Hi, MM,
I've been here, checking in, just real busy for much response time. Got a
new computer and equipment, so I'll be sending in a scan of that 1980 or 1981
newspaper photo of the satellite shot of the aurora borealis -- the one that
shows the 1200 mile diameter arc which centers on the North pole. I also
have the cat scan info from the Discover magazine article which tells about
the MIT project that revealed the two continents on the inside surface of the
supposed molten lead inner liquid layer of our earth's supposed cosmogony.
I'll also include a synopsis of the lengthy phone conversation I had with the
Dean of the MIT Physics Department who was overseeing that project. He was a
bit surprised when I forecast to him some astonishing things they had
discovered in their followup readings taken two years later, before they had
even considered reporting these remarkable findings. All of this any HE
Theorist would have been able to preclude, but it struck him as either
psychic or covert in its origin. It should be an interesting tidbit for HET
proponents in the ever growing arsenal of support. I'll be back when time
allows. Thanks for the Hey.
Norlan
List members,
The excerpt below is from Chapter 15 of The Ultimate Reality by Joseph H.
Cater. I think that I ran it by you all a while ago, but I have a new point
to make.
A confidential aside first: I once wrote Patrick Moore, Britain's most
famous astronomer, about something on a web site, maybe it was his web site.
Anyway, his secretary wrote me back promptly. Feeling curoius, I wrote back
again and asked why the lunar craters always have the mountain peaks in the
center of the craters. From that point onwards, I received no response. At
the time, I didn't know about Cater's theory.
Anyway, here is what I want to say. Read the part below and catch his point.
Then think not only about other planets, but this one. Think about Ayer's
Rock in Austrailia; could it be that they swept the whole Austrailian
continent clean and wiped out a civilisation? Austrailia is an extremely
flat continent, you know. This could be explained by a lateral blast.
What about the American midwest? There are at lest a few landmarks which
correspond to the knob-like mountain which Cater refers to, such as Devil's
Tower in Wyoming, which was featured in the movie Close Encounters of a
Third Kind, and maybe Crater Lake in Oregon. Does anybody know if Crater
Lake has a mountain in the middle?
Until Later,
Dharma/Dean
Here is Cater:
THE ORIGIN OF MOON CRATERS
The concensus seems to be that moon craters are caused by the impact of
meteors. This is consistent with the quality of logic displayed in other
areas of orthodox cosmology. The diameter of most of these craters is
disproportionally great compared to their depth. A true impact crater has a
depth commensurate with its diameter. An impact great enough to produce a
crater with a diameter of some size on the moon would shatter the entire
moon, since it is hollow with a relatively thin shell. To wit:some craters
have a mountain in the center. It is significant that, in all cases in which
the crater has a mountain, the mountain is always in the center. How did it
ever escape destruction?
The only logical answer is that the craters were produced by particlebeam
weapons during the great interplanetary war. This, no doubt, was the one
mentioned earlier, when the planet Maldek was destroyed. Other planetary
bodies show similar craters, for instance, Mercury, Mars and the moons of
Jupiter.
A concentrated beam of high speed positive charges, preferably protons, can
have devastating effects, if directed against a specific target. The beam by
itself does relatively little damage. It is the after effects that are
destructive. While in motion, the positive charge effects of the particles
comprising the beam are minimal. After they strike the target, they lose
their velocity and a tremendous positive charge is concentrated at the point
of impact. This charge is maintained by incoming particles. A high
concentration of soft and hard electrons converges on the area from all
directions, creating a void in the regions originally occupied by these
particles. Others rush in to fill the void and a chain reaction, or domino
effect, is produced which affects the regions of space at ever increasing
distances around the target area. The number of electrons that converge on
the area is far out of proportion to the number of protons concentrated in
the area.
The ramifications are not difficult to imagine. The soft electrons
congregating there disintegrate and release the hard electrons they contain.
An inordinate concentration of hard electrons is the result, and is far more
than can be absorbed by the protons. First, an implosion and then
an explosion of electrons of colossal proportions are created. Most of the
energy of the explosion is directed outward, since it follows the lines of
least resistance. The number of particles involved and the amount of energy
released can far exceed that of any nuclear device. Since the energy is
directed outward, extremely wide but relatively shallow craters in a
planet's surface result. The principles involved in such destructive forces
are similar to those employed by Wilhelm Reich's cloudbuster, which will be
discussed later. The center of the craters produced would experience a
relatively small disturbance and, consequently, any mountain in the path of
the proton beam would be left standing.
Sports Fans,
I'm still working on Etidorhpa I might have some more up by Sunday night.
I wrote the John Uri Llyod museum to ask if they had the complete edition.
Something tells me that they won't.
Dharma/Dean