[allplanets-hollow] Nuke war on the surface

Please all who read this go to the Libertarian website at www.lp.org and read there thoughts on American Foreign policy.

Every one is always saying how terrorized we are as a nation and how the rest of the world wants to bring us to our knees. But what you all seem to forget is that the US asks for it. We play the global bully, and if a terrorist ever does strike at one of our cities it will probably be with one of our own weapons. We sell weapons to one side for a while then we change allegiances and sell to the other side a few years later.We promote dsichord and strife among struggling nations because it keeps us forever on top. America SHOULD NOT embroil itself in foreign wars. If people want to go and fight for a cause they see as just, as in Tibet, then they are free to send money or go fight. The government does not, however, have the right to force it's young men and women to go die for some political photo-op or misguided quest for a legacy. We have the strongest offence in the world and hence are offensive to the world, but as you said, we could not even stop one man with a suitcase form wreaking havoc. No natoin would hate us if we did not give them reason to do so.

-Eric
Resident Libertarian

···

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 20:13:03 EST

Frode,
There are many mind control and oppressive dictatorships still in existance
even as we speak. These wackos are still building up arms and attempting to
create nuclear weapons so they can bring the U.S.A. to its knees with
terroristic acts. It only takes a single lunatic to get through the defences
with a suitcase size nuclear bomb to destroy and entire metropolitan area.
Is Rome going to be destroyed by a nuclear attack from the sea like
Nostrodomus suggests? Is a terrorist group going to finally build or acquire
a black market nuclear device? If so, what then? They don't seem to value
life, or democracy, or civilization for that matter. They only have their
own agendas to wreak havoc on society or the western world and their
fanatical causes are the only thing that matters. Then there's China. They
have the bomb, the manpower, the attitude, and the need to expand. The Blue
Turbin Anti-Christ from the Arab nations and the Yellow Beast from the East
are prominant aspects of the turmoil yet predicted. Y2K is nothing compared
to the volumes of legitimate sources warning of this destructive era.
Again, though, along with these predictions are the accompanying predictions
that a certain selected group of people will be led to a place of safety
while this carnage is taking place to wait it out. Is it in Etidorhpa that
talks about forests of mushrooms in the interior which is there to feed the
refugees from the wars in their flight from the surface of the earth? If not
in Etidorhpa, then perhaps in the book The Underpeople and others.
I'd like to think that we, who are aware of the possible existance of such a
place of refuge, would be the ones inclined to be taking that flight if the
time ever comes in our lifetimes requiring that desparate escape.
Why would someone think that the information in Etidorhpa is so important
that it needs to be told at all costs?
Does the society that holds the secrets of its entrance location want to
reserve this escape route for themselves?
All I'm saying is that there are many possibilities, and the more knowledge
that we have about what makes up the structure of the earth can only help.
Let's keep searching, shall we?
Norlan

Good point Eric!

Frode

···

Please all who read this go to the Libertarian website at www.lp.org and read there thoughts on American Foreign policy.

Every one is always saying how terrorized we are as a nation and how the rest of the world wants to bring us to our knees. But what you all seem to forget is that the US asks for it. We play the global bully, and if a terrorist ever does strike at one of our cities it will probably be with one of our own weapons. We sell weapons to one side for a while then we change allegiances and sell to the other side a few years later.We promote dsichord and strife among struggling nations because it keeps us forever on top. America SHOULD NOT embroil itself in foreign wars. If people want to go and fight for a cause they see as just, as in Tibet, then they are free to send money or go fight. The government does not, however, have the right to force it's young men and women to go die for some political photo-op or misguided quest for a legacy. We have the strongest offence in the world and hence are offensive to the world, but as you said, we could not even stop one man with a suitcase form wreaking havoc. No natoin would hate us if we did not give them reason to do so.

-Eric
Resident Libertarian

The info below is from the book Forbidden Archaeology, by Cremo and
Thompson. I think that it just goes to show that we can't trust our concepts
about the age of human civilization.

A2.11 IRON CUP FROM OKLAHOMA COAL MINE

( CARBONIFEROUS )

On January 10, 1949, Robert Nordling sent a photograph of an iron cup to
Frank L. Marsh of Andrews University, in Berrien Springs, Michigan. Nordling
wrote: "I visited a friend's museum in southern Missouri. Among his curios,
he had the iron cup pictured on the enclosed snapshot" (Rusch 1971, p. 201).

At the private museum, the iron cup had been displayed along with the
following affidavit, made by Frank J. Kenwood in Sulphur Springs, Arkansas,
on November 27, 1948: " While I was working in the Municipal Electric Plant
in Thomas, Okla. in 1912, I came upon a solid chunk of coal which was too
large to use. I broke it with a sledge hammer. This iron pot fell from the
center, leaving the impression or mould of the pot in the piece of coal. Jim
Stall ( an employee of the company ) witnessed the breaking of the coal, and
saw the pot fall out. I traced the source of the coal, and found that it
came from the Wilburton, Oklahoma, Mines " ( Rusch 1971, p. 201 ). According
to Robert O. Fay of the Oklahoma Geological Survey, the Wilburton mine coal
is about 312 million years old. In 1966, Marsh sent the photo of the cup and
the correspondence relating to it to Wilbert H. Rusch, a professor of
biology at Concordia College, in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Marsh stated: "
Enclosed is the letter and snap sent me by Robert Nordling some 17 years
ago. When I got interested enough in this ` pot ' ( the size of which can be
gotten at somewhat by comparing it with the seat of the straight chair it is
resting on ) a year or two later I learned that this `friend' of Nordling's
had died and his little museum was scattered. Nordling knew nothing of the
whereabouts of the iron cup. It would challenge the most alert sleuth to see
if he could run it down .... If this cup is what it is sworn to be, it is
truly a most significant artifact " ( Rusch 1971, p. 201 ). It is an
unfortunate fact that evidence such as this iron cup tends to get lost as it
passes from hand to hand among people not fully aware of its significance.

···

To: Members

From: Dharma/Dean