[allplanets-hollow] Inner sun, no beam ?

[Scott_A_Macklin]

Dean,

        I don't mean to take away from your comments, but I wonder if
you aren't forgetting something with this idea that sun beam's aren't
seen
emitting form the polar holes. It seems to me that there must be a good
deal of clouds in the exit of internal air to the surface. Have you ever

exhaled in a cold enough climate? You see your own body heated gases
illuminated by the contrast in temperature. It is my recollection that
the
poles have some fog banks and low lying clouds that really have no right
to be there unless there is some type of physical manifestation causing
it.
If the hole is relatively narrow at is smallest diameter, then atmosphere

should permeate most of the hole. If Olaf Jensen is to be believed, the
internal Sun is not of the same type of nature as the external one 93
million
miles away. I suspect that a different expression of energy is involved
to
make it shine. He also speaks of the luminosity of this body. While
very
largely perceived, it is also very much dimmer than the outer Sun. If
you will
recall the external setting Sun, you will note that it can be known to
turn
practically a dull orange color when it is about to set. This is due to
the
great length of atmosphere that the light must traverse in reaching our
eyeballs.
Such an instance at dusk, is not a death sentence on our eyes and
measured
looks at the external Sun are safe only when it is seen through
sufficient atmosphere
to reduce its mighty glare that would blind one at high noon. Now this
distance
must be similar and I would think be far less than the distance that the
rays of
light from the inner sun must travel through in their attempt to permeate
the
outer polar opening. In addition, as I mentioned above, there is a lot
of moist
warm air meeting up with cold arctic air on the exterior. This is akin
to looking
at the dimmer view of the external Sun through moisture laden clouds.
So,
if we consider that the internal sun is only the luminosity of two full
moons,
whatever they mean by this, and as Olaf stated it as a reddish bronze
color,
the light begins a longer more atmospherically impaired journey to the
exterior several magnitudes dimmer to start with. Olaf was seeing the
internal
star at full blaze being directly overhead. It is my opinion that during
the summer
months where there is constant Solar light this light wouldn't be even
notable after
being diminished in all the ways that I have discussed. In the winter
time, there
could indeed be a very soft haze or glow caused by the internal sun, but
I see
no reason for the need to consider the soft particle action in this
regard. One must
remember that chances are, the opening is under some sort of monitoring.
Eye
witnesses would have to be close enough in the winter months with the
external
Sun being absent and allowing whatever inner sun light is left to take
precedence
enough to declare itself in darkened conditions whereby it finally has a
measure of
contrast to be observed.

Scott

···

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:37:05 -0300 "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]> writes:

List Members,

I think that the biggest hurdle that hollow Earther's face ( you all
) is
that they can't explain why the inner sun's beam are not seen
shining out
through the polar openings. You have to admit- it doesn't look good
if we
can't explain this.

Some writers have tried to explain this by saying that clouds must
clogg the
opening, which means that the opening must be narrow, or maybe even
crooked,
and which also means that the curvature anomalies shouldn't start
very far
out, which means that some of the good evidence which we DO have,
i.e.,
curvature anomalies, gets discarded and interpreted somehow. Clouds
are
going to hug the ground anyway because of gravity, so that would
have to be
SOME narrow opening- maybe a tunnel even.

Not!

Mr. Cater's hollow Earth model provides a congruent explanation.
Remember
that, according to Mr. Cater, the Sun's rays cause a disturbance to
the
ether flow through the planet when they strike the Earth's surface,
and then
react with the fundamental particles of matter ( electrons down
there in the
Earth's shell ) to produce soft particles which pass through the
Earth's
shell. They pass right on into the cavity and characterise the
atmosphere
there, to make a long story short. At the same time, the inner sun
is
comprised of soft particles which break up into their constituent
light
particles and release hard particles which give off heat. The light
from the
inner sun, however, isn't really seen to come out through the
opening. This
is the vexing part- If you can't explain this, people just think
that you
are a sentimentalist. This is especially so given the fact that the
inner
sun gives off light in the visual band.

But remember that the role of soft particles is that they reflect
light.
They flow out through the openings unseen because they are not light
in and
of themselves, they reflect it. So the soft particles, "
bottlenecking " at
the Polar openings, reflect light from the inner sun DOWNWARDS! The
soft
particles themselves flow outwards, but are mostly unseen unless
they break
up into light in the visual band. This happens during the auroras.
At that
time, the flow is sped up by sunspot activity which seeps through
the
Earth's shell at a faster rate and " pushes " the soft particles out
through
the polar orifices faster. This faster flow of soft particles causes
them to
break up further up in the atmosphere into the constituent photon
particles
of light which we see as the aurora. But there are always soft
particles
bottlenecking and flowing outward, and there is always light from
the inner
sun reflected downwards, back into the cavity.

Even so, let me pass on that favorite comment of mine: " H.D.
Northrop
further notes that the light of the aurora is continuous during the
Arctic
night ..." This either means that, when the aurora happens, it goes
on all
night, or that when one gets close enough, one sees some kind of
luminosity
way off over the horizon from the direction of the opening. This
would
suggest that not all of the light is reflected downwards, that when
one gets
close enough, some kind of luminous, hazy dome or oval area seen.

Soft particles explain why the inner sun's light is not seen.

To me, soft particles ar ethe heart of the Earth, its life force.
Learn more
about them in Cater's book:
http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm

Dharma/Dean

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

[0108]

Dean,

        I don't mean to take away from your comments, but I wonder if
you aren't forgetting something with this idea that sun beam's aren't
seen
emitting form the polar holes. It seems to me that there must be a good
deal of clouds in the exit of internal air to the surface.

Scott,

I don't deny this aspect, too- clouds have a role in blocking the light from
the inner sun, and the light of that sun must be dimmer than we might
imagine by the time it arrives at the opening, " atmospherically impaired,"
as you say.

But I imagine that the opening �s broad enough at the neck that the cloud
cover won't stretch all the way across, it will hug the contour of the
ground all the way up and down, within and without. The opening couldn't be
too narrow because Olaf got a lot of views of the inner sun, even while the
regular sun was in view, and didn't tell of seeing it through a narrow
tunnel. He talked of it rising in height above the horizon over an extended
period of time- a couple of weeks, at least- before they got in and found
land. This is my impression. So the opening shouldn't be so narrow such that
cloud cover is obscuring the exit of the sunbeams. Nansen even got views of
an over-the-horizon reflection of the sun, it seems, but he didn't report
any luminosity in the distance the whole time. So what is blocking? ( They
might have been keeping a lid on some of the things which they saw and
minimizing what they saw in their reports. This is another possibility )

Cater related that this Jim Bowen, who accompanied Byrd when he went back
after Operation Highjump, said that there was a continuous fog pouring out
of the opening. Bowen said that the luminosity was continous at that point,
although for the fog he couldn't he any sun. He was on the ground, but
still, I accept that fog and clouds are going to obscure. Even though the
fog and soft particles coming out are imbued with light, the clouds and fog
are still supressing the beams, especially when we consider that those beams
are weak and " atmospherically impaired."

I'm just saying that there is still open space across the width and I wonder
if soft particles, which are bottlenecking, don't reflect a good amount of
it downwards, back in.

Your point about the inner sun's rays being so dim due to passage through
so, so much atmosphere by the time it reaches the opening is a good one.
Really, the sun of the solar system never goes through that much atmosphere,
no way.

DD

Have you ever

···

exhaled in a cold enough climate? You see your own body heated gases
illuminated by the contrast in temperature. It is my recollection that
the
poles have some fog banks and low lying clouds that really have no right
to be there unless there is some type of physical manifestation causing
it.
If the hole is relatively narrow at is smallest diameter, then atmosphere

should permeate most of the hole. If Olaf Jensen is to be believed, the
internal Sun is not of the same type of nature as the external one 93
million
miles away. I suspect that a different expression of energy is involved
to
make it shine. He also speaks of the luminosity of this body. While
very
largely perceived, it is also very much dimmer than the outer Sun. If
you will
recall the external setting Sun, you will note that it can be known to
turn
practically a dull orange color when it is about to set. This is due to
the
great length of atmosphere that the light must traverse in reaching our
eyeballs.
Such an instance at dusk, is not a death sentence on our eyes and
measured
looks at the external Sun are safe only when it is seen through
sufficient atmosphere
to reduce its mighty glare that would blind one at high noon. Now this
distance
must be similar and I would think be far less than the distance that the
rays of
light from the inner sun must travel through in their attempt to permeate
the
outer polar opening. In addition, as I mentioned above, there is a lot
of moist
warm air meeting up with cold arctic air on the exterior. This is akin
to looking
at the dimmer view of the external Sun through moisture laden clouds.
So,
if we consider that the internal sun is only the luminosity of two full
moons,
whatever they mean by this, and as Olaf stated it as a reddish bronze
color,
the light begins a longer more atmospherically impaired journey to the
exterior several magnitudes dimmer to start with. Olaf was seeing the
internal
star at full blaze being directly overhead. It is my opinion that during
the summer
months where there is constant Solar light this light wouldn't be even
notable after
being diminished in all the ways that I have discussed. In the winter
time, there
could indeed be a very soft haze or glow caused by the internal sun, but
I see
no reason for the need to consider the soft particle action in this
regard. One must
remember that chances are, the opening is under some sort of monitoring.
Eye
witnesses would have to be close enough in the winter months with the
external
Sun being absent and allowing whatever inner sun light is left to take
precedence
enough to declare itself in darkened conditions whereby it finally has a
measure of
contrast to be observed.

Scott

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:37:05 -0300 "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]> > writes:
>
> List Members,
>
> I think that the biggest hurdle that hollow Earther's face ( you all
> ) is
> that they can't explain why the inner sun's beam are not seen
> shining out
> through the polar openings. You have to admit- it doesn't look good
> if we
> can't explain this.
>
> Some writers have tried to explain this by saying that clouds must
> clogg the
> opening, which means that the opening must be narrow, or maybe even
> crooked,
> and which also means that the curvature anomalies shouldn't start
> very far
> out, which means that some of the good evidence which we DO have,
> i.e.,
> curvature anomalies, gets discarded and interpreted somehow. Clouds
> are
> going to hug the ground anyway because of gravity, so that would
> have to be
> SOME narrow opening- maybe a tunnel even.
>
> Not!
>
> Mr. Cater's hollow Earth model provides a congruent explanation.
> Remember
> that, according to Mr. Cater, the Sun's rays cause a disturbance to
> the
> ether flow through the planet when they strike the Earth's surface,
> and then
> react with the fundamental particles of matter ( electrons down
> there in the
> Earth's shell ) to produce soft particles which pass through the
> Earth's
> shell. They pass right on into the cavity and characterise the
> atmosphere
> there, to make a long story short. At the same time, the inner sun
> is
> comprised of soft particles which break up into their constituent
> light
> particles and release hard particles which give off heat. The light
> from the
> inner sun, however, isn't really seen to come out through the
> opening. This
> is the vexing part- If you can't explain this, people just think
> that you
> are a sentimentalist. This is especially so given the fact that the
> inner
> sun gives off light in the visual band.
>
> But remember that the role of soft particles is that they reflect
> light.
> They flow out through the openings unseen because they are not light
> in and
> of themselves, they reflect it. So the soft particles, "
> bottlenecking " at
> the Polar openings, reflect light from the inner sun DOWNWARDS! The
> soft
> particles themselves flow outwards, but are mostly unseen unless
> they break
> up into light in the visual band. This happens during the auroras.
> At that
> time, the flow is sped up by sunspot activity which seeps through
> the
> Earth's shell at a faster rate and " pushes " the soft particles out
> through
> the polar orifices faster. This faster flow of soft particles causes
> them to
> break up further up in the atmosphere into the constituent photon
> particles
> of light which we see as the aurora. But there are always soft
> particles
> bottlenecking and flowing outward, and there is always light from
> the inner
> sun reflected downwards, back into the cavity.
>
> Even so, let me pass on that favorite comment of mine: " H.D.
> Northrop
> further notes that the light of the aurora is continuous during the
> Arctic
> night ..." This either means that, when the aurora happens, it goes
> on all
> night, or that when one gets close enough, one sees some kind of
> luminosity
> way off over the horizon from the direction of the opening. This
> would
> suggest that not all of the light is reflected downwards, that when
> one gets
> close enough, some kind of luminous, hazy dome or oval area seen.
>
> Soft particles explain why the inner sun's light is not seen.
>
> To me, soft particles ar ethe heart of the Earth, its life force.
> Learn more
> about them in Cater's book:
> http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm
>
> Dharma/Dean
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

[Hazel]

Attached an infra-red picture of cenral sun's rays escaping through polar
openings.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] More on " Inner sun, no beam ?"

> Dean,
>
> I don't mean to take away from your comments, but I wonder if
> you aren't forgetting something with this idea that sun beam's aren't
> seen
> emitting form the polar holes. It seems to me that there must be a good
> deal of clouds in the exit of internal air to the surface.

Scott,

I don't deny this aspect, too- clouds have a role in blocking the light

from

the inner sun, and the light of that sun must be dimmer than we might
imagine by the time it arrives at the opening, " atmospherically

impaired,"

as you say.

But I imagine that the opening �s broad enough at the neck that the cloud
cover won't stretch all the way across, it will hug the contour of the
ground all the way up and down, within and without. The opening couldn't

be

too narrow because Olaf got a lot of views of the inner sun, even while

the

regular sun was in view, and didn't tell of seeing it through a narrow
tunnel. He talked of it rising in height above the horizon over an

extended

period of time- a couple of weeks, at least- before they got in and found
land. This is my impression. So the opening shouldn't be so narrow such

that

cloud cover is obscuring the exit of the sunbeams. Nansen even got views

of

an over-the-horizon reflection of the sun, it seems, but he didn't report
any luminosity in the distance the whole time. So what is blocking? (

They

might have been keeping a lid on some of the things which they saw and
minimizing what they saw in their reports. This is another possibility )

Cater related that this Jim Bowen, who accompanied Byrd when he went back
after Operation Highjump, said that there was a continuous fog pouring out
of the opening. Bowen said that the luminosity was continous at that

point,

although for the fog he couldn't he any sun. He was on the ground, but
still, I accept that fog and clouds are going to obscure. Even though the
fog and soft particles coming out are imbued with light, the clouds and

fog

are still supressing the beams, especially when we consider that those

beams

are weak and " atmospherically impaired."

I'm just saying that there is still open space across the width and I

wonder

if soft particles, which are bottlenecking, don't reflect a good amount of
it downwards, back in.

Your point about the inner sun's rays being so dim due to passage through
so, so much atmosphere by the time it reaches the opening is a good one.
Really, the sun of the solar system never goes through that much

atmosphere,

no way.

DD

Have you ever
>
> exhaled in a cold enough climate? You see your own body heated gases
> illuminated by the contrast in temperature. It is my recollection that
> the
> poles have some fog banks and low lying clouds that really have no right
> to be there unless there is some type of physical manifestation causing
> it.
> If the hole is relatively narrow at is smallest diameter, then

atmosphere

>
> should permeate most of the hole. If Olaf Jensen is to be believed, the
> internal Sun is not of the same type of nature as the external one 93
> million
> miles away. I suspect that a different expression of energy is involved
> to
> make it shine. He also speaks of the luminosity of this body. While
> very
> largely perceived, it is also very much dimmer than the outer Sun. If
> you will
> recall the external setting Sun, you will note that it can be known to
> turn
> practically a dull orange color when it is about to set. This is due to
> the
> great length of atmosphere that the light must traverse in reaching our
> eyeballs.
> Such an instance at dusk, is not a death sentence on our eyes and
> measured
> looks at the external Sun are safe only when it is seen through
> sufficient atmosphere
> to reduce its mighty glare that would blind one at high noon. Now this
> distance
> must be similar and I would think be far less than the distance that the
> rays of
> light from the inner sun must travel through in their attempt to

permeate

> the
> outer polar opening. In addition, as I mentioned above, there is a lot
> of moist
> warm air meeting up with cold arctic air on the exterior. This is akin
> to looking
> at the dimmer view of the external Sun through moisture laden clouds.
> So,
> if we consider that the internal sun is only the luminosity of two full
> moons,
> whatever they mean by this, and as Olaf stated it as a reddish bronze
> color,
> the light begins a longer more atmospherically impaired journey to the
> exterior several magnitudes dimmer to start with. Olaf was seeing the
> internal
> star at full blaze being directly overhead. It is my opinion that

during

> the summer
> months where there is constant Solar light this light wouldn't be even
> notable after
> being diminished in all the ways that I have discussed. In the winter
> time, there
> could indeed be a very soft haze or glow caused by the internal sun, but
> I see
> no reason for the need to consider the soft particle action in this
> regard. One must
> remember that chances are, the opening is under some sort of monitoring.
> Eye
> witnesses would have to be close enough in the winter months with the
> external
> Sun being absent and allowing whatever inner sun light is left to take
> precedence
> enough to declare itself in darkened conditions whereby it finally has a
> measure of
> contrast to be observed.
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:37:05 -0300 "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]> > > writes:
> >
> > List Members,
> >
> > I think that the biggest hurdle that hollow Earther's face ( you all
> > ) is
> > that they can't explain why the inner sun's beam are not seen
> > shining out
> > through the polar openings. You have to admit- it doesn't look good
> > if we
> > can't explain this.
> >
> > Some writers have tried to explain this by saying that clouds must
> > clogg the
> > opening, which means that the opening must be narrow, or maybe even
> > crooked,
> > and which also means that the curvature anomalies shouldn't start
> > very far
> > out, which means that some of the good evidence which we DO have,
> > i.e.,
> > curvature anomalies, gets discarded and interpreted somehow. Clouds
> > are
> > going to hug the ground anyway because of gravity, so that would
> > have to be
> > SOME narrow opening- maybe a tunnel even.
> >
> > Not!
> >
> > Mr. Cater's hollow Earth model provides a congruent explanation.
> > Remember
> > that, according to Mr. Cater, the Sun's rays cause a disturbance to
> > the
> > ether flow through the planet when they strike the Earth's surface,
> > and then
> > react with the fundamental particles of matter ( electrons down
> > there in the
> > Earth's shell ) to produce soft particles which pass through the
> > Earth's
> > shell. They pass right on into the cavity and characterise the
> > atmosphere
> > there, to make a long story short. At the same time, the inner sun
> > is
> > comprised of soft particles which break up into their constituent
> > light
> > particles and release hard particles which give off heat. The light
> > from the
> > inner sun, however, isn't really seen to come out through the
> > opening. This
> > is the vexing part- If you can't explain this, people just think
> > that you
> > are a sentimentalist. This is especially so given the fact that the
> > inner
> > sun gives off light in the visual band.
> >
> > But remember that the role of soft particles is that they reflect
> > light.
> > They flow out through the openings unseen because they are not light
> > in and
> > of themselves, they reflect it. So the soft particles, "
> > bottlenecking " at
> > the Polar openings, reflect light from the inner sun DOWNWARDS! The
> > soft
> > particles themselves flow outwards, but are mostly unseen unless
> > they break
> > up into light in the visual band. This happens during the auroras.
> > At that
> > time, the flow is sped up by sunspot activity which seeps through
> > the
> > Earth's shell at a faster rate and " pushes " the soft particles out
> > through
> > the polar orifices faster. This faster flow of soft particles causes
> > them to
> > break up further up in the atmosphere into the constituent photon
> > particles
> > of light which we see as the aurora. But there are always soft
> > particles
> > bottlenecking and flowing outward, and there is always light from
> > the inner
> > sun reflected downwards, back into the cavity.
> >
> > Even so, let me pass on that favorite comment of mine: " H.D.
> > Northrop
> > further notes that the light of the aurora is continuous during the
> > Arctic
> > night ..." This either means that, when the aurora happens, it goes
> > on all
> > night, or that when one gets close enough, one sees some kind of
> > luminosity
> > way off over the horizon from the direction of the opening. This
> > would
> > suggest that not all of the light is reflected downwards, that when
> > one gets
> > close enough, some kind of luminous, hazy dome or oval area seen.
> >
> > Soft particles explain why the inner sun's light is not seen.
> >
> > To me, soft particles ar ethe heart of the Earth, its life force.
> > Learn more
> > about them in Cater's book:
> > http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm
> >
> > Dharma/Dean
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos
> >
> >
> >
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to

Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

>
>
>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

[0108]

Attached an infra-red picture of cenral sun's rays escaping through polar
openings.

Hazel,

My system wouldn't open it. Where did you get it? I'll go there myself and
find it.

DD

[Hazel]

Dean, It wasn't that spectacular, but I got it from a web-site, of a guy who
devotes his life to photographing the aurora and corona, from every angle,
at every time of the year, from every location it is visible. His hundreds
of photos are awesome. I'll try and find the link. Hazel.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:18 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Infra red pic

> Attached an infra-red picture of cenral sun's rays escaping through

polar

> openings.

Hazel,

My system wouldn't open it. Where did you get it? I'll go there myself and
find it.

DD

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

[Hazel]

Dean, This isn't the web-page with satellite images of aurora borealis, but
to any aurora fanciers out there, here are great pictures. In layman's
terms, I would say this is the cenral sun being charged with 'orgone'
(ether) by the outer sun! Hazel.

What are the Northern Lights (Aurora Borealis)? | Michigan Technological...

···

From: "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:18 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Infra red pic

> Attached an infra-red picture of cenral sun's rays escaping through

polar

> openings.

Hazel,

My system wouldn't open it. Where did you get it? I'll go there myself and
find it.

DD

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

[0108]

Dean, This isn't the web-page with satellite images of aurora borealis,

but

to any aurora fanciers out there, here are great pictures. In layman's
terms, I would say this is the cenral sun being charged with 'orgone'
(ether) by the outer sun! Hazel.

hazel,

please consider the possibility that the inner sun becomes charged through
the passage of transformed particles through the SHELL of the Earth, and
that what you see in the auroral display is a discharge through the opening.

# ; ^ )

DD

[Hazel]

Dean, I've grasped the soft particles through the crust bit and a disharge
from the polar cavity producing the auroral bands of colour is probably
correct. But the corona appears at midnight, in a circular halo, surely
THAT'S the central sun's rays. Dr. Reich said he first produced a 'negative
orgone' which formed a dark cloud above his lab and all plants and insects
within it's field sickened and died. He created a 'positive orgone' which
dispersed it. Just thought I'd mention it. Hazel.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:15 AM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Aurora is discharge from within

>
> Dean, This isn't the web-page with satellite images of aurora borealis,
but
> to any aurora fanciers out there, here are great pictures. In layman's
> terms, I would say this is the cenral sun being charged with 'orgone'
> (ether) by the outer sun! Hazel.

hazel,

please consider the possibility that the inner sun becomes charged through
the passage of transformed particles through the SHELL of the Earth, and
that what you see in the auroral display is a discharge through the

opening.

# ; ^ )

DD

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

[0108]

Ralph,

Nice info about the pyramids. They had those new chambers excavated for a
long time, a few years, before they went public with what was inside. The
whole process is so sanitized- why? Maybe we would learn something about
civilization's roots which would rock the boat, or maybe we would learn
about what's way underneath the pyramids. I suspect that there is a whole
cavern world down there- not a cavern, a cavern WORLD.

I mention some of the finding underneath in my pyramids article.

http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html

DD

[0108]

Dean, I've grasped the soft particles through the crust bit and a disharge
from the polar cavity producing the auroral bands of colour is probably
correct. But the corona appears at midnight, in a circular halo, surely
THAT'S the central sun's rays

Yes, of course! In that first post you made it sound as if the inner sun
were sucking in, charging itself, through the polar openings during the
aurora. Discharging the the holes is the opposite.

Of course, you are allowed to feel however you want- I don't want to be a
dictator, not much of one anyway!

But I think that we are on the same page now.

Later,

DD

Dr. Reich said he first produced a 'negative

···

orgone' which formed a dark cloud above his lab and all plants and insects
within it's field sickened and died. He created a 'positive orgone' which
dispersed it. Just thought I'd mention it. Hazel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean De Lucia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:15 AM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Aurora is discharge from within

[0108]

Scott said:

I will point out one more
thing you recently stated about the Sun. You stated that the
Newtonian laws of a falling body don't apply to the coronal gas
or plasma emissions on the sun. Does a lit match on the Earth
adhere to the laws Newton set forth for falling bodies? Of course
not! The sun is the same way. This isn't just room temperature
gases but highly heated flames and fires. A flame doesn't obey
the rules applied to falling bodies on the Earth. It is supplied
with an energy release that for the weight of the excited atoms
in the gases that make up the flame overcomes the laws of gravity.
Does not the chemical reaction from a rocket or jet defy the gravity
of the earth. Please examine and enhance your statements on this
topic because your argument doesn't hold water in my opinion.

Dean:

Scott,

If I am not mistaken, he took that part out from his new edition. I'll
double check, the book is not here.

But I've had other people call me on that one. There could be
electromagnetic forces at play, right? So I'll go along with you on this
one.

DD

[0108]

Scott questioned-

" My problem with Cater, though not having read his book, is
that he apparently feels justified in negating the gravitational force
of each atom within the Earth. Why does 50 miles mark the
ending point of gravitational radiation? Has all the mass below this
point become inert gravitationally? I would think not."

Dean said:

Scott,

Remember that Cater attributes the gravity effect to an electromagnetic
radiation with a certain frequency. According to his redistribution of
frequency law, the frequency becomes lower and lower the further it
penetrates. The radiation continues, but at a lower frequency, further down.
Once the radiation leaves that frequency, the gravity effects diminish and
gradually end.

The mass at no point becomes inert, and the gravitational force of the atoms
doesn't get negated, because the gravity effect is due to the charge on the
particles, in the ultimate issue. Keep track of the charge, not of the mass.
What you just said above was very Newtonian.

DD

[0108]

I think I changed some people to daily diget that I shouldn't have. If so, I
apologize.

DD