Thanks again, Frode.
Not that I'm a skeptic. I'd rather think of it as being the devil's advocate
in revealing the weaknesses of some of the arguments which are intended to
support the theory. I don't think we should base our beliefs and draw our
conclusions on a faulty set of premises and observations. And I don't think
we should be trying to persuade others to accept these concepts, or at least
entertain them, by quoting faulty examples.
We are all on the same side here in building up this monument of discovery.
Please, just tolerate me in striving to be the mortar between the bricks.
A humble observer,
Norlan