Adamski & Venusians on UFO Propulsion & Antigravity

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Physics (Hollow Planets)
1

People,

I found several comments in the book Inside Spaceships, by George
Adamski, to suggest that gravity effects, as well as UFO propulsion
systems, are connected to electrogravitics:

"The ship itself," Firkon explained, "is utilizing the power of
nature—'electromagnetic,' I think you call it— and has excess power
at all times. Some of this excess is dissipated through its skin out
into space for a certain distance, sometimes only a short way,
although at times its influence can extend for several miles outward.
This acts as a shield against any particles, or `space debris,' as
you on Earth term it, repelling such things by this constantly
radiating force."

He went on to explain that all bodies in space are negative to space
and are actually moving in a sea of electromagnetic force. Therefore,
a negative radiation repels all negative bodies while at the same
time it prevents the ship from heating through friction.

…

People,

This is interesting to the Hollow Earth Theory because, were gravity effects caused by mass instead of electromagnetic attractions and repulsiions, the superior weight of the Earth´s crust would make the shell of a hollow planet fall in upon itself.

Thus, we have a positive alternative which is compatible with the Hollow Earth Theory.

Dean

1 Like
2

People,

UFO contactee George Adamski related the following information about the cloud canopy on Venus and the one that the Earth used to have:

" This ended the showing and I was invited to ask questions. First, I asked what effect, if any, the constant cloudy condition over Venus has on its peoples.

Orthon replied, “In addition to living according to universal laws, our atmosphere is a contributing factor toward an average life span of one thousand years. When the Earth, too, had such an atmosphere, man’s years on your planet were correspondingly far greater than now.

“The cloudy formation surrounding our planet acts as a filter system to weaken the destructive rays which otherwise would enter its atmosphere. I call your attention to a record contained within your own Holy Writ. If you study it carefully, you will notice that the span of life on Earth began to decrease when the cloudy formation lessened and men there for the first time saw the stars out in space."

Posted by Dean

3

Perspectives on the cloud canopy? Well, there is an interesing commment in Mike Mott´s book, Caverns, Cauldrons and concealed creatures, on page 19:

“In his highly-confabulated accounts of subterranean dwellers and their predations upon the surface world, the pulp writer Richard Shaver insisted that such beings had taken refuge beneath the Earth´s surface as a result in a change in the Sun, or in its effect upon the genetic structure of living tissue. We know now that prolonged exposure to direct sunlight and other types of direct radiation do in fact degrade our cells, and in fact may be the primary cause of aging. The Sumerian and Hebrew accounts of a flood seem to indicate that the atmosphere surrounding the Earth was once very different than at present, with an ever present “canopy” or “firmament” which may have kept the majority of such radiation away from life on the planet. In fact, the book of Genesis indicates that the “first rainbow” occurred after the downpour of the deluge (perhaps when the cloud canopy fell, due to some form of catastrophism), when the Sun shone brightly upon the Earth. If this occurred upon a day which was, in actuality, the first day in millions of years without a hazy shroud of water vapor or even suspended ice crystals filling the upper atmosphere, then this may not be as much of a myth as many might wish to believe”.

How ´bout that?

Dean

4

So if there are actually beings within the Hollow Earth then there must be some kind of light that mimics the Sun. All Mammals need sunlight to reproduce. Humans need the Sun for Vit. D, as a regulator of mental heath and sleep cycles among other things. It's true fo course that excessive and direct sun is damaging to all Humans .

All of us in love with the Hollow Earth mythos know of different acccounts of what lies below. From Shavers dark tales of a dim horror of a world filled with monsters(Deros) to other accounts of magnificent beings, flora and fauna more grand than the surface world. Therefore, how do they survive without an ad hoc Sun if one is skeptical of an "inner sun"

What if they thrive because of advanced technology. We're all familiar with the claims of the Germans moving to the underworld below the Antarctic at the end of WWll. However, them using 1940's tech, escaping a war and building under a frozen world seems unlikely. We do know that many of the Elites seem to be fascinated by what lies below Antarctica as of late.

What if the Germans enteredsome of those notable caves and ala "The Forbidden Planet" discovered and used left over tech from the "Krell" as in the film which would solve any number of problems living underground. Including farming, energy sources and of course the need for Sunlight. There are rumors of evidence of an advanced civilization that lies below the ice under Antarctica.

5

Keith,

I would like to expose you to the theme of Joseph H. Cater that the Sun's particles that pass through the Earth's shell disintegrate due to friction with the frequencies of electricity in the different stratas below. And that such particles are ultimately composed of photons which disperse and illuminate the cavern worlds below.

There are many civilisations described in the different stratas of the Earth's shell, and they can't all depend on artificial sources of power generation and light.

Dean

6

From Adamski's book Inside Spaceships-

http://www.cosmic-people.com/adamsk_e.htm

Who knows whether it is genuine? I'll volunteer this, though- I
found some comments about the propulsion system of the flying saucers
that impressed me. The comments point out that the propulsion system
is electromagnetic, which implies that repulsion is created in
relation to the Earth's gravity. This explains why flying saucers
float, and stipulates that they move without experiencing resistence
from gravity. ( Which is different from the way I have to drag
myself up and down the stairs all the time! )

" The Martian, noting my change of interest, explained, "Three of
those cables carry power from the magnetic pole to the three balls
under the ship which, as you have seen, are sometimes used as landing-
gear. These balls are hollow and, although they can be lowered for
emergency landing and retracted when in flight, their most important
purpose is as condensers for the static electricity sent to them from
the magnetic pole. This power is present everywhere in the Universe.
One of its natural but concentrated manifestations is seen displayed
as lightning."

Dean

7

George Adamski gave a complete explanation for the habitability on the
more distant planets, and the following is taken from his book, Flying Saucers
Farewell.

" One
of the most frequent problems encountered when giving a lecture on space is the
insistence of scientists that the outer planets are devoid of light and heat.
Their objection is that radiation from the sun is so weak at these vast
distances that Pluto, for instance, would be at absolute zero or close to it,
with a frozen atmosphere, and totally incapable of supporting life‑forms of any
type.

This is the
main argument brought against me when doubt is expressed about my meeting human
beings from some of these other planets.

The first
thing to realize is that the sun does not emit light and heat in the form we
observe here on Earth. Radiation from the sun does not manifest itself as light
and heat until it penetrates the atmospheres of the planets themselves. Outer
space is devoid of light as we know it. The light in outer space is a cold
light caused by the phosphorescence of vast clouds of particles and gases
responding to the radiation given off by the sun. To a human observer, outer
space looks like a dark, vast void, filled with billions upon billions of tiny
specks of multicolored light. All of these tiny lights are in a state of
continuous motion and activity.

Radiation
from the sun is composed of ultra­violet waves, hard and soft X‑rays, cosmic
and gamma rays. The greater portion of these destructive rays are filtered out
by a planet's ionosphere and upper atmosphere.”

Thus, it is not so much a matter of the strength of
the Sun’s radiation at a certain distance that determines the heat and light
that manifests on a planet’s surface. Rather, it is the density of a planet’s
atmosphere that determines the ability of a planet to make use of the radiation
that reaches them to produce heat and light.

And we’ve seen a lot of evidence to the fact that the
Moon and Mars, for example, have atmospheres. Mars has enough of an atmosphere to
life up dust storms that cover the entire planet.

Martian Atmosphere: http://www.holloworbs.com/july.htm

Lunar atmosphere: http://www.holloworbs.com/Lunar_Atmosphere.htm

Enough atmosphere to support trees on Mars:

http://www.holloworbs.com/moc_narrow.htm

It’s amazing, it’s incredible!

Dean