Dick,
It is apparent that this List gang has not picked up Churchward's
works. You do so well in interpreting his tenents. I read all his
works and in one of his works he goes into the history of Very ancient
symbology that clearly supports the Lumuria/Mu contention. Keep kicking
Dick, maybe they'll get this yet, in the meantime I hope you don't
destroy your keyboard responding! Happy Easter....
ps/lv
···
From: Dick Fojut <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Questioning the current accepted Earth Model
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 19:36:37 -0700Dean,
Did you get Pari Spolter's book yet?
Here she question the current accepted Earth Model (page 119):
" This currently accepted Earth Model is inconsistent with the law of
sedimentation in a centrifuge. The earth has been rotating for some
4.5 billion years. When it was first formed , the earth was in a
molten state and was rotating faster than today. The highest density
of matter should have migrated to the outer layers. Except for the
inner core, which houses the engine, powered by a nuclear reaction
and which keeps our planet rotating, The density of the outer layer
of the earth should be less than 3 g cm-3.Also heavy elements are rare in the universe. How could so much of
materials with such low stellar abundances have concentrated in the
earth's interior?"Frode... From (non-"scientist") Dick Fojut. I don't know what Dean is
going to reply, but I must! That typical "scientific" gibberish needs
commenting on. Here's another dissertation. Quit now if you can't go
on...In my eyes the above "Earth Model" is "junk science"
The "currently accepted Earth model" the author mentions may be an
"accepted" THEORY but it is still just a THEORY... unproven
conjecture, an imaginary concept.... not a proven fact. I don't give
a hoot how many "I like to be orthodox" university professors embrace
that gibberish. In my opinion, it is just ridiculous mumble-jumble by
kindergarten thinkers. Unfortunately the above doesn't give us
Spoiler's version. Too bad for the moment.But some of these terms really turn me off.... "law of sedimentation
in a centrifuge"? And how do they know the earth was in a molten
state and rotating faster than it is today? Because they IMAGINE it
was rotating faster? "rotating for 4.5 billion years"? How did they
time it? Just conjecture. Typical "scientists," they throw out words
like BILLIONS (even TRILLIONS) because it impresses the public."the inner core, which houses the engine, powered by a nuclear reaction" Bunk!
Recall the PBS astronomy series I mentioned watching 30 years back.
If there was an imagined nuclear reaction going on in the center of
our Sun, huge quantities of NEUTRINOS, theoretically, should have
been produced and radiated outward toward Earth. But the equipment in
a deep mine Scientists had set up, recorded very few neutrinos over
many years. Because of this, the commenting university scientist
expressed doubt that nuclear reactions were HOW the Sun is generating
its "energy." We just don't know, he said. Further, he commented - as
I recall - (presumably speaking for all scientists in general) "We
have to re-think our ideas about what is happening in the Sun." How
quickly that was forgotten by "Science!" Except by listeners like me.And HOW does such a "nuclear reaction" keep our planet rotating? Just
how? I get the impression some of these "scientists" just burble out
words that SOUND scientific, but are so UNimaginative they can't even
PICTURE what is supposed to happen with their words.Compare the above with James Churchward about HOW Earth is rotated.
(Yes, again)... He described the Sun's magnetic Forces as attracting
(pulling) out affinitive Forces held in Earth's crust, its (battery)
"storage house." At dawn, the Sun's more powerful magnetic Forces
carried by its rays, pulled Earth's forces saturating the dawn
quadrant of the crust, out into Earth's atmosphere.The Earth's "central" magnet (an area many miles down in the crust)
unsuccessfully resisted, trying to HOLD ON to its Forces, and holding
on found its dawn surface pulled along, DRAGGED ALONG BY SLIPPAGE,
trying to hold on... ROTATING forward. According to Churchward our
Sun has NO direct magnetic control over Earth's ELEMENTS (and
surface) only a special magnetic PULLING affinity for similar
magnetic Forces stored in the crust. One special set of the Sun's
magnetic forces have only one function, to DRAW out Earth's forces
that are saturating the crust, out into the atmosphere.Once Earth's many Forces are pulled free from the crust and have
saturated the atmospheric elements' HOLDING capacity for Forces,
those specialized magnetic drawing forces from the Sun lose any
sustained grip.... and other of the Sun's magnetic forces take
charge. Certain affinitive forces agitate Earth's LIGHT forces into
activity and we have light. Other of the Sun's affinitive forces
agitate Earth's HEAT forces into activity and we have heat. And
multitudes of Nature's other specialized forces go into movement, the
Sun's forces "marrying" and agitating them.(Yes, if you agree with Churchward, the "Great Designer" has assigned
special duties to every vibrating, unseen force emanating from
Himself, the Creator... the one great Primary "force" in the
universe.)The pulled along, rotation of Earth's first quadrant exposes the next
surface quadrant to the Sun's drawing rays... repeating what
happened to the first quadrant. Each appearing dawn quadrant is
pulled along, rotated. And so it has been and will ever more
continue as long as we have the Sun. Each dawn quadrant of the
surface is drawn along, trying to hold on to its forces, and ROTATED.Now whether you accept the above scenario (and hopefully picture it)
or not, it is at least logical and it functions. One can picture each
dawn surface quadrant being magnetically "pulled" along (as if on a
string) and rotated. But what picture does "nuclear reaction keeps
our planet rotating." show your mind? A bit incomplete, isn't it?Just a few comments I felt were proper to make. Thanks for reading.
- Dick Fojut in Tucson
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com