Dean,
I'm not sure if you're asking me because you think I might know, or if you're
asking me this because you have a good idea and you're going to let me know
how extensive the hollow earth awareness is. I only know that whenever I
lecture on the subject to education classes there are very few individuals
who have even heard of the subject, let alone readily receptive to it. But I
suppose it all depends on what your definition of extensive is. I recently
had an intense discussion with a geology instructor. When we started to
delve into the HE Theory his attitude was that it was blasphemous to even
consider it. His frustration level grew when I was able to show fault with
each of his defences of the standard "model" of the latest of academia's
explanation of the interior of the earth. He was claiming that our current
knowledge of the techtonic plates disproved any hollow earth concept and
proved the molten mass interior floating crust idea. Needless to say, all of
these other "theories", which he was reluctant in having to admit, have very
little physical proof of their validity. With all of his defenses against
the concept, I was still very surprised in finding out that this is the first
he had ever heard of the HE Theory. I wish the knowledge of this idea of a
hollow earth were much more prominant throughout North America and Europe.
Norlan
Dean,
I'm not sure if you're asking me because you think I might know, or if
you're
asking me this because you have a good idea and you're going to let me
know
how extensive the hollow earth awareness is.
Norlan,
I've been in Brazil for six years, I really have no idea of the status of
the HET in North America. That is why I asked.
Jan has been doing some radio shows, but you know how people are, they keep
the radio going in the background, while they do this and that, and probably
don't take everything that they hear seriously.
I thought that the new agers might at least be informed, but I guess not.
There is a group called ISCE that has a web site, but they don't seem to be
active. Their message board has been dead.
Dean
Hi All,
I just got this from Jan Lamprecht, so I am forwarding it because it is
worthy.
Dharma/Dean
Here it is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Hi Everyone,
Lee sent me this. Now this is really weird. The problem: No Ice at
the North Pole. So some, like myself, immediately thought: No
problem - Global Warming. But check this article below. An
Australian scientist makes a (seemingly valid point), that Global
Warming cannot be the cause of melted ice at the North Pole.
OK, so what then? Now I'm just thinking... Firstly - is he right?
He makes a good point don't you think?
If he's right, then what's causing this? In my book I mentioned the
old problem of polyanas - huge stretches of melted ice in the polar
regions. No one really knows where they come from.
But some time back we discussed whether the El Nino is caused
by LAVA or HOT WATER pouring out of the Pacific sea bed - by
way of seismic activity...
In my book I had written about Commander Peary's observation
that a vast cloud of VOLCANIC ASH had fallen in Greenland in the
1890's. Peary believed there was an UNDISCOVERED VOLCANO
up in the Arctic seas north of Alaska.
Later, in 1923, Lt Cmdr Green said there was a volcanic island up
there, and he said it lay on a fault line.
Now let me tell you something interesting. I was chatting to a
seismologist about two weeks ago. I actually followed up on
Green's fault line theory. Now if you look at any seismic map of the
world you'll see lots of faults running along Asia and Alaska. Now
Green said there was a fault-line running from the Bering Strait
(Alaska), up to the North Pole, across it, and to Iceland. This was
in the 1920's. Green said that "Crocker Land" would be
SEISMICALLY ACTIVE... (just like Iceland is - and that it would fall
on the same fault line as Iceland)...
WHen I asked a seismologist for details of seismic activity in the
Arctic, he gave me a map which showed minor quakes
EVERYWHERE - EXCEPT for a huge BLANK SPACE in exactly
the area where Crocker Land should be. There was minor seismic
activity EVERYWHERE in the Arctic, Canada, Russia, etc - but
the area in question was a COMPLETE BLANK. Furthermore, the
fault line from Iceland went to the North Pole (as Green had said in
the 1920's), but from there it went into North Russia (instead of to
the Bering Strait where logic dictates it should go). Now I looked at
all my text books on seismology and there are no major fault lines
in north of Russia. The line from the North Pole to Russia doesn't
make sense. Could it be that the line from the North Pole to the
Bering strait lies in a CLASSIFIED zone?
Consider the mystery of the Polyanas... Why do large areas of ice
melt in the Arctic? Could it be that the real reason for Polyanas is
SEISMIC ACTIVITY which is occurring north of Alasak but which is
classified?
Green went so far as to say that Crocker Land would be ringed by
huge mountains (which he said he saw), which were caused by
this seismic activity. He said too that the island would be covered
in a permanent fog by the geysers and geothermal heat coming up
from the island.
Now think about this. Could this be the real explanation behind
Polyanas? Could this be the real reason why the ice has now
melted at the North Pole? Could it be that ABNORMAL seismic
activity is present in the Arctic and that is what is causing the ice
at the North Pole to melt?
Now I'm really curious...
Regards,
Jan