Dean, the Mercator map cannot be trusted. That is the crux of the Arno Peters
map.
Mike
Dean, the Mercator map cannot be trusted. That is the crux of
the Arno Peters
map.
Mike
It may represent an attempt to map an area which actually
"inside" the polar opening. Distorted, inaccurate (as
cartographers and those whom they listened to didn't realise that
they were inside the planet), but nevertheless indicative of a
strong belief that "another" land, region, or habitable space of
extensive size was accessible at the top of the world.
--Mike M.
···
--- In [email protected], mm48ny@a... wrote:
Mike Mott,
Very good point. I think that explorers imagine that they are over the open
part of the opening, due to the inward slope and vis-a-vis their celestial
navigation when, in reality, they are not at that point, only somewhere
along the downward slope. A Mercator map could hide this.
What is the address of that map again? I zapped it but I would like to look
again.
Dharma/Dean
···
It may represent an attempt to map an area which actually
"inside" the polar opening. Distorted, inaccurate (as
cartographers and those whom they listened to didn't realise that
they were inside the planet), but nevertheless indicative of a
strong belief that "another" land, region, or habitable space of
extensive size was accessible at the top of the world.--Mike M
Mike Mott,
So Arno Peters came up with a more reliable map or is Arno's map a Mercator?
I'm sorry that none of this sunk in earlier, but now it is hitting me like a
ton of bricks.
Dharma/Dean
···
> Dean, the Mercator map cannot be trusted. That is the crux of
the Arno Peters
> map.
>
> MikeIt may represent an attempt to map an area which actually
"inside" the polar opening. Distorted, inaccurate (as
cartographers and those whom they listened to didn't realise that
they were inside the planet), but nevertheless indicative of a
strong belief that "another" land, region, or habitable space of
extensive size was accessible at the top of the world.--Mike M.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
--- In [email protected], "Dean" <0108@t...>
wrote:
Mike Mott,
Very good point. I think that explorers imagine that they are over
the open
part of the opening, due to the inward slope and vis-a-vis their
celestial
navigation when, in reality, they are not at that point, only
somewhere
along the downward slope. A Mercator map could hide this.
What is the address of that map again? I zapped it but I would
like to look
again.
Dharma/Dean
http://www.civilization.ca/membrs/canhist/frobisher/images/frbef
02b.jpg
http://www.civilization.ca/membrs/canhist/frobisher/images/frbef
This map website doesn't go anywhere...
···
----- Original Message -----
From:
Michael Mott
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Mercator Polar Map again
`--- In [email protected] , "Dean" <0108@t...>
wrote:Mike Mott,
Very good point. I think that explorers imagine that they are over
the open
part of the opening, due to the inward slope and vis-a-vis their
celestial
navigation when, in reality, they are not at that point, only
somewhere
along the downward slope. A Mercator map could hide this.What is the address of that map again? I zapped it but I would
like to look
again.Dharma/Dean
http://www.civilization.ca/membrs/canhist/frobisher/images/frbef
02b.jpg`
` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]`
MJ,
You'll notice that the end of the address is on the next line: 02b.jpeg
Dharma/Dean
···
http://www.civilization.ca/membrs/canhist/frobisher/images/frbef
This map website doesn't go anywhere...
----- Original Message -----
From:
Michael Mott
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Mercator Polar Map again
`--- In [email protected] , "Dean" <0108@t...>
wrote:
> Mike Mott,Very good point. I think that explorers imagine that they are over
the open
part of the opening, due to the inward slope and vis-a-vis their
celestial
navigation when, in reality, they are not at that point, only
somewhere
along the downward slope. A Mercator map could hide this.What is the address of that map again? I zapped it but I would
like to look
again.Dharma/Dean
http://www.civilization.ca/membrs/canhist/frobisher/images/frbef
02b.jpg`
` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]`
` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]`
--- In [email protected], "Michael-Jon"
<mijon@m...> wrote:
http://www.civilization.ca/membrs/canhist/frobisher/images/frbef
This map website doesn't go anywhere...
The egroups message tool cuts off the last piece, which you
have to add or key in yourself:
http://www.civilization.ca/membrs/canhist/frobisher/images/frbef
02b.jpg
Note the 02b.jpg which is bumped to the next line when pasted.
--Mike
Dean,
Thank you, when I tried to click on the entire two lines it wouldn't work, so I added it and I see it. What am I looking at? I've included the picture...m-j
MJ,
First of all, I think that you are looking at an artist's conception, supposedly of the land which lies inside the hole, just that it has been turned out at the poles.
I don't really know the origin, nor how much stock we can take in it, but it is food for thought.
Dharma/Dean
···
Dean,
Thank you, when I tried to click on the entire two lines it wouldn't work, so I added it and I see it. What am I looking at? I've included the picture...m-j
List Members,
Below, on page 171 of The Awesome Life Force, Joseph H. Cater explains the basic mechanism by which the water droplets in clouds, albeit microscopic, absorb negative charges. When water droplets absorb negative charges they experience repiulsion from the negative electrostatic charge within the Earth's crust and tend to float. This is antigravity- thus does gravity actually exhibit repulsion.
Of course, if you don't know what gravity is and how it works, you won't be able to recognise the true cause and nature of the phenomenon, you'll end up crowning yourself a PhD. and start speculating about warps and such like a bat out of hell.
In order to substantiate the HET it is very important to understand gravity. If the Earth is hollow, people want to know why the shell of the Earth doesn't collapse in on itself, and why underground caverns 100s of miles down don't collapse under the weight. Only gravity as an electrostatic charge, with limited penetration below the Earth's surface, can reconcile such seeming paradoxes. You have to be able to explain what you believe.
In the rest of the chapter Mr. Cater more fully explains how it is that water acquires a negative charge, and about the atmospheric dust, too:
" A paradox seems to exist with regard to clouds. They consist of small
water droplets that do not fall. From the standpoint of the properties of
water just presented, they should fall. Every water droplet is attached to
a dust particle. This dust particle absorbs a high concentration of nega
five charges from the water. The particle would levitate upward, were it
were not for the water droplet holding it down. If the amount of water
around this dust particle exceeds the critical amount, the droplet will fall
as rain. Outer space is permeated with fine dust that continually replaces
the dust taken out of the atmosphere by precipitation. This dust is vital
to sustaining life on a planet. Without it, there would be little or no
precipitation.
Under certain conditions, water can lose weight and even levitate. Ex
periments have shown that water, when ejected in the form of fine jets,
will start to levitate after falling a certain distance. Also, the fine spray
resulting from waterfalls often has a tendency to levitate upwards. This
phenomenon has puzzled many observers. By now the reason is obvious.
Such conditions cause the water droplets to be impregnated with an inor
dinate concentration of soft electrons. Also, the turbulence causes a greater number of hard electrons to be released within the water."
Members- don't forget to voyte at the gravity poll, yes, no or maybe.
http://www.egroups.com/polls/allplanets-hollow
Dharma/Dean