List members,
I recently corresponded with someone about that letter I got from Mr. Cater.
Pertinent points-
He confirmed my understanding on it, except that I thought that the internal
sun would give of a little more light.
* Well, the internal sun could give off a noteworthy amount of light. After
all, it is visible as a ball. It is just that light is mostly generated
within the atmospehre of the hollow portion.
I have a little problem with the big sized hole though.
* One thing that stumps other thinkers is this- they think that, if the
orifice is large, then how come we don't see the inner sun shining out?
Therefore, they speculate about a hole so narrow that clouds can clog it,
and about the possibility of a crooked tunnel opening. Since they don't
understand soft particles, what else are they going to think? They have to
fool around with the size of the opening because they cannot substantiate
the fact that no light is seen.
The conspiracy has to be a little bigger than think possible if they are
able to hide away such a hole.
* And I bet it is. I bet it is economic, academic, political and that the
media is heavily infiltrated. They've been working on it for a long time, at
least all of the 20th century. And the fact that the world is hollow
probably came to the attention of the powers-that-be-right around the turn
of the century 100 years ago.
There was just one guy from Norway coming home from a trip over the pole
from Siberia over to Canada. He even had a special suit with him so that he
could swim over open water to save time. None of these guys are reporting
any navigation problems.
* Compass anomalies are accepted and admitted, though.
* Notice that the Norwegian fellow ( is his name Hagar? ) didn't venture
towards the other side of the Pole. Nobody ever goes over on that side. The
Jeanette hit ice at 70* above Wrangel Island, and drifted gradually upwards
in latitude until 77* above the New Siberian Islands. The was no opening. At
the North Pole, there is no opening. But the curvature sure does get steep
there, not even flat, but curving. Pictures of the Pole show that the
horizon drops off quickly. This means that the opening is between the Pole-
and not too far from it because of the curvature anomaly- and the mid
seventy degrees of latitude where the Jeanette cut across. So there is roo
for it to easily be a couple hundred miles wide, and a good six hundred
miles long between the New Siberian Islands and Elizabeth Island. The
curvature anomalies support this.
* Again, the only problem is that some thinkers can't explain why there is
no sunshine emanating out of the hole, so they make it small and narrow.
Did Cater write something else of interest?
* He talked about craters on the Moon and their formation, just repeated
what the book says.
* And he said that he doesn't trust the figures given by NASA when they say
they bounced radar off the Moon in order to arrive at a distance figure.
Posted by Dharma/Dean