i myself am a prophet.. i have knowledge passed to me buy..humans from our future. the information has been 100 percent right so far... can you say that... they worked with my grand mother till she died.. now its me... see they can not mess with the history so it has to be some one from this time frame fearing a paradox in time.... so knowledge of future events have been passed down to me to try to intercede... to help the people in the future.... as there has already been a ripple in time... that will affect the future... when france detonated nukes in the ocean... deep down below in the deepest parts of the earth ocean.. where fissures run into canals witch run through ancient forests and desalinate the earths waters... then it moves through more canals in the earths crusts... and come up inland.. the earth scientists still have no knowledge of the affects and wont for about 50 more years... the water will surface in our wells and artesian springs world wide.. and will affect human DNA causing mutation and loss of human viability200 years from now the french leader who let this happen is known..in the future as the killer of millions jack cirac i am sure i spelled his name wrong but i am sure you know who i am talking about... the UFO,s a lot are from the future trying to restock human viability.. for a new beginning in the future.. while chatting with them and giving a DNA sample for them i could see the affects of the mutation they are undergoing... they are not aliens but our brothers and sisters... trying to save human kind... the reason their eyes are so big is because the earths ozone is depleted to dangerous levels and they have taken refuge in under ground cities the suns rays kills vegetation and blinds our relatives in the future they grow food in caves away from the harmful rays of the sun and live in under ground complexes..that's why they look pale in color lack of sunlight over the years has caused a change in the pigment of their skin their primary source of food is mushrooms that's a fact... si it would be a good idea to stock human dna from this time and keep it viable for the future.. that alone will help a lot about the radiation not much you can do for the next 10,000 years but our friends in the future will help take care of that.. so when you see a ufo and get probed its for a good cause to save mankind from our mistakes we made in this last 100 years
----Original Message Follows----
ยทยทยท
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Gravity and the Sun
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 20:03:27 EST
Dean,
Thanks for this reference. It does open up some interesting possibilities.
One of the major contradictions of Newtonian physics has to do with this very
topic. According to Newton's formulas the Sun has more gravitational pull on
the Moon than does the Earth. We all know this is preposterous or else the
Moon would be pulled away from the Earth toward the Sun in it's orbital path.
Newton's formulas also determine that the Sun not only has equal tidal
effect on the seas, but that it is supposed to have more effect on the tides
than does the Moon. Again, another preposterous result of the physics of
Newton's formulas. You would think that these obvious errors would create a
stir among physicists as obvious red flags as to the accuracy of Newtonian
physics. But no, these discrepancies are usually explained away as simple
glitches or misapplications of the formulaic math. However, some physicists
are starting to acknowledge these discrepancies, and they are starting to
question the validity of Newtonian Laws.
Yes, it is high time that these faults are exposed in a glaring fashion so
that the true nature of heavenly bodies and the forces that govern them can
be acknowledged.
Some feel confident that it is the fault of the dropped square sign of one of
Kepler's Laws of the Universe, which Newton omitted, is the basis of this
problem. What the correction of this formula does is reassign the strength
of the gravitational force to be much higher than that which the Newtonian
formula ascertains. This reassignment of gravitational force fits the
observed effects that we see in tidal relations to the Moon and the Sun. It
also corrects the incorrect conclusion that the Sun has more gravitational
pull on the Moon than does the Earth, and reverses that conclusion.
Why the establishment hangs on to such a faulty system as the Newtonian Laws
is the epitome of blind arrogance, and beyond my comprehension of what
sensible people would do is such cases.
I hope Cater's explanations have a sound logic to their premises and
conclusions in explaining these glaring problems with the revered Newtonian
mystique.
Norlan
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com