Members,
Here is a stretch from " You Could Learn a Lot from a Daitya." I re-wrote the last paragraph reproduced here, beginning with " If however..."
Here the guide is explaining that huge caverns and cavities deep within the Earth’s inner shell do not typically collapse due to the weight of the Earth above them because the effects of gravity diminish the deeper one penetrates.
On page 201 we can see that, the deeper the pair penetrated the Earth’s shell, the less exhaustive was simple movement thanks to a diminuition of gravity:
“ ... we had been rapidly walking, or I should better say advancing, for we no longer walked as men do, but skipped down into the Earth, down, ever downward. ... I was sensible of a marked decrease of muscular energy required to carry us onward, and I realized that my body was quite exempt from weariness. Motion became restful instead of exhausting, and it seemed to me that the ratio of the loss of weight, as shown by our free movements, in proportion to the distance we traversed, was greater than formerly. The slightest exhibition of propelling force cast us rapidly forward. Instead of the laborious, short step of upper earth, a single leap would carry us many yards. A slight spring, and with our bodies in space, we would skip several rods, alighting gently, to move again as easily. I marveled, for, although I had been led to anticipate something unusual, the practical evidence was wonderfully impressive, and I again questioned my guide.
We are now nearing what physicists would call the center of gravity," he replied, arid our weight is rapidly diminishing. This is in exact accordance with the laws that govern the force called gravitation, which, at the earth's surface, is apparently uniform, though no instrument known to man can demonstrate its exact variation ... as we descend into the Earth.”
Only two kinds of people would take stock in the above descriptions- incurably eccentric people and people familiar with the subtle workings of nature, particularly soft particle physics. According to Joseph H. Cater’s soft particle presentation, gravity is not caused by the density of mass as there are examples which don’t correspond to this scheme; for example, the largest bodies in our atmosphere and solar system, clouds and the Sun. Clouds don’t fall although they are possessed of much denser mass than the surrounding air, and neither the viscosity of air nor air resistence explain this phenomenon. The sun is deemed to be such a source of gravity due to its mass that it is able to keep all the planets in its orbit, though the Sun exerts paucious influence over the tides while the Moon’s influence is overwhelming. The sun is further away than the Moon although it is much more massive; if it is able to keep the Moon and Earth in orbit from such a distance, what to speak of larger and more distant planets, then it should be able to exert significant influence over the tides also. But it does not. These two examples involving the largest objects visible to humans demonstrate that gravity is not caused by mass.
If, however, we give a chance to the idea that gravity effects are brought about by an electromagnetic radiation, then the above descriptions from Etidorhpa acquire new meaning. This concept has been better developed in our essay entitled Clouds Don’t Fall, but it suffices to say that such an electromagnetic radiation would not be able to penetrate uniformly, nor 100%, through Earth’s shell; at different depths there would be further transformations of frequency and thus the gravity-inducing frequency would experience frequencies that impede its passage in strata further down. In this way, gravity would diminish the further down one penetrated, giving rise to the experiences related by The Man.