That post, or rather, those, about the tunnel systems under Peru just stay in my mind. The Incas seemed to have gone underground- in the case of the Aztecs, I think that it was/is very obvious.
They both practiced human sacrifice. Imagine what could happen to us were we to wander in the wrong neighborhoods.
I think that huge cities and civilizations exist way underground. Cater’s Hollow Earth model allows for this because it justifies the existence of luminosity and heat at great depths below. The process of redistribution of energy explains how particles from sunlight transform into lower frequency soft particles, orgone, and AS SUCH penetrate to deep depths. As they experience friction they break up into their constutent elements, i.e., photons of visible light. They capture hard particles within, which are the ones which give off warmth. When they, the soft particles, break up, they liberate their hard particles, too. Thus The-Man-That-Did-It in the book Etidorhpa reported an omnipresent luminosity at about 15 miles below the Earth’s surface, whereas it had been black. Here is one piece about that from Chapter 16 of Etidorhpa: http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index13.html
" I comprehend some of this," I replied; " but I am neither prepared to assent to nor dissent from your conclusions, and my mind is not clear as to whether your logic is good or bad. I am more ready to speak plainly about my own peculiar situation than to become absorbed in abstruse arguments in science, and I marvel more at the soft light that is here surrounding us than at the metaphysical reasoning in which you indulge."
" The child ignorant of letters wonders at the resources of those who can spell and read, and, in like manner, many obscure natural phenomena are marvelous to man only because of his ignorance. You do not comprehend the fact that sunlight is simply a matter-bred expression, an outburst of interrupted energy, and that the modification this energy undergoes makes it visible or sensible to man. What, think you, becomes of the flood of light energy that unceasingly flows from the sun? For ages, for an eternity, it has bathed this earth and seemingly streamed into space, and space it would seem must have long since have been filled with it, if, as men believe, space contains energy of any description. Man may say the earth casts the amount intercepted by it back into space, and yet does not your science teach that the great bulk of the earth is an absorber, and a poor radiator of light and heat? What think you, I repeat, becomes of the torrent of light and heat and other forces that radiate from the sun, the flood that strikes the earth? It disappears, and, in the economy of nature, is not replaced by any known force or ally known motion of matter. Think you that earth substance really presents an obstacle to the passage of the sun's energy? Is it not probable that most of this light producing essence, as a subtle fluid, passes through the surface of the earth and into its interior, as light does through space, and returns thence to the sun again, in a condition not discernible by man?" He grasped my arm and squeezed it as though to emphasize the words to follow. "You have used the term sunshine freely; tell me what is sunshine? Ah! you do not reply; well, what evidence have you to show that sunshine ( heat and light ) is not earth-bred, a condition that exists locally only, the result of contact between matter and some unknown force expression? What reason have you for accepting that, to other forms unknown and yet transparent to this energy, your sunshine may not be as intangible as the ether of space is to man? What reason have you to believe that a force torrent is not circulating to and from the sun and earth, inappreciable to man, excepting the mere trace of this force which, modified by contact action with matter appears as heat, light, and other force expressions? How can I, if this is true, in consideration of your ignorance, enter into details explanatory of the action that takes place between matter and a portion of this force, whereby in the earth, first at the surface, darkness is produced, and then deeper down an earth light that man can perceive by the sense of sight, as you now realize? I will only say that this luminous appearance about us is produced by a natural law, whereby the flood of energy, invisible to man, a something clothed now under the name of darkness, after streaming into the crust substance of the earth, is at this depth, revivified, and then is made apparent to mortal
eye, to be modified again as it emerges from the opposite earth crust, but not annihilated. For my vision, however, this central light is not a necessity; my physical and mental development is such that the energy of darkness is communicable; I can respond to its touches on my nerves, and hence I can guide you in this dark cavern. I am all eye."
" Ah! " I exclaimed, " that reminds me of a remark made by my former guide who, referring to the instinct of animals, spoke of that as a natural power undeveloped in man. Is it true that by mental cultivation a new sense can be evolved whereby darkness may become as light ?"
" Yes; that which you call light is a form of sensible energy to which the faculties of animals who live on the surface of the earth have become adapt°d, through their organs of sight. The sun's energy is modified when it strikes the surface of the earth; part is reflected, but most of it passes onward into the earth's substance, in an altered or disturbed condition.”
Members-
The above understanding is important. If we can’t explain heat and light at great depths, how are we going to conjecture that the Aztecs went below when they fled from Pizarro? Fled below to what? To stumble in darkness, huddle, and die of hunger?
Or to luminous worlds with vegetation and streams? How could it be so? Only Etidorhpa tells us, and Caters expounds on Etidorhpa to try to make it a bit more understandable for us.
Dharma/Dean
···
To: Members
From: Dharma/Dean
