[allplanets-hollow] The Pole Reached?/Can't tell

Norlan,

Could the changing field have to do with our moon and/or the planets of our
solar system? Are reliable records of when the fields change?

My personal experience with the HET. Ten-years ago was the first time someone
mentioned the HET to me; then 5-years later, then about three-years ago. With
the advent of the Internet I think news is/will spread very fast. I have
learned more about it through the net. The net gives me more freedom to speak
on this topic, because you have an easily accessible source to refer people
to, that way I don't have to spend so much time and take the risk of selling
the theory; let them do the research and decide for themselves.

I've had one experience at my workplace of telling others about the theory
with enthusiasm, and someone used it against me. So I am more selective in
whom and how I approach the subject from now on.

MM

Sports Fans,

Here is some interesting stuff from The Hollow Earth by Raymond Bernard.

One thing I'll say- the fact that hyenas are found in the polar area encased
in ice has much significance. It means that even if we got past the NATO
boys and polar bears on this side of the opening, we would have to deal with
tropical wild animals on the other side. I don't know which is worse. How
many bullets can you carry with you?

Posted by Dean/Dharma

Here it is:

ORIGIN OF THE MAMMOTH

Gardner claims that the mammouth and elephant-like creatures of tropical
origin found frozen in the Arctic ice, which is derived from fresh water,
are really animals from the interior of the Earth that came to the surface
and became frozen, and are not prehistoric animals as commonly supposed.
Gardner's theory of the subterranian origin of the mammoth found
confirmation in Admiral Byrd's observation of a living mammouth during his
1,700 mile flight into the land beyond the North Pole, within the polar
opening.

Gardner claims that these strange animals not known on the Earth's surface
were carried by rivers from the Earth's interior, freezing within the ice
which was then formed. This theory seems very reasonable, in view of the ice
being formed from fresh water not found in the Arctic Ocean. Since this ice,
like icebergs, could not have been formed by ocean water, the only
explanation is that it comes from other water- fresh water rivers flowing
out through the polar opening from the Earth's interior.

Since these animals are found inside of icebergs, which are composed of
fresh water, this water, like the animals frozen in the ice it forms on
reaching the surface and exposed to its lower temperature, must come from
the Earth's interior. Gardner speaks of herds of mammoths, elephants and
other tropical animals which, when they venture out to the colder regions
near the rim of the polar opening, together with glaciers which form there
from water in the interior- flowing outward and freezing- become frozen in
the ice. Or they might fall into crevasses, perhaps concealed by snow, and
the moment they fall in, they will be covered by snow and snow water from
the ice from above and hermetically sealed in the ice. This would account
for the fresh condition in which these mammouths frozen in the ice are found
after these glaciers have worked their way over the rim 0f the polar opening
and out to the Siberian wastes where these frozen animals are found in
perfectly fresh and edible condition.

Robert B. Cook tells of the remains not only of mammoths , but of hairy
rhinoceros, reindeer, hippopotamus, lion and hyena, found in Northen
glacial deposits. He claims that these animals which were unable to endure
cold weather were either summer visitors during the severity of the glacial
period or permanent residents when the country had a warmer climate. But
Garner maintains that these animals came from inside the Earth for the
following reason: " Since the reindeer, lion, and hyena are present day
forms of life and not as old as the mammoth ( at least in the form in which
we know them today and in which these remains show them to have been when
they were alive ), it is evident that these animals visited the spots where
their remains were found not from southerly climates during early glacial
epochs, but that they are visitors from the land of the interior. Otherwise,
these present-day forms would not be found alongside those of the mammoth
which we have shown to be a present day inhabitant of the interior of the
Earth. Not knowing this, Mr. Cook has great difficulty in explaining the
occurrence together of these forms which, in his view, are earlier and later
forms of life. But when we shall see that they are really contemporaneous
( and both came from the interior of the earth ), the difficulty vanishes."

In the stomach of the mammoth was found undigested food consisting of young
shoots of pine and fir and young fir cones. In others are found fern and
tropical vegetation. How could na Arctic animal have tropical food in its
stomach. One explanation is that the Arctic region once had a tropical
climate, and that a shift of the Earth on its axis suddenly brought on the
Ice Age and changed the climate to a frigid one.

This theory has been offered to explain both the tropical vegetation in the
stomach of the frozen Arctic animals and the fact that many of these huge
animals were of tropical species, related to elephants. Great deposits of
elephant tusks were found in Siberia as evidence of the then northern
habitat of the tropical animals. But there is another theory to explain
these facts: that these tropical animals came from the interior of the
Earth, which has a tropical climate, coming out through the North polar
opening. On reaching the north exterior with its Arctic climate they froze,
since they were unaccustomed such a cold climate. This is the theory held by
Ray Palmer, who does not accept the idea that these animals died in
prehistoric times as a result of a shifting of the Earth on its axis. He
says:

" True the death must have been sudden, but it was not because the Arctic
was previously tropical and suddenly changed to a frigid climate. The sudden
coming of the Ice Age was not the cause of death. The cause of death was
Arctic in nature, and could have have occurred any time, even recently.
Since the Ice Age there have bem no mammoths in the known world, unless they
exist in the mysterious land beyond the Pole, where one of them was actually
seen alive by members of the Byrd expedition!

We have taken the mammoth as a rather sensational modern evidence of Byrd's
mysterious land, but there are many lesser proofs that na unknown
originating point exists somewhere in the Northern regions.

One reknowned Guru that I know of lived most of his life in the forests of
India. There he lived in such a state of peace and true unity with all life,
that it was known that ferocious tigers would come and curl up at his feet.

If we gain a true state of enlightenment before attempting our passage, we will
carry with us harmony with all life, and there will not be a need for weapons on
this level.
Nimueh

dean wrote:

ยทยทยท

Sports Fans,

Here is some interesting stuff from The Hollow Earth by Raymond Bernard.

One thing I'll say- the fact that hyenas are found in the polar area encased
in ice has much significance. It means that even if we got past the NATO
boys and polar bears on this side of the opening, we would have to deal with
tropical wild animals on the other side. I don't know which is worse. How
many bullets can you carry with you?

Posted by Dean/Dharma

Here it is:

ORIGIN OF THE MAMMOTH

Gardner claims that the mammouth and elephant-like creatures of tropical
origin found frozen in the Arctic ice, which is derived from fresh water,
are really animals from the interior of the Earth that came to the surface
and became frozen, and are not prehistoric animals as commonly supposed.
Gardner's theory of the subterranian origin of the mammoth found
confirmation in Admiral Byrd's observation of a living mammouth during his
1,700 mile flight into the land beyond the North Pole, within the polar
opening.

Gardner claims that these strange animals not known on the Earth's surface
were carried by rivers from the Earth's interior, freezing within the ice
which was then formed. This theory seems very reasonable, in view of the ice
being formed from fresh water not found in the Arctic Ocean. Since this ice,
like icebergs, could not have been formed by ocean water, the only
explanation is that it comes from other water- fresh water rivers flowing
out through the polar opening from the Earth's interior.

Since these animals are found inside of icebergs, which are composed of
fresh water, this water, like the animals frozen in the ice it forms on
reaching the surface and exposed to its lower temperature, must come from
the Earth's interior. Gardner speaks of herds of mammoths, elephants and
other tropical animals which, when they venture out to the colder regions
near the rim of the polar opening, together with glaciers which form there
from water in the interior- flowing outward and freezing- become frozen in
the ice. Or they might fall into crevasses, perhaps concealed by snow, and
the moment they fall in, they will be covered by snow and snow water from
the ice from above and hermetically sealed in the ice. This would account
for the fresh condition in which these mammouths frozen in the ice are found
after these glaciers have worked their way over the rim 0f the polar opening
and out to the Siberian wastes where these frozen animals are found in
perfectly fresh and edible condition.

Robert B. Cook tells of the remains not only of mammoths , but of hairy
rhinoceros, reindeer, hippopotamus, lion and hyena, found in Northen
glacial deposits. He claims that these animals which were unable to endure
cold weather were either summer visitors during the severity of the glacial
period or permanent residents when the country had a warmer climate. But
Garner maintains that these animals came from inside the Earth for the
following reason: " Since the reindeer, lion, and hyena are present day
forms of life and not as old as the mammoth ( at least in the form in which
we know them today and in which these remains show them to have been when
they were alive ), it is evident that these animals visited the spots where
their remains were found not from southerly climates during early glacial
epochs, but that they are visitors from the land of the interior. Otherwise,
these present-day forms would not be found alongside those of the mammoth
which we have shown to be a present day inhabitant of the interior of the
Earth. Not knowing this, Mr. Cook has great difficulty in explaining the
occurrence together of these forms which, in his view, are earlier and later
forms of life. But when we shall see that they are really contemporaneous
( and both came from the interior of the earth ), the difficulty vanishes."

In the stomach of the mammoth was found undigested food consisting of young
shoots of pine and fir and young fir cones. In others are found fern and
tropical vegetation. How could na Arctic animal have tropical food in its
stomach. One explanation is that the Arctic region once had a tropical
climate, and that a shift of the Earth on its axis suddenly brought on the
Ice Age and changed the climate to a frigid one.

This theory has been offered to explain both the tropical vegetation in the
stomach of the frozen Arctic animals and the fact that many of these huge
animals were of tropical species, related to elephants. Great deposits of
elephant tusks were found in Siberia as evidence of the then northern
habitat of the tropical animals. But there is another theory to explain
these facts: that these tropical animals came from the interior of the
Earth, which has a tropical climate, coming out through the North polar
opening. On reaching the north exterior with its Arctic climate they froze,
since they were unaccustomed such a cold climate. This is the theory held by
Ray Palmer, who does not accept the idea that these animals died in
prehistoric times as a result of a shifting of the Earth on its axis. He
says:

" True the death must have been sudden, but it was not because the Arctic
was previously tropical and suddenly changed to a frigid climate. The sudden
coming of the Ice Age was not the cause of death. The cause of death was
Arctic in nature, and could have have occurred any time, even recently.
Since the Ice Age there have bem no mammoths in the known world, unless they
exist in the mysterious land beyond the Pole, where one of them was actually
seen alive by members of the Byrd expedition!

We have taken the mammoth as a rather sensational modern evidence of Byrd's
mysterious land, but there are many lesser proofs that na unknown
originating point exists somewhere in the Northern regions.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]