Frode,
It is true that any line along the interior ridge of the polar opening would
appear as a straight line on a conventional map. Conventional maps don't
allow for a polar opening. The ridge is therefore misplaced on conventional
maps, as are all reference points in the polar regions misplaced because of
the polar opening factor. The ridge is perceived as a straight line to those
unaware of the polar opening, whereas, it is actually a concave circular line
around the interior rim of the polar opening. When this supposed location of
the ridge on conventional maps is curled around the rim of the polar opening,
then the 1500 mile arc along the rim has a striking resemblance to the arc of
the path of the magnetic north pole. The Russian Scientists have mapped the
Lomonosov Ridge, the Russian Hollow Earth theorists have made the connection
to the magnetic declanation path. It's just all part of the process of
solving the big riddle.
Norlan
Frode,
It is true that any line along the interior ridge of the polar opening would
appear as a straight line on a conventional map. Conventional maps don't
allow for a polar opening. The ridge is therefore misplaced on conventional
maps, as are all reference points in the polar regions misplaced because of
the polar opening factor. The ridge is perceived as a straight line to those
unaware of the polar opening, whereas, it is actually a concave circular line
around the interior rim of the polar opening. When this supposed location of
the ridge on conventional maps is curled around the rim of the polar opening,
then the 1500 mile arc along the rim has a striking resemblance to the arc of
the path of the magnetic north pole. The Russian Scientists have mapped the
Lomonosov Ridge, the Russian Hollow Earth theorists have made the connection
to the magnetic declanation path. It's just all part of the process of
solving the big riddle.
Norlan
Thanks!
It certainly is not easy to see through all the wrong information sometimes. I thought that the map was quit close to the real world, just that it missed the hole and maybe some islands. Do you know of Amundsen's expedition where he went from Svalbard to the north-pole and then to Alaska. Shouldn't he be quite close to the opening? Were there any anomalies mentioned in regard to that trip?
Frode
Frode,
Amudsen wondered off course, into Russia, about 100 miles. This suggests
that he dipped into the bowl-like side of the entrance, then back up.
He noted warmer temperatures near the pole.
The one who knows about Amudsen is Rod of www.ourhollowearth.com
I'll try to double check with him.
Dharma/Dean
Frode,
Here is some stuff from Rod's article The Size and Location of the Polar
Openings: http://www.ourhollowearth.com/PolarOpn.htm
" The Amundsen dirigible transpolar flight of 1926 from Spitzbergen to the
Pole and from the Pole to about 100 miles west of Point Barrow, Alaska would
indicate the north polar opening would need to be located to one side of
their line of flight.
...
This estimated location would place the opening on the Russian side of
Amundsen's line of flight from the Pole to Alaska, and yet also be in the
line of sight of the direction that Admiral Peary sighted the mirage of
Crocker land from the west coast of Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada.
Indicative that the curve into the opening has already begun near the pole
is Amundsen's navigator error upon reaching Alaska. They had assumed a
straight line of flight from Spitzbergen to the Pole and from the Pole to
Point Barrow, Alaska, but upon arriving in Alaska were surprised that they
were around a 100 miles too far west of Point Barrow, closer towards the
Bering Sea that they didn't even see Point Barrow. This may indicate that
near the pole they had actually dipped somewhat down into the polar opening
causing their straight line of flight to be skewed."
dean wrote:
Frode,
Here is some stuff from Rod's article The Size and Location of the Polar
Openings: http://www.ourhollowearth.com/PolarOpn.htm" The Amundsen dirigible transpolar flight of 1926 from Spitzbergen to the
Pole and from the Pole to about 100 miles west of Point Barrow, Alaska would
indicate the north polar opening would need to be located to one side of
their line of flight....
This estimated location would place the opening on the Russian side of
Amundsen's line of flight from the Pole to Alaska, and yet also be in the
line of sight of the direction that Admiral Peary sighted the mirage of
Crocker land from the west coast of Ellesmere Island in Northern Canada.Indicative that the curve into the opening has already begun near the pole
is Amundsen's navigator error upon reaching Alaska. They had assumed a
straight line of flight from Spitzbergen to the Pole and from the Pole to
Point Barrow, Alaska, but upon arriving in Alaska were surprised that they
were around a 100 miles too far west of Point Barrow, closer towards the
Bering Sea that they didn't even see Point Barrow. This may indicate that
near the pole they had actually dipped somewhat down into the polar opening
causing their straight line of flight to be skewed."To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Dean,
Just a comment on tempertures in the polar regions,do any infered
photos exist any where?
if they do warmer air must show polar entrances clearly.
On a different note ,for three or four months I have read an alot of
different
material on hollowearth and commend all sites on the net involved and if
a
summary of all material was put in front of investigative journalist
that
make documentaries for tv (this is one hell of a story)
Our awareness is aroused by Jules Verne remakes and at the moment in
New Zealand Peter Jackson is directing a triogy of Tolkins Lord of the
Rings.
To raise awareness to level where people will actively persue full
discovery of inner earth( earths last great challange )this needs to
get on TV.I can see someone like Virgin Records Richard Branston
heading an exploration ,an interestig thought.any one got contacts in
the television community???
best regards
David
David,
This is an old, old post which I kept from Jan's list on an infrared plar
imaging site.
Try it, but don't expect much. They censor all these things. We have an old
post in the archives about censoring of Arctic photos and such, I'll try to
find it and point it out, but maybe tomorrow.
Dean
Here is the old post:
I found this website, maintained by the Uni of Iowa, which
seems to archive infrared
images of the polar regions.
http://eiger.physics.uiowa.edu/~vis/images/
I haven't had much time to check through it
all, but it seems to contain some great
images.
Maybe someone can have a closer look and find
some anomalous images among the lot.
We could even attempt to get in touch with
these guys and ask for better images or
close-ups or any type of interesting info.
Any volunteers?
cheers all
HJS
Dean,
Just a comment on tempertures in the polar regions,do any infered
photos exist any where?
if they do warmer air must show polar entrances clearly.
By the way david, I don't know how long you have been on this list but, with
reference to the Antartic opening, I have some images up on an auxiliary
page at: http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index19.html
The last two are interesting:
The next to the last one was picked up by Rod M. Cluff from the Radarsat
Mapping program, and shows an area of poor resonance. In other words, a
hole.
The second one shows the ozone hole, the darkest part of the splotch having
the least ozone.
The rays of the inner sun are not deemed to have ultraviolet in them, so
they do not produce ozone.
There you have the opening, they both match.
I'm gone in a hurry until Sunday!
Dharma/Dean
Dean,
Just a comment on tempertures in the polar regions,do any infered
photos exist any where?
if they do warmer air must show polar entrances clearly.
David,
I can't find that old post that I was looking for- I think that I made it on
another list. But I presented an e-letter sent to me by will Rhea- he told
me that his uncle had worked for the Nationa Weather Bureau during the
beginning of the satellite age, and that his uncle told him that all weather
satellite photos were censured, in real time, before being turned over to
the Waether Bureau, and that some photos had black areas blotted out.
The point? You can't trust much Arctic info that you get from NASA, the
military, or any formal institution, for that matter, since around the
beginning of the 1900s. Peary and MacMillan told a few things, Cook was much
more honest. Nansen seemed to be quite frank about certain info. Fopr
example, temperature anomalies, compass anomalies, polar warming, fox tracks
near the pole, etc., were all encountered by the crew as a whole- so how
would he lie about things? He couldn't lie very much, except maybe about the
part where he went off with Johansen in his failed atetempt to reach the
pole, but who knows. His book, Farthest North, which seels in Barnes &
Noble for about $12.oo, mentions quite a few anomalies. I summed them up in
the article Seven Days North of Tibet:
http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html
But anyone can get the book and check it out. I have a list of all the
anomalies in the book, by page number and with a quote to find it by, and
I'll e - mail it to anyone who wants it and that wants to buy the book to
find out for him or herself.
I checked the readouts from all of the AWS Automatic Weather Stations near
the Antartic area where the Radarsat map, with the red circle, which Rod
Cluff found, to see if any strange temperature patterns showed up, but
nothing was unusual. I compared several years. But who can trust their
information? The powers-that-be have had time to infiltrate and manipulate.
Dharma/Dean