I do appreciate the inspiring nature of the conversation, but let's keep it
on topic. If not, the idea of not staying on topic will come back to haunt
me in the future if I try to invoke being on topic.. You guys know.
DD
In a message dated 5/9/01 4:35:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> And if you want to go through life thinking Christ would ever endorse
> drinking or smoking, you're a fool. How can the Lord send the
Comforter,
the
> Holy Ghost, to a person, if that person is catching a buzz off of
Miller
···
> Genuine Draft, or on a nicotine high?
>
> Give me a break!
>
> Blake
He will use a nicotene addicted vessle if seeds need planting....He will
change the vessels desires...We go to him,and he transforms us...
How can planets have a depression like Mars does right at the poles and not
be hollow? Of course it's indicative of an opening.
The traditional explanation that the polar depressions on Mars ( and other
planets ) are actually huge impact craters is not tenable. An impact crater
would have a depth which corresponds to its diameter, which this one doesn't
seem to have. An impact capable of producing a depression which is a
significant percentage of a planet's diameter would break the planet
asunder. And how do we explain the fact that Mars has two similar craters at
the polar points, nearly the exact opposite of each other?
Remember that you can always use the daily digest so as not to get
overwhelmed by the number of posts.
Also, people who post should keep an appropriate title up so that others can
know which thread it is just by looking at the title. Even within a thread,
change the title so that people know that it is an ongoing answer.
Dean, you know modern science. Scientists have vehemently fought against us
on this theory, and have convinced the general public that we are nuts. So
to save face they must find more and new ways to explain why there previous
theory would have worked, but some new discovery modifies that, but it would
work if it were not for this new discovery. They will keep doing this until
the general public and/or evidence becomes so glaring that it can't be
ignored.
How can planets have a depression like Mars does right at the poles and not
be hollow? Of course it's indicative of an opening.
The traditional explanation that the polar depressions on Mars ( and other
planets ) are actually huge impact craters is not tenable. An impact crater
would have a depth which corresponds to its diameter, which this one doesn't
seem to have. An impact capable of producing a depression which is a
significant percentage of a planet's diameter would break the planet
asunder. And how do we explain the fact that Mars has two similar craters at
the polar points, nearly the exact opposite of each other?