Dean,
<Cater accounts for the voilet of high altitude skies, as well as the the blue, yellow, orange and red of the sky at different times, as being due to the process of redistribution of frequencies. It is due to the light passing through the atmopshere and having its frequency lowered rather than scattering. As Cater mentions, scattered where? If the dust particles are scatteing it, then the size of these particles only favors blue for some reason. Not!- Not! Not! Not!>
Yes, this made immediate sense to me. I want me college tuition back!
<If the particles are really undergoing a redistribution of frequency, then we have a cohesivem HE geo model. A COHESIVE model doesn't exist even for the established solid earth model, what to speak of a HE one. The particles of sunlight, upon striking the ground, would intereact as Cater outlines in chapter 13 with ether and the electrons of the atoms of the Earth's crust to produce particles of lower frequency, which quickly form soft particles and reach the gravity-inducing frequency. The lower frequency soft particles then penetrate the crust as Cater outlines in Chapter 12, i.e., a cannon ball versus bird shot. All along the way the more unstable soft particles break up and release their constituent frequencies, including visible light, and release the captured hard particles, which giv off heat and power geological functions such as volcanoes and earthquakes. >
This is what actually triggered my question. If hard partilces are the force behind "explosive & disruptive" earth changes, then I am thinking it is the soft partilces (stable) , in part, that cultivate the "paradise" environment of a HE, due to their low frequency. Also, if the hard particles break up as Cater says, then I doubt there would be much penetration of them into the HE, at least in multitudes,--which again puts attention back to the soft particles....., That is if all the "unstable soft partiles break up and release the captured hard particles" before entering into the HE? Which is probably the true question---yet, seems the most plausible with the distance needed to travel to reach a HE.
I think I am reading that the "most stable hard particles", those which do not break up, are the particles that create heat, earthquakes, volcanos, etc, and I imagine this is when they are traveling into the earth's crust, but never reach the HE, as they are busy, so to speak, doing there own "thing".
Pg 211--last paragraph--The soft electrons collected on a pyramid frame or closed pyramid soon reach a saturation point, and continuous bombardment causes the excess to drop down inside the pyramid. This coupled with the gravity repelling forces, results in a high concentration inside.---I am "unscientifically assuming" that it is the concentration of soft particles that is the power behind the pyramid, and no the pyramid itself, it is just shaped in a fashion where it is bombarded with sunshine, hence the high build up of soft particles. Also, Mr, Cater does refer that pyramids work better in the summer or in an area with a high rate of sunshine.
<The will pass through the inner shell further down, the more stable ones, and then congregate in the cante of the cavity, repelled by the gravity radiations beneath the inner crust from all sides. When the buildup gets to be too much and the flow of soft particles through the shell gets " pushed " from behind due to sunspot activity, then the flow of soft particles through the orifices of the shell picks up and the aurora display comes about.>
<It all starts with the process of redistribution of frequency.>
I think I understand these last 2 parts, at least I am able to form the picture in my mind.
Leslee
** Yahoo! Groups Sponsor**
` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]`
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the [Yahoo! Terms of Service](http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).
ยทยทยท
Date: Sunday, March 25, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Orgone in the sky