Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Gary, that video was just awful. Many photos used aren't realistic, or
have been debunked. She didn't present facts, there were no source
references at all. This sort of thing doesn't help hollow earth
researchers and the furthering of truth, it just becomes something the
majority of people can laugh at.
Serious research of Hollow Earth doesn't make progress when such a poor
job is done.
···
On 7/3/2012 6:50 AM, Gary Fleck wrote:
Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sorry Kathy, I'll try to do better in the future, although I thought group members were able to discern that for themselves, but, thanks for pointing that out for those who aren't aware. Very little info is going to be unaffected by misunderstandings, I usually mention that in my posts. Sorry. Gary
···
--- In [email protected], Kathy <getnews1@...> wrote:
Gary, that video was just awful. Many photos used aren't realistic, or
have been debunked. She didn't present facts, there were no source
references at all. This sort of thing doesn't help hollow earth
researchers and the furthering of truth, it just becomes something the
majority of people can laugh at.
Serious research of Hollow Earth doesn't make progress when such a poor
job is done.On 7/3/2012 6:50 AM, Gary Fleck wrote:
>
>
>
> Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Kathy,
You do have reason and right on your side. However, I'll say two things.
One is that whenever we post half and half material, the ideas of "for what it's worth" and also "take it with a grain of salt" are implicit. Ridiculous material should never get posted because it is repulsive to many list members and induces people to leave the list.
Another things is, though, that if we are going to post such material because there is also some good information mixed in, I think that the person who posts it has the responsibility to the list to offer some sort of caveat or point out some of the weak points and flaws of the material posted. Otherwise, it gives the impression that the person who posted thinks that the material is the real Mc Coy.
In this way, I think that your comments will help us to improve the quality of our presentation. We should start investing a few minutes to explain our posts if there are any drawbacks.
Dean
···
From: Kathy
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 9:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
Gary, that video was just awful. Many photos used aren't realistic, or
have been debunked. She didn't present facts, there were no source
references at all. This sort of thing doesn't help hollow earth
researchers and the furthering of truth, it just becomes something the
majority of people can laugh at.
Serious research of Hollow Earth doesn't make progress when such a poor
job is done.
On 7/3/2012 6:50 AM, Gary Fleck wrote:
Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I agree Dean, Kathy, and, I usually do that, when I post anything that isn't verifiable... unfortunately I didn't do that this time. Sorry folks... But, there is very little that is about the hollow Earth that is 100% verifiable, and if that was all that was posted here there probably wouldn't be much posted. One must always sift the wheat from the chaff... Gary
···
--- In [email protected], "silopanna" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Kathy,
You do have reason and right on your side. However, I'll say two things.
One is that whenever we post half and half material, the ideas of "for what it's worth" and also "take it with a grain of salt" are implicit. Ridiculous material should never get posted because it is repulsive to many list members and induces people to leave the list.
Another things is, though, that if we are going to post such material because there is also some good information mixed in, I think that the person who posts it has the responsibility to the list to offer some sort of caveat or point out some of the weak points and flaws of the material posted. Otherwise, it gives the impression that the person who posted thinks that the material is the real Mc Coy.
In this way, I think that your comments will help us to improve the quality of our presentation. We should start investing a few minutes to explain our posts if there are any drawbacks.
Dean
From: Kathy
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 9:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"Gary, that video was just awful. Many photos used aren't realistic, or
have been debunked. She didn't present facts, there were no source
references at all. This sort of thing doesn't help hollow earth
researchers and the furthering of truth, it just becomes something the
majority of people can laugh at.
Serious research of Hollow Earth doesn't make progress when such a poor
job is done.On 7/3/2012 6:50 AM, Gary Fleck wrote:
>
>
>
> Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Agreed.
···
On Jul 6, 2012 3:01 AM, "Kathy" <[email protected]> wrote:
**
Gary, that video was just awful. Many photos used aren't realistic, or
have been debunked. She didn't present facts, there were no source
references at all. This sort of thing doesn't help hollow earth
researchers and the furthering of truth, it just becomes something the
majority of people can laugh at.
Serious research of Hollow Earth doesn't make progress when such a poor
job is done.On 7/3/2012 6:50 AM, Gary Fleck wrote:
>
>
>
> Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Gary,
For me it is understood and natural that you post something "for what it's worth", and that each individual has to decide for themselves. I didn't mean to point you out. I myself am one to just throw something out there.
But it just dawned on me that there is a lot of truth in what Kathy is saying, it almost becomes an approval when I post something and just leave it out there with no qualifiers. So I, personally, am going to start qualifying what I post, according to "what I'm worth".
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], "Gary" <g.fleck@...> wrote:
I agree Dean, Kathy, and, I usually do that, when I post anything that isn't verifiable... unfortunately I didn't do that this time. Sorry folks... But, there is very little that is about the hollow Earth that is 100% verifiable, and if that was all that was posted here there probably wouldn't be much posted. One must always sift the wheat from the chaff... Gary
--- In [email protected], "silopanna" <silopanna@> wrote:
>
> Kathy,
>
> You do have reason and right on your side. However, I'll say two things.
>
> One is that whenever we post half and half material, the ideas of "for what it's worth" and also "take it with a grain of salt" are implicit. Ridiculous material should never get posted because it is repulsive to many list members and induces people to leave the list.
>
> Another things is, though, that if we are going to post such material because there is also some good information mixed in, I think that the person who posts it has the responsibility to the list to offer some sort of caveat or point out some of the weak points and flaws of the material posted. Otherwise, it gives the impression that the person who posted thinks that the material is the real Mc Coy.
>
> In this way, I think that your comments will help us to improve the quality of our presentation. We should start investing a few minutes to explain our posts if there are any drawbacks.
>
> Dean
>
>
>
>
> From: Kathy
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 9:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
>
>
>
> Gary, that video was just awful. Many photos used aren't realistic, or
> have been debunked. She didn't present facts, there were no source
> references at all. This sort of thing doesn't help hollow earth
> researchers and the furthering of truth, it just becomes something the
> majority of people can laugh at.
> Serious research of Hollow Earth doesn't make progress when such a poor
> job is done.
>
> On 7/3/2012 6:50 AM, Gary Fleck wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
> > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu>
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
This morning I decided to share again information given a few years ago.
Some of you may remember a gentleman from the European continent who was a sea captain, his career was navigation of cargo ships and he once told me he'd been to every continent on this earth (not sure about Antarctica).
His efforts to find satellite images are in his thread on UFO Casebook... his thread is here: http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=towers&action=display&num=1184284510
I've some posts there too.
His real name was Damir, and he's not responded to my emails for a couple of years, nor has he continued to post, so I fear we've lost him. He is the DAPACAP who posted the YouTube video of the Japanese weather satellite AMSR-E. I believe he was the first to find it. He used the id of 'africa' on UFO Casebook.
My hat goes off to the research he was doing! Excellent work.
Kathy
Thanks Dean, I try to post info I feel will be of interest and value to the group, folks who have been on the group for any length of time know that, occasionally I post something without a qualifier, but, those who know me, know I am not trying to deceive anyone in doing so. (I hope) Gary
···
--- In [email protected], "Dean D" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Gary,
For me it is understood and natural that you post something "for what it's worth", and that each individual has to decide for themselves. I didn't mean to point you out. I myself am one to just throw something out there.
But it just dawned on me that there is a lot of truth in what Kathy is saying, it almost becomes an approval when I post something and just leave it out there with no qualifiers. So I, personally, am going to start qualifying what I post, according to "what I'm worth".
Dean
--- In [email protected], "Gary" <g.fleck@> wrote:
>
> I agree Dean, Kathy, and, I usually do that, when I post anything that isn't verifiable... unfortunately I didn't do that this time. Sorry folks... But, there is very little that is about the hollow Earth that is 100% verifiable, and if that was all that was posted here there probably wouldn't be much posted. One must always sift the wheat from the chaff... Gary
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "silopanna" <silopanna@> wrote:
> >
> > Kathy,
> >
> > You do have reason and right on your side. However, I'll say two things.
> >
> > One is that whenever we post half and half material, the ideas of "for what it's worth" and also "take it with a grain of salt" are implicit. Ridiculous material should never get posted because it is repulsive to many list members and induces people to leave the list.
> >
> > Another things is, though, that if we are going to post such material because there is also some good information mixed in, I think that the person who posts it has the responsibility to the list to offer some sort of caveat or point out some of the weak points and flaws of the material posted. Otherwise, it gives the impression that the person who posted thinks that the material is the real Mc Coy.
> >
> > In this way, I think that your comments will help us to improve the quality of our presentation. We should start investing a few minutes to explain our posts if there are any drawbacks.
> >
> > Dean
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Kathy
> > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 9:56 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
> >
> >
> >
> > Gary, that video was just awful. Many photos used aren't realistic, or
> > have been debunked. She didn't present facts, there were no source
> > references at all. This sort of thing doesn't help hollow earth
> > researchers and the furthering of truth, it just becomes something the
> > majority of people can laugh at.
> > Serious research of Hollow Earth doesn't make progress when such a poor
> > job is done.
> >
> > On 7/3/2012 6:50 AM, Gary Fleck wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Agharta and the theory of the "Hollow Earth"
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu
> > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0vFVyTaA5A&feature=relmfu>
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>