Russel,
You might not buy this but it is the contention
of some that the entire evolutionary scale of time is
way off the mark. I suggest for just one example the
Paluxy river footprint evidence in Texas. In the same
exact strata of fossilized river bed, they found what
appears to be the footprint of a Tyrannosaurus rex or
animal of similar type of lizard that leaves a very
distinct footprint and can be matched against the
fossil remains of supposed creatures that died out
millions of years ago, according to the evolutionary
model. Inside of these impressions, they found the
obvious footprint of a normal modern type human
being which proves easily at least according to the
shoddy standard that evolutionists use to claim
proof for their theories that in this case, man and
the dinosaur coexisted and in much more recent times.
Add to this the multiple examples of the coelacanth
that have been caught by fishermen in the past century
and cave drawings of an allosaurus and many others
depicting dragon like creatures. Then there are the
multiple accounts of plesiosaur aquatic dinosaurs
that reside in the oceans and some larger lakes and Lochs.
There have been many occurrences of teradactyl flying
dinosaurs that have been seen in several places. There
was even one account of a flying reptile that was just
enormously big that was found alive by two men in the
southwestern desert region of the United States.
I have no doubt that some dinosaurs have gone
extinct but that is no reason to suppose that it had to
have happened multiple millions of years ago. I recently
heard a discussion on satellite TV that described many
instances where dinosaurs were more common place than
you might imagine. What about the evidence of the original
clay figurines in South America that show dinosaurs and
humans dwelling together. It is true that some of these
were faked because the local people found out how valuable
they were to interested parties, but there was an ample
supply of original art work that stands as evidence of a
human dinosaur coexistence.
If you think about it a minute, it is unreasonable
in the extreme for ancient peoples to take the time and
effort to portray creatures they had never seen before and
that didn't exist. With hard primitive conditions, do you
really think that those people would take the time to be
archaeologists that dig up entire dinosaur fossils so that
they could fashion clay art forms that featured human
forms also? I find this a most ridiculous argument! The
normal cave paintings of identifiable animals such as
bison, horses, elephants and the like are not put into
question by the scientific community, yet if it shows
something that goes against the grain of what the scientific
community is trying to make the public believe then they
call the authenticity of such things into question. Despite
being supposedly trained in the scientific method, it is
sad that these scientists can be so swayed by their
personal bias even to the point of falsifying the facts.
So, respectfully, I would suggest that you take this
time line that the dinosaur and man never coexisted
together with a very large grain of salt. It is well
established by those that try to look into it that the
evolutionary crowd has resorted to falsification of
evidence just so that their perverse view of evolution
could be promoted.
I might as well put in one dash more. Even if things
evolved, and I don't believe it for one second, then that
means that spiritual forces that indwell both people and
animals had to have evolved as well and for this there
is absolutely no way the evolutionists can place a measuring
stick against the substance of spirit, nor can quantum
mechanics or any other scientific field do so either. To
believe that it all happened by chance is one of the most
absurd things I can imagine.
Scott
···
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 06:55:38 -0800 (PST) Russell Viers <[email protected]> writes:
--- Dean De Lucia <[email protected]>
Nice Drawings. The Unusual Creatures drawing on the
Etidorhpa auxiliary pics page clearly depicts a flying
reptile of some sort; I'd say a species of Pterosaur
or possibly a Cearadactyl. I cant identify however,
the other creatures, as they are too bizarre for
identification. The rest of the illustration shows
mammal-like-reptiles and giant insects that did exist
at the time when dinosaurs first walked the earth at
the beginning of the Triassic period 220 million years
ago.---Russ
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.