[allplanets-hollow]Chief

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Yahoo Group (Old Posts)
1

Dear Dharmapada,

Chief wants me to get him on the list which I will do I guess tomorrow. Im a little confused about which list started all this, and how to write to you personally, and which list to subscribe to for all this mail. I am so much behind in the reading too. but do some everyday. I went to bibliofind and ordered Lost by Byrd, pub. in thirties. Also am ordering Bernards book.

I just saw the video of Byrd's 1928-30 South Pole expedition and flight. Archival material, highly touted at the time by New York Times as one of ten best films of year. Made in 1930. Filmed by van de meer and another guy. I am further intrigued to dig deeper. Exciting to see Byrd at last, too.

your servant,
Jayaradhe

···

From: "dean" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Electrons
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:02:26 -0300

Re: [allplanets-hollow] ElectronsFrode Wrote:

   Hard particles are made up of photons from the highest end of the spectrum and soft particles are made up from photons from the whole spectrum except the highest part. The main difference is in how they are created. Soft particles are created through photon aggregates and hard particles through "intelligent design". Soft particles are also solid while hard particles are hollow.

   Dean Writes:

   Yes, another piece of the puzzle has fallen into place. Sometimes my mind gets overwhelmed.

    I had gotten really curious to know exactly how the hard electrons get stuck in the soft aggragates when I did some reading about the aurora and how disintegration takes place. It is such a cause for wonderment that the hard particle rises so high, unseen, and THEN gets released once it is 60 miles high to cause the auroral display. No wonder they thought the magnetoshpere was snagging particles from the solar winds ( they don't think that anymore ).

   I think that I finally figured out what is the cause of my " action at a distance " problem. The physics book which I bought did the trick. It seems that magnetic force exerts a centripedal force over electrostatic charges, which induces circular movement.

   This means to me that the Sun is exercising a much wider magnetic sphere than I ever imagined, that it encompasses the planets orbits, and that such a weak magnetosphere is enough to hold the planets in orbit because they have such little weight, being hollow, and gravity charges only existing in a thin area along the surface.

   Can you confirm this? Does the Sun have such a broad magnetic sphere? Is it this perpendicular impulse of the Sun's magnetosphere over electrostatic gravitational fields which maintains the planets in orbit?

   Dean

     On a different note, can I use that term " hard photon aggragates " ? Why does Cater uses the term " soft particles, " and defines them as aggragates of low frequency photons, but he does not define hard particles as a collection, as a grouping of aggragates. He always uses the term hard particles or hard electrons.

   See above.

   Frode

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [email protected]

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

2

Dear Dharmapada,

Chief wants me to get him on the list which I will do I guess tomorrow. Im

a

little confused about which list started all this, and how to write to you
personally, and which list to subscribe to for all this mail. I am so much
behind in the reading too. but do some everyday. I went to bibliofind and
ordered Lost by Byrd, pub. in thirties. Also am ordering Bernards book.

Judy,

If Chief wants on, just go to the site and click on updates, then follow the
instructions. Actually, the place to subscribe is here:
http://www.egroups.com/group/allplanets-hollow

I just saw the video of Byrd's 1928-30 South Pole expedition and flight.
Archival material, highly touted at the time by New York Times as one of

ten

best films of year. Made in 1930. Filmed by van de meer and another guy. I
am further intrigued to dig deeper. Exciting to see Byrd at last, too.

Anything that would suggest polar warming or such on the Byrd video?

I think it is good to get Bernard's book. It is a step you have to take,
because the thinking of Reed and Garner is reproduced in it. The book is
almost an excuse to showcase those guys again and keep their thinking alive.

Dean

3

By the way, I don't know if I ever ran this story by the folks on this
particular list, but is has to do with our theme of underground existences.
I think that the trolls and fairies of Celtic lore live in places like this.

http://www.sightings.com/ufo6/shastaeq.htm

Dean/Dharmapada

4

From " Hidden Neighbors," by Michael Mott:


dden-neighbors1.html

One of the universal, recurring motifs of visitors to the surface world from
faerie or fairyland is that of the fairy lover. One of the attributes of the
fairy lover has always been illusion, or glamour--illusion and confusion of
location, dilation or distortion of time, and most tellingly, illusion of
identity. Glamour, in it's original Celtic sense, was the name for the
seemingly transformative powers of disguise and illusion possessed and
exercised by fairy-folk both benign and malignant, beings of the air, the
seas, or the underearth. The willingness of the fairy lover to use this
power, selfishly and without compunction, is a worldwide constant in ancient
myth and folklore, as well as in modern UFOlogical and other paranormal
accounts. Equally as selfish is the fairy willingness to kidnap infants and
abduct fertile young people of both sexes, apparently for crossbreeding
purposes. In many accounts, the faeries of the British Isles and Scandinavia
would often be so bold as to tell their victims that this was the reason
they sought human children, promises of marriage, or repeated visits to the
terrified or enamored human being, for reproductive purposes and "fresh
blood" or genetic material among their own families or tribes.

A record of human relations with an unhuman race or species has been
available all along, but has been distorted by technologies or powers beyond
our understanding--providing only a hazy view as if seen through smoked
glass, or as if vaguely glimpsed, creeping up behind one in a warped and
illusory funhouse mirror. The enormous amount of first-hand narratives and
folk "traditions" have been dismissed all too often as primitive belief
systems, superstition, or foolishness. There is a difference between "fairy
traditions--" the first-hand, second-hand, or strangely-experienced
knowledge and encounters of a tribe or people--and "fairytales," or stories,
which mix "fairy traditions" with confabulation, fantasy, oral storytelling
(itself a blender of sorts), and morality tales. Upon close examination and
comparison, the "traditions" themselves seem to provide a cohesive and
revealing framework from which much information can be obtained--information
about the habits, appearances, customs, and so forth of non-human,
more-or-less hostile, subterranean races. Often this information would find
it's way into "fairytales," in order to lend an air of authenticity to the
story at hand. Soon the researcher realizes, however, that this wealth of
anecdotal evidence has influenced to some degree or other every folklore
tradition of the world, and continues to influence our plays, our
literature, our art and most other forms of expression. These things that so
confound and fascinate us have become some of our most-constant,
ever-present archetypes.

The British, Scottish, Welsh, and Irish subterraneans were believed to dwell
in a variety of locations which connected directly into a larger, nebulous
region, called by a variety of names: Tir Na N Og, Faerie, Fairyland,
Elf(Alf)land, and many, many others. To the Norse these regions were known
as Alfheim and Svartalfheim, and should not be confused by modern students
of folklore with a deeper, darker place of greater terrors, called
Nifleheim. Entrances to the regions inhabited by these beings could be found
in raths (ancient hill-forts), burial-mounds (barrows, sitheans, knowes,
brochs, duns, and so forth) and other ancient earth-works, caverns or clefts
in mountains and hills, and at the bottom of deep lakes or lochs. Some
confusion occurred, largely due to theorizing on the part of both victims
and collectors of folktales, that the fairy-folk were fallen angels, nature
spirits (elementals), or the hyperactive ghosts of the pagan dead. The
problem with these theories is that they are contradictory to the activities
described, and the purposes which obviously underlie these activities--that
is, the gathering of genetic material, ranging from human and animal to
plant samples, and the actual physical interbreeding which has been
described. It would seem that "spirits" of any description would have no use
for these things. This does not necessarily disqualify the existence or
involvement of factors which would be considered "paranormal" or "spiritual"
in nature; rather, it points out the consistent evidence that perhaps some
aspects of the phenomena described are due to an unknown and non-human
technological agency.