Congratulations. Others are starting to discover that there is a much bigger
picture to the "play stupid" attitude of our "see, hear. and speak no evil"
government.
The lengths and expense that our government is willing to spend on
fabricating lies and false explanations of UFO phenomena is startlingly
obvious. No one goes to these great lengths or is willing to look so
absolutely foolish if it isn't for a very intentional reason. Conceal the
truth at all costs. Which raises the question, "What is so important and so
critical that it requires this kind of top priority mis-information campaign?"
This is only the tip of the iceberg. Peary's notes and diary do reveal the
rather amazing anomoly of the polar opening. As Peary made his all out push
to reach the North Pole, his sextant readings indicated his distance of
travel. This is based on the relationships of the stars to that of the
earth. The bearings are based on what is expected to be this relationship
compared to the curvature of the circumference of the earth. But when Peary
was taking and recording his readings he was nearing the pole and
circumventing the lip of the opening. This greatly increased his angles and
thus the calculations of his distance. The main reason Peary's account and
honesty has been suspect, is because of the distances he claimed to have
traveled in the last few days of his polar push. What Peary claimed, was
that whereas he had been struggling to gain only a few miles each day in this
push for the poles, however, his readings on the last day before reaching the
supposed pole, indicated that he traveled nearly 400 miles the last days of
his drive! There are several other instances of altered or tampered with
accounts of polar encounters. There has been a massive organized effort to
eliminate or alter these references. But why? What are we hiding? What is
so worth such an extensive effort? There's much more to all this than meets
the eye. Later.
Norlan
Norlan,
Nice points.
Jan Lamprecht fels that Peary's fast progress at the end of his drive was
principally due to the fact that the ice in the region of the pole becomes
smooth, although the ice around that region is simply jagged.
But I ask, whay does the ice become smooth? Why I used to live, the snow
would smooth out when the temperatures rose- otherwise, the snow and ice
would remain in pointd, jagged drifts. The fact that the ice smoothed out
suggests, in and of itself, that Peary was approaching the opening and the
warmer air that the opening would bring with it.
It naturally follows that proximity to the opening means that Peary's
calculations of distance traveled were influenced by a flattening of the
curvature. Hence, 400 miles was covered rather quickly. Nansen also
experienced similar curvature anomalies, approaching from the other side.
When Jan refutes that curvature anomalies were involved in the distances
covered by Peary, he doesn't seem to be taking into account the
foreshortening of the horizon reported by Lt. Greely, from the same region,
even further away. If there was foreshortening/curvature flattening reported
from further away, then why not from closer to the Pole, from where Peary
was? Greely's foreshortening was reported from around 80* near Ellesmere
Island, and Nansen had his many confusing encounters with the same, starting
from about 80* on the other side, above Siberia, at around 138* East
Longitude. So from 80* degrees latitude, going all around, heading
polewards, there is already an inward slope.
Therefore, Peary's speeds are embarassing to anyone trying to hide the
truth, and he was criticised until he took a few statements back, especially
about the land mass which he reported.
I think it is hard to look at the hollow Earth picture and not include the
conspiracy angle, although a few people are going to think that that is
oversimplistic and such.
Dharmapada/Dean
Congratulations. Others are starting to discover that there is a much
bigger
picture to the "play stupid" attitude of our "see, hear. and speak no
evil"
government.
The lengths and expense that our government is willing to spend on
fabricating lies and false explanations of UFO phenomena is startlingly
obvious. No one goes to these great lengths or is willing to look so
absolutely foolish if it isn't for a very intentional reason. Conceal the
truth at all costs. Which raises the question, "What is so important and
so
critical that it requires this kind of top priority mis-information
campaign?"
This is only the tip of the iceberg. Peary's notes and diary do reveal
the
rather amazing anomoly of the polar opening. As Peary made his all out
push
to reach the North Pole, his sextant readings indicated his distance of
travel. This is based on the relationships of the stars to that of the
earth. The bearings are based on what is expected to be this relationship
compared to the curvature of the circumference of the earth. But when
Peary
was taking and recording his readings he was nearing the pole and
circumventing the lip of the opening. This greatly increased his angles
and
thus the calculations of his distance. The main reason Peary's account
and
honesty has been suspect, is because of the distances he claimed to have
traveled in the last few days of his polar push. What Peary claimed, was
that whereas he had been struggling to gain only a few miles each day in
this
push for the poles, however, his readings on the last day before reaching
the
supposed pole, indicated that he traveled nearly 400 miles the last days
of
his drive! There are several other instances of altered or tampered with
accounts of polar encounters. There has been a massive organized effort
to
eliminate or alter these references. But why? What are we hiding? What
is
so worth such an extensive effort? There's much more to all this than
meets
ยทยทยท
the eye. Later.
NorlanTo unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]