually made their way south. But that beginning was
not only north, but was in the interior. And in many other cases we shall
see that the farther north ones goes, the more one sees traces of Eskimos,
and we shall also find it true that all their traditions point to the north,
and even to a condition of things which can only be explained on the theory
that they once lived in a land of perpetual sunshine- which the interior of
the Earth is.

...

That the Eskimos left the interior of the Earth very early- perhaps when the
northern climate was milder than it is now and therefore more attractive to
them- seems probable. Nansen says:
" There can be no doubt that the Eskimo arrived in Greenland before the
Norwegian Icelanders. The rich finds referred to among others by Dr. H. Rink
of Eskimo whaling and sealing weapons and implements of stone from deep
deposits in North Greenland show tha the Eskimo were living there far back
in prehistoric times."

And in a note appended to this statement Nansen adduces evidence to show
that in those prehistoric times the Eskimos lived more to the north than
they do at the present time- a very significant thing to admit, seeing that
it points to a northern and not a southern origin and starting point.

But the Eskimos had learned a number of things, that is to say, they were
not a new tribe emerging from savagery but had a history behind them, when
they did take up their abodes on the northern shores of the outer world.
Nansen remarks that they " must have had at the time of their first
immigration much the same culture in the main as now, since otherwise they
would not have been able to support themselves in these northern regions."

...

Poorer Hunting in the South

This quotation answers any reader who may wonder why the Eskimos emigrated
from the interior in the first place, where the climate is mild, out into
the regions of north Greenland where it is harder. The answer is that the
Eskimo is by nature a hunter and fisher, just as some tribes of the Earth
are naturally nomads and roam. The Eskimos were hunters and fishers of
whale, narwhale, seal etc., and they persued their prey gradually over the
polar lip. As long as they had sought these creatures in open water they had
great difficulty in catching them. When they came to an ice-bound region,
after they had come down past the region of warm currents and open sea
around the poles, they found it easier to catch their prey. When they went
too far South, so that the sea became warm and open again, they could no
longer do this so easily, and so, as Nansen points out, they remained in
localities where the winter meant ice. " Southern Greenland, therefore, had
no great attraction, so long as there was room enough further North."

In other words, the Eskimo who came too far south found out what we have
seen that the polar explorers from our own countries found out- a greater
abundance of life further north.

That the Eskimo came from the interior of the Earth, that is to say, from a
location which they could not easily explain to the Norwegians who might
have asked where they originally came from, is shown by the fact that early
Norwegians regarded them as supernatural people, a species of fairy. When we
remember that in the efforts of these Eskimos to tell where they came from
they would point to the north and describe a land of perpetual sunshine, it
is easy to see that the Norwegians who associated the polar regions with the
end of the world, certainly not with a new world, would wonder at the
strange origin thus indicated. They would naturally assume that these were
supernatural beings who came from some region under the Earth- as that was
always considered to be the abode of fairies, gnomes and similar creatures.

5

Frode-

Here the NOAA people say " Instruments on board the NOAA Polar-orbiting
Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) continually monitor the power
flux carried by the protons and electrons that produce aurora." But they
can't measure the soft eletrons emanating from the interior, right? So what
are they measuring- the electrons which are present after the disintegration
which causes the auroral display?

This is my understanding, I just want to get a reality check.

http://sec.noaa.gov/pmap/Intro.html

The first page has some nice pics: http://sec.noaa.gov/pmap/

Dean

6

Members,

I have just inserted something into that gravity article on the Hollow Earth
in the Puranas site.
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index8.html
I had nicely conveyed Cater's point about gravity being a matter of a
negative electrostatic force. I had given lots of rationale from Cater, the
whole process about how the charge is created by the Sun's rays, how the
rays penetrate the Earth, etc.

But I hadn't given any explanation as to why matter has a natural positive
charge. This is important because it is the opposite positive charge of
matter ( i.e., our bodies have a slightly positive charge ) which is
attracted by the negative gravity charge.

The first couple of sentences from Chapter 11 of The Awesome Life Force give
the reason:

" Since the electrons move at much higher velocities in the atoms than
protons, and cover much more territory, a higher percentage of their
electrostatic charge is transformed into magnetic energy. This means that
the positive charge in the atom will overbalance the negative charge, and
give the atom an overall, positive charge. This explains why electricity
tends to move towards the ground ...." ( The Awesome Life Force, Page 127 ).
"

Dean

7

In " A New Dawn for Hollow Earther's,"
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index7.html , scope for considering
the inner sun as the source of the aurorae has been presented in the form of
a NASA article. The article now tells us that the Sun is NOT the source of
the particles causing the auroral displays:

" Now, the authors tell us that the source of the aurorae are the ions in
the ionosphere and that " Chappell ... published a paper describing the
polar ion fountain and described the ionosphere as a ' fully adequate source
of material for the magnetosphere. '" In other words, in their model it is
the high strata known as the ionosphere which supplies the ions to agitate
the auroral displays. But that is not to say that an inner sun couldn't be
the ultimate source of the aurora.

This NASA publication is nothing less than a landmark article as it tends to
support some of the concepts that Hollow Earth proponents have been
proposing for a long time. For example, one complaint about the Hollow Earth
Theory's idea of an inner sun has always been that we can't see any evidence
of it, such as inner sun rays. But the aurora can now be presented as
probable evidence of an inner sun."

I reproduce the following from Sadek Adam's book Hollow Earth Authentic,
this part on the aurorae. A couple of you might have seen this on that old
HED list:

AURORA
Auroras are brilliant luminous displays of light which occur mainly at very
high altitudes.The Aurora Borealis or Northern Lights are more frequent and
well defined than the Aurora Australia or Southern Lights.

Science says the aurora is related to the 11 year sunspot cycle. When
disturbances of the sun throw off many more particles than can normally be
shielded by the magnetosphere, some of them reach the earth's atmosphere
near the magnetic poles and cause a glow. Also dense cores of ionization
along geomagnetic lines of force.

The hollow Earth view is that the aurora is simply sunlight from the central
sun shining through the polar openings. We have much evidence for this,
again quoting our friends GARDNER and REID who reported from observations of
the great 19th century explorers.

Gardner ( book 1 ) A Journey to the Earth's Interior

Greely saw a perfectly circular aurora which he called a mock sun burning
colours of blue, yellow and red with bars of white. Also: " crown of light,
brilliant streamers, brilliant arch, clearly defined patches of light detach
themselves as puffs of smoke from a pipe: fine aurora like a pillar of
glowing fire." ( Book 1e )

Nansen: " A wreath of streamers upwards towards a corona, which shone like a
halo: a dark patch in its middle. where all the rays converged: fresh
streamers shot out outside the inner halo, other shafts of light in a still
wider circle."

Lt. Weyprech: " Aurora, an arch of light, the upper limit of a segment of a
circle." Parry :
" no magnetic disturbance when aurora was seen." Payer: " impossible to tell
whether rays shoot from above downward or from below upward."

Dick: Comments on Greely's men: " aurora coloured through breaking up
sunlight as in a rainbow. No noise ( crackling ), no magnetic and electrical
dsturbance."

Kane: " Aurora is brightest when white, i.e., the light is not split up due
to a damp atmosphere. This indicates light from an interior sun."

Nordenskiold, New York Herald: " Faintly luminous arc, motionless, like a
ring of light surrounding the northern portion of the globe."

Scientific American Supplement, February 17, 1883, from La Luminiere
Electrique: " Descartes, Ellis, Frobisher. Franklin, Raspail and Wolfert:
All these scholars have stated that they think the aurora comes from
sunlight."

Gardner quotes Taylor Reed [ from ] Popular Astronomy, 1895: " Both the
aurorae and the ( solar system ) sun's corona have the same spectroscopic
analysis, a faint, continuous spectrum.

REED ( Book 2 ) Phantom of the Poles
" Reed notes the phenomenon ot " water sky ". Around the lip of the polar
opening the sky acts as a mirror, and whalers and explorers depend on the
reflection of the surface in the sky to determine what lies ahead.
Similarly, the reflection of light from an inner source could form an
aurora. "

Bernacchi: " The light first emanated in a waving curtain ...arrow-like
beams ... like some great searchlight. "

Nansen: Gives a very good description of the appearance of the inner sun as
he traversed the lip of the polar opening. He says he observed the sun, days
earlier than expected and in the opposite direction. He afterwards said it
was a mock sun or mirage

Nansen gives an excellent description of what we now know to be the Earths
�nner sun ( and what Reed thought was an inner volcano ). Nansen is one of
the few explorers to have actually gone so far around the lip of the opening
so as to see the inner sun. He was sailing, as it is mostly iquid water in
the vicinity of the opening.

Among other observattions, far too numerous to mention, are the following:

Nansen: Spectral light like the reflection of a fire far away.

Hall: Streamers gathered round the zenith and formed a perfect corona. Beams
of luminous clouds ... formed an arch ... moved very slowly.

Reed quotes H.S. Gardiner, one of Greely's assistants: Display's of unusual
grandeur unparalleled brilliancy, its light equal to the full moon.
Prismatic colours ...approached near to the Earth. Several of Greely's other
assistants are also quoted.

Much more detail will be found in Gardner and Reed, who each devote a
chapter

EXAMINING the nature of the AURORA at once negates the " charged particles
from the sun " idea and also establishes the existence of the central sun,
the SMOKY GOD [ see VNN article A New Dawn for Hollow Earthers ]

It was very satisfying therefore to find something substantial in Colliers
Encyclopedia in support of our claims about the aurora. We are grateful to
Colliers for the statement that the aurora creates a visual halo. This halo
can be admired in its entirety only by space travellers, and it occurs on
the rim of each hole of the magnetic doughnut ( 1995 8:476 ) Thank you
Colliers. They also say (1995 3:232 ) the aurora is the subject of intense
study, and its exact nature and origin is unknown. Danke Schon.

Extending the auroral theme to Earth's two neighbours, we again come across
orthodox science reaching a stalemate. If you viewed Earth's polar regions
from Mars or Venus and knew nothing about hollow worlds with central suns
and polar openings, you would think the bright white polar areas were snow
and ice cover. Or charged particle from the Sun.. Science says the aurora
has not been definitely observed for other planets ( Colliers Enc. '95
3:232 ). So, when astronomers here on earth look at the polar regions of
Mars and see a bright white polar patch, they're satisfied, because Mars is
cold and most definitely has frozen poles. But when they look at Venus and
see the same bright polar patch, perhaps even larger, they are baffled
everyone knows Venus is far too hot for polar ice.

So, we say all three planets are hollow with a central sun whose rays
sometimes " leak out " through polar openings, giving rise to a display of
light called the AURORA.

The encyclopedias say the following about Mars and Venus:

MARS- Aerial views of the north and south polar areas similar to Earth's
near circular zones of solid white ice. A view of the whole planet shows
circular, white polar caps, which get smaller in the summer ... may contain
frozen water. ( World Book Encyclopedia, 1996, 13:222 ). " A cap appears to
evaporate."
" Evaporate " is a strange word to use in connection with frozen water!

The encyclopedia also says the evaporating polar caps may provide some of
the water present in the atmosphere.
The global view of Mars shown above [ Note: Pictures of Mars from the
Mariner probes 6 and 7 are shown which didn't come out in the scanner]
appears in several publication. The bright polar light is always very
pronounced and appears to extend beyond the planet's surface. [ Note: In
other words, a Martian aurora ]

Venus: No mention is made of polar caps -- these were only mentioned by 19th
Century astronomers
( see below ) but there are three interesting pointers to a polar opening:

( i ) A crescent-shaped collar of cloud surrounds the north pole of Venus at
about 70* North ( Atlas of the Solar System, Patrick Moore and Gary Hunt,
Royal Astronomical Society/Mitchell Beazly
(ii) "Polar Vortices " occur -- a constituent feature of the complex, dense
atmospheric system ( Atlas of the Solar System Bill Yenne, Bison Books
1987 )
(iii) A diagram of Venus shows a strange circular depression, like a round
polar openIng, but the text says it is low level surface ( Times Atlas of
the World, 1990 ), also in the above two atlases.

The above orthodox views on Mars and Venus are not in any way conclusive as
to the existence of polar openings, as the 20th century scientific world is
too rigid to result in that discovery. But just look at these observations
by 19th Century astronomers ( some famous names, too) , taken from GARDNER

VENUS: F W Henkel The English Mechanic and World of Science

" Dark portions of the planet's disc occasionally [ have been ] seen faintly
illuminated, recalling the aurora on earth. Henkel quotes Professor Young --
polar snows seem to be present."

8

Frode-

Here the NOAA people say " Instruments on board the NOAA Polar-orbiting
Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) continually monitor the power
flux carried by the protons and electrons that produce aurora." But they
can't measure the soft eletrons emanating from the interior, right? So what
are they measuring- the electrons which are present after the disintegration
which causes the auroral display?

This is my understanding, I just want to get a reality check.

Reality check passed! They can not see the soft electrons, only the effect of their presence.

Frode

···

http://sec.noaa.gov/pmap/Intro.html

The first page has some nice pics: http://sec.noaa.gov/pmap/

Dean

-

9

List Members,
August 13, 2000

You all know that recently I communicated directly with Joseph H. Cater
about the Hollow Planets Theory. One thing that I asked him about was the
testimony of Olaf Jansen with regards to a night side of the inner sun. He
didn't come out and endorse a " night " side of the inner sun, although he
mage a very interesting comment. First of all, I will reproduce an initial
statement by Olaf.

" the lights shining through these many openings [ at the base of the sun ]
twinkle at night in all their splendor, and seem to be stars, as natural as
the stars we saw shining when in our home at Stockholm, excepting that they
appear larger. ' The Smoky God, ' therefore, with each daily revolution of
the Earth, appears to come up in the East and go down in the West the same
as does our sun on the external surface. In reality, the people ' within
believe that ' The Smoky God ' is the throne of their Jehovah, and is
stationary. The effect of night and day is, therefore, produced by Earth's
daily rotation."

Cater wrote to me the following: " The side of the central sun facing the
real sun will receive slightly more particles from the inner shell than from
the opposite side. As a result, that side might be brighter than the
opposite side." I have never heard of an explanation of the night side of
the inner sun described by Olaf Jansen.

That Cater's understanding of low frequency photons, and their role in his
hollow Earth model, can explain the night side of the inner sun without even
breaking stride, is just amazing, and good news for hollow Earthers.
Now, the brighter side of the inner sun isn't so so bright in the first
place- Olaf will describe the brightness of the inner sun as being as bright
as two full moons. So if the side turned away from the sun of the solar
system were to become any dimmer due to a reduction of particles, then that
would bring about a de facto night.
Olaf describes an electrical nature to the light of the inner sun which does
not correspond to a sun of a nuclear process. Even the atmosphere of the
inner Earth was described by him as electrically charged:

" This great moisture and invigorating electrical light and warmth account
perhaps for the luxuriant vegetation, while the highly charged electrcal air
and the evenness of climatic conditions may have much to do with giant
growth and longevity of all animal life. In places the level valleys
stretched away for many miles in every direction. "The Smoky God", in its
clear white light, looked calmly down. There was an intoxication in the
electrically sucharged air that fanned the cheek as softly as a vanishing
whisper."

" In the meantime we had lost sight of the sun's rays, but we found a
radiance 'within ' emanating from the dull-red sun which had already
attracted our attention, now giving out a white light seemingly from a
cloud-bank far away in front of us. It dispensed a greater light, I should
say, than two full moons on the clearest night. In twelve hours this cloud
of whiteness would pass out of sight as if eclipsed, and the twelve hours
following corresponded with our night. We early learned that these strange
people were worshipers of this great cloud of light. It was ' The Smoky God
' of the ' Inner World.'".

The whole idea of a " Smokey God ," the description which Olaf gives to the
central sun, as well as this description of the central sun being " a great
cloud of light " seems to be Olaf's way of explaining the phenomenon of the
low frequency photons being repelled by the electrostatic gravity of the
inner surface towards the center of the cavity, where they tend to
congregate. That there would exist a smokey cloud around the sun could be
explained by the fact that the photons have a negative charge in the first
place, and therefore tend to repel off against each other before they
finally congregate in a disk-like form. It would only be the stronger
gravity of the inner surface which would induce the photons to finally come
together. The natural friction of this process would disintegrate some of
the photon aggragates, which would then release the visible electrons,
camouflaged within, to produce light proper. ( Frode Kvisle says " Pac-man
effect " )

Joseph H. Cater's understanding of ether science, and the low frequency
photons which such ethers form, can easily account for the nature and
behavior of the inner sun, as well as for the electrically charged
atmosphere of the inner Earth, which were all experienced by Olaf and Jens
Jansen.

http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm

10

List members,

A while ago I sent out the whole part of this post by Cater on the nature of
gravity in relation to spinning gyros, wheels and tops. I am sending, right
now, just the part which explains how low frequency negative charges,
unseen, get thrown out to the sides of horizontally spinning wheels and such
objects. Then, at the bottom, you all will see something which I cut and
pasted from Olaf Jansen's story about a type of public transportation which
he witnessed, and how it was lifted and propelled!

Here is Cater:

" The Searl effect is deeply involved with the behavior of everything that
spins on an axis. Consider the spinning top or gyro. Conventional science
has never come up with anything even remotely resembling an explanation
concerning its behavior. Physicists try to create the iilusion that they
understand it and camouflage their ignorance with nebulous descriptions of
its action accompanied by meaningless equations. A precessing gyro actually
confutes the basic foundations of conventional physics. For example, as it
precesses, its center of mass extends well beyond its point of contact with
the surface. It should tip over according to all the rules of academic
physics. What force prevents it? Also the moment of inerta in-creases with
the RPM, a property which is utilized for stabilizers. Also, according to
the ' laws ' of orthodox physics, the moment of inertia is constant.

The explanation becomes almost self-evident in the light of the principles
already expounded upon. AT A CRITICAL RPM, THE OUTER RIM BECOMES HEAVILY
CHARGED NEGATIVELY, WHICLE THE PORTION CLOSER TO THE CENTER OF MASS BEGINS
TO TAK ON A POSITIVE CHARGE. THE RIM TENDS TO BE REPELLED UPWARDS BY THE
EARTH'S GRAVITY. The total effect is a counterclockwise motion about the
point of contact, [ of the top or gyro on the floor ] which counterbalances
the clockwise torque tending to tip it over.

Now, here is what Olaf saw:

" we were taken overland to the city of ' Eden,' in a conveyance different
from anything we have in Europe or America. This vehicle was doubtless some
electrical contrivance. It was noiseless, and ran on a single iron rail in
perfect balance. The trip was made at a very high rate of speed. We were
carried up hills and down dales, across valleys and again along the sides of
steep mountains, without any apparent attempt having been made to level the
earth as we do for railroad tracks. The car seats were huge yet comfortable
affairs, and very high above the floor of the car. On the top of each car
were high geared fly wheels lying on their sides, [ CAN YOU ALL BELIEVE
THIS? ] which were so automatically adjusted that, as the speed of the car
increased, the high speed of these fly wheels geometrically increased. Jules
Galdea explained to us that these revolving fan-like wheels on top of the
cars destroyed atmospheric pressure, or what is generally understood by the
term gravitation, and with this force thus destroyed or rendered nugatory
the car is as safe from falling to one side or to other from the single ray
track as if it were in a vacuum; the fly wheels in their rapid revolutions
destrying effectually the so-called power of gravitation, or the force of
atmospheric pressure or whatever potent influence it may be that causes all
unsupported things to fall downward to the earth's surface or to the nearest
point of resistance."

11

This is wonderful information!
I enjoy your focus on this every day, though I don't write and say so everyday.
Even though some of it is more science than I am used to, I think I get the
drift.
Many thanks!
Nimueh

dean wrote:

···

List Members,
August 13, 2000

You all know that recently I communicated directly with Joseph H. Cater
about the Hollow Planets Theory. One thing that I asked him about was the
testimony of Olaf Jansen with regards to a night side of the inner sun. He
didn't come out and endorse a " night " side of the inner sun, although he
mage a very interesting comment. First of all, I will reproduce an initial
statement by Olaf.

" the lights shining through these many openings [ at the base of the sun ]
twinkle at night in all their splendor, and seem to be stars, as natural as
the stars we saw shining when in our home at Stockholm, excepting that they
appear larger. ' The Smoky God, ' therefore, with each daily revolution of
the Earth, appears to come up in the East and go down in the West the same
as does our sun on the external surface. In reality, the people ' within
believe that ' The Smoky God ' is the throne of their Jehovah, and is
stationary. The effect of night and day is, therefore, produced by Earth's
daily rotation."

Cater wrote to me the following: " The side of the central sun facing the
real sun will receive slightly more particles from the inner shell than from
the opposite side. As a result, that side might be brighter than the
opposite side." I have never heard of an explanation of the night side of
the inner sun described by Olaf Jansen.

That Cater's understanding of low frequency photons, and their role in his
hollow Earth model, can explain the night side of the inner sun without even
breaking stride, is just amazing, and good news for hollow Earthers.
Now, the brighter side of the inner sun isn't so so bright in the first
place- Olaf will describe the brightness of the inner sun as being as bright
as two full moons. So if the side turned away from the sun of the solar
system were to become any dimmer due to a reduction of particles, then that
would bring about a de facto night.
Olaf describes an electrical nature to the light of the inner sun which does
not correspond to a sun of a nuclear process. Even the atmosphere of the
inner Earth was described by him as electrically charged:

" This great moisture and invigorating electrical light and warmth account
perhaps for the luxuriant vegetation, while the highly charged electrcal air
and the evenness of climatic conditions may have much to do with giant
growth and longevity of all animal life. In places the level valleys
stretched away for many miles in every direction. "The Smoky God", in its
clear white light, looked calmly down. There was an intoxication in the
electrically sucharged air that fanned the cheek as softly as a vanishing
whisper."

" In the meantime we had lost sight of the sun's rays, but we found a
radiance 'within ' emanating from the dull-red sun which had already
attracted our attention, now giving out a white light seemingly from a
cloud-bank far away in front of us. It dispensed a greater light, I should
say, than two full moons on the clearest night. In twelve hours this cloud
of whiteness would pass out of sight as if eclipsed, and the twelve hours
following corresponded with our night. We early learned that these strange
people were worshipers of this great cloud of light. It was ' The Smoky God
' of the ' Inner World.'".

The whole idea of a " Smokey God ," the description which Olaf gives to the
central sun, as well as this description of the central sun being " a great
cloud of light " seems to be Olaf's way of explaining the phenomenon of the
low frequency photons being repelled by the electrostatic gravity of the
inner surface towards the center of the cavity, where they tend to
congregate. That there would exist a smokey cloud around the sun could be
explained by the fact that the photons have a negative charge in the first
place, and therefore tend to repel off against each other before they
finally congregate in a disk-like form. It would only be the stronger
gravity of the inner surface which would induce the photons to finally come
together. The natural friction of this process would disintegrate some of
the photon aggragates, which would then release the visible electrons,
camouflaged within, to produce light proper. ( Frode Kvisle says " Pac-man
effect " )

Joseph H. Cater's understanding of ether science, and the low frequency
photons which such ethers form, can easily account for the nature and
behavior of the inner sun, as well as for the electrically charged
atmosphere of the inner Earth, which were all experienced by Olaf and Jens
Jansen.

http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]