[allplanets-hollow] Infra red pic

DD,

What did you think of the NY Post article? This has been in the news lately
up here. I am just wondering who, what, where, when and how this "civilian
company, Raytheon," came about, more than anything. I wonder if they have a
website.

MM

Raytheon got their start making magnetrons for radar. Probably 50 years ago.

ยทยทยท

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Infra red pic

DD,

What did you think of the NY Post article? This has been in the news lately
up here. I am just wondering who, what, where, when and how this "civilian
company, Raytheon," came about, more than anything. I wonder if they have a
website.

MM

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.247 / Virus Database: 120 - Release Date: 4/6/2001

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.247 / Virus Database: 120 - Release Date: 4/6/2001

DD,

What did you think of the NY Post article? This has been in the news

lately

up here. I am just wondering who, what, where, when and how this "civilian
company, Raytheon," came about, more than anything. I wonder if they have

a

website.

MM

Mike Maloney,

Yes, I was aware of the rescue mission, I had heard something about it. But
what can you say? It could be a normal event; it is hard to read into it
without some additional info.

Raytheon is a defense contractor. They are in bed with all the military
secrets and such.

Dharma/Dean

Scott,

On page 138 of Pari Spolter's book, she has a section called " Free Fall."
She points out that Aristotle correlated velocity of a fall to weight, such
that a 100 pound weight would fall twice as fast as a 50 pound weight.

Then she cites a host of later thinkers, including Galileo, who show that
unequal weights fall at the same veocity, air resistance aside. Why isn't
that the end of the Newtonian ballgame right there? ( Newtonian = Gravity in
relation to the density of mass )

Also, she shows that the gravitational force of the Sun comes out constant
when calculated according to the equation she gives based on Kepler's Third
Law. Then she shows how the gravitational force of the Sun comes out " wrong
" when calculated with Newton's Gravity Formula. Why isn't that the last
nail in the coffin? What counter-srguments are given by Newtonians?

Dharma/Dean