DD,
Good point. I have to re-read the article whence I return from work and
school this evening. I am guilty of a quick reading of the article, and
getting stuck on the "polar fountain" statement made, with a slant toward the
HE. I'll check it out later.
MM
MM,
Yeah, it's easy to oversimplify on that article, but I'm not sure to what
extent they, I say THEY meaning NASA, are moving the emphasis towards the
Earth as a source of the particles. I say this because I know that electrons
are involved as the source of the luminosity, but the article talks about
positively charged particles, the ions.
And look at what the article says here:
" RIMS also could not measure the lowest energy ions which would help
confirm that the source was the ionosphere and not the solar wind.
It turns out that all spacecraft develop an electrical charge. For high
altitude satellites, exposure to sunlight and the passage through plasmas
give a satellite a charge of about 5 to 10 eV. A small cloud of ions, a
plasma sheath, builds around the spacecraft and repels anything with lower
energy.
'We needed a device to neutralize that plasma sheath," Chappell said.
"Unless you can do that, you won't ever see those particles.'"
They seem to be saying that, for technical reasons, they can't perceive any
low frequency particles. How about that! It just so happens to be the low
frequency photon aggregates which carry and camouflage the visible electrons
out of the interior, to the point of auroral display.
I think that they can see whatever they want to see- they are just putting
up excuses so that they don't have to recognize the existence of the low
frequency particles.
Dharma/Dean
DD,
Good point. I have to re-read the article whence I return from work and
school this evening. I am guilty of a quick reading of the article, and
getting stuck on the "polar fountain" statement made, with a slant toward
the
HE. I'll check it out later.
MM
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
List Members,
I had a brief conversation with Mr. Cater last week, in which he related
something to me which I will pass on.
Once Mr. Cater interviewed a WWII aviator, the friend of a friend, who flew
the " hump " along Tibet to China. This avaiator had his craft chased by
Japanese fighters, and evaded them by hiding into clouds and flying
northwards. At one point, he flew out of the clouds and came face to face
with a huge mountain. He tried to gain altitude, but there was no way he
could fly over it. At his ceiling of 40,000 feet, this pilot could not see
the top of the mountain. I believe that he was rather close to it, but
still, that mountain was huge. Mr. Cater told me that he estimates that the
mountain was 3 miles higher than the 40,000 foot ceiling! Cater feels that
the mountain makes Everest look like foothills in comparison.
I asked him how it could be that no one knows about this mountain, and he
said that the powers-that-be don't want to divulge this info because it
would ruin a few pet theories in physics.
Take it or leave it.
Mr. Cater is in Portland, Oregon. Do we have anyone on the list around
there? Maybe we could get someone to visit him and tape an interview. He is
quite elderly and we might want to gather together his experience- he said
that he had info that he hadn't published.
I'm out of here till Monday, I am traveling.
Dharmapada / Dean
List Members,
I just got a new article up on VNN. Would you all do the favor of clicking
on it, scrolling to the bottom, and rating it?
Thanks
Dharma/Dean
List Members,
I just got back from a trip to a place here in Brazil called Falls of
Iguazu. It is one of the biggest water falls in the world. It has 2.7
kilometers of lateral extension, and is as much as 84 meters high.
The sheer force and power of the cascading water forms a super-fine mist
which corresponds to Cater's description below. Mr. Cater is going to
explain that the water particles formed by this forceful agitation are
imbued with a negative charge, and that the rising of the fine mist is due
to repulsion in relation to the Earth's gravitational field.
This is because water naturally has a positive charge and lots of space
between the molecules, and because low-frequency photon particles have a
negative charge. Thus, the negative-charge particles lodge themselves
between the water molecules. They bust out upon receiving such a strong jolt
from the fall and these negative-charge particles carry the fine water
particle with it.
This mist was incredible- miles in diameter, it rose hundreds of yards above
the falls and just kept going. We could see it from the air. We could see
the effect of some horizontal breeze, but the mist definitely rose
vertically without any effect from the horizontal breeze.
From page 171 of The Awesome Life force:
" A paradox seems to exist with regards to clouds. They consist of small
water droplets that do not fall. From the standpoint of the properties of
water just presented, they should fall. Every water droplet is attached to a
dust particle. This dust particle absorbs a high concentration of negative
charges from the water. The particle would levitate upward, were it were not
for the water droplet holding it down. If the amount of water around this
dust particle exceeds the critical amount, the droplet will fall as rain.
Outer space is permeated with fine dust that continually replaces the dust
taken out of the atmosphere by precipitation. Ths dust is vital to
sustaining life on a planet. Without it, there would be little or no
precipitation.
Under certain conditions, water can lose weight and even levitate.
Ex-periments have shown that water, when ejected in the form of fine jets,
will start to levitate after falling a certain distance. Also, THE FINE
SPRAY RESULTING FROM WATERFALLS OFTEN HAS THE TENDENCY TO LEVITATE UPWARDS.
This phenomenon has puzzled many observers. By now, the reason is obvious.
[ for a reader of his book ] Such conditions cause the water droplets to be
impregnated with an inordinate concentration of soft electrons [ of a
negative charge ]." ( Page 171 of The Awesome Life Force )
Janice,
While we were at the falls, I was able to finish reading that book by Erich
Von Daniken " Gold of the Gods." Very interesting. He gave some nice
information about inner Earth tunnels, like the ones under Peru. I am going
to have to get his original book Chariots of the Gods.
Did you ever check out his web site?
Anything there?
I'll have a post from that book ready by Monday or Tuesday.
Dean