DD,
I couldn't click in from the email, what is the site for "planets?"
I couldn't click in from the email, what is the site for "planets?"
Whoops!
I mean click here to check out the planets:
DD
I've put some new pictures up in relation to the Olaf Jansen narration, on
this page of the site, including their view of the inner sun. Do take a
look.
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index6.html
Dean/Djarmapada
Recently I quoted the following paragraphs from Cater to the effect that a
subtle body could be orbiting near the Sun, creating a gravitational force
which interferes with a uniform flow of material around the equator.
" One of the phenomena concerning the Sun which completely baffles all of
the scientists is that it seems to rotate faster at the equator than it does
in the higher latitudes. The sunspots in the vicinity of the equator make a
revolution about the sun in less time than those in the higher latitudes.
This is an annoying paradox which can't be pushed aside by these scientists
because it is out there for all to observe.
The part of the Sun that we see is a highly fluidic blanket. The portion
around the equator could rotate faster if, and only if, a steady external
pull is exerted on this region of the Sun. Otherwise, internal friction
would eventually produce a uniform motion. This means that bodies in orbit
near the equator and close to the surface are generating a high
concentration of gravity-inducing radiations. "
Dr. Richard L. Thompson recently pointed out to me that such a different
flow could be due to internal factors. Current flows as exist on Venus
see Jan's book ) could be occuring. Just as atmospheric currents emanate
from the Southern Venusian orifice and get caught up in equatorial super
rotation, the same could be happening on the Sun and could account for the
faster rotation at the equator. I just wanted to set the record straight.
I still stand by Cater'ds concept of gravity as an electrostatic force, and
the role which electrostatic forces play in geological processes and the
auroral phenomena.
Dean
Vinaire,
Loved your site!
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/4890/index.html
Since you are a MIT man, I am interested in hearing your opinions about the
ether article and the one on gravity on the site:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/4890/index.html
Dean/Dharmapada
With relation to that Venus could band post, I wanted to send some more
Venus pics, but egroups doesn't seem to permit it. But the Venus pic I was
most interested in sending in on that web site whose address I sent two days
ago:
http://www.as.net/~takoonce/astro/our_solar_system.htm
Click on Venus, then when you get to the text page, click on Venus again,
and you get the pics.
Dean/Dharmapada
List Members,
I mentioned earlier that I had received a letter from Mr. Cater. Well, he
included his phone number, because I had asked, so I called him and had a
phone conversation. Open, friendly type of guy. He was happy to hear from
someone about the Hollow Earth Theory.
We spoke about several things, among them the Northern opening. He was quite
insistent that the magnetic pole, at Thule Greenland, is already on the lip
of the opening. I always think that one has to go way out there to find the
rim of the opening, in the middle of the Polar basin, but think about it-
when he was on the tip of Greenland, Greely was already reporting
foreshortening. That means that the tip of Greenland is already in the
downward sloping portion of the doughnut-like opening, end of story! Part of
the world we know is in the opening, or at least the beginning of it. After
all, the opening has a gradual sharpening of curvature, it isn't a sharp
drop.
This idea isn't contradictory with the experiences of Nansen- Nansen's ship
Fram just hit the opening from the other side.
And Amudsen's dirgible journey is compatible, too. Given the heavy curvature
which exists right there on the lip, I doubt that we can trust Amudsen's
affirmation that his starting point was the pole itself, from which he
traveled along 170* East. He could have traveled very much along the
curvature of the funnel without really knowing it. Rod has made that point,
that since Amudsen ended up off to the East of the Bering Strait, then he
must have dipped in along the way and lost his bearings because of the
inward-sloping curvature.
By the North of Greenland and Ellesmere Island, the inward sloping has
already started. The opening can extend a bit further towards Canada- we
don't have to cut it at 170* East exactly. And Nansen's location at 138*
East and 80* North puts us on the edge of the opening on the other side.
IMHO
Dean
We spoke about several things, among them the Northern opening. He was
quite
insistent that the magnetic pole, at Thule Greenland, is already on the
lip
of the opening.
By the way, the lip is no longer at Thule- it is near 100* West longitude.
Dean