About.com http--gedds.pfrr.alaska.edu-aurora-english-intro1.htm Northern and Southern Auroras

This document contains frames, which cannot be edited. The original document is attached.

ATT00018.htm (1.39 KB)

Ralph,

Nice pics of the aurora. Cater says that they are caused by low frequency particles from within which follow the magnetic lines of force outwards. According to Cater, the magnetic lines of force don't exactly envelope the Earth like a canopy, rather, they snake along closer to the ground and cause typical air currents. In the pictures you can see how the aurora are following a snaking pattern.

You don't see the auroral display below a certain level, though- there is nothing below the display. Below that level the low frequency nature of the particles is camouflaging the radiation, and where the display is visible is the level where the visible particles were liberated.

Cater's explanation of the aurora negates any need to invent the participation of particles which arrive directly from the sun and establishes the inner sun as a source in a way that appeals to sensible logic and with congruency.

Dharma/Dean

···

----- Original Message -----

From:
Ralph McCormick

To: [email protected]

Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 7:35 PM

Subject: [allplanets-hollow] About.com http--gedds.pfrr.alaska.edu-aurora-english-intro1.htm Northern and Southern Auroras

This document contains frames, which cannot be edited. The original document is attached.

` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

`

Dean: I am not sure witch photo you were refering to. I try to send only the most interesting photos that I find. I was trying to send a photo from this same site when my computer froze up. I have been having this problem since I bought my computer. It's an Athlon 850 MHZ and I bought it from CA. I have very poor tech support in correcting this. I was told that it might be because of a slotted micro chip and that it is a common problem in the Athlon processor. I don't think it is a virus since it has been doing this since I bought it. Anyway there was a photo showing the Aurora at the north and south pole on this one photo and it was taken from the Pacific. I thought this was unusual since most photos are from either the north or south pole. I believe if the interior sun is the cause for this that the interior sun should be shining out both poles all the time. The only time that we can't see the aurora is when it is obstructed by sunlight. I was sending this photo when my computer froze. From: Ralph

···

----- Original Message -----

From:
Dean

To: [email protected]

Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 6:48 AM

Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Nice aurora pics

Ralph,

Nice pics of the aurora. Cater says that they are caused by low frequency particles from within which follow the magnetic lines of force outwards. According to Cater, the magnetic lines of force don't exactly envelope the Earth like a canopy, rather, they snake along closer to the ground and cause typical air currents. In the pictures you can see how the aurora are following a snaking pattern.

You don't see the auroral display below a certain level, though- there is nothing below the display. Below that level the low frequency nature of the particles is camouflaging the radiation, and where the display is visible is the level where the visible particles were liberated.

Cater's explanation of the aurora negates any need to invent the participation of particles which arrive directly from the sun and establishes the inner sun as a source in a way that appeals to sensible logic and with congruency.

Dharma/Dean

----- Original Message -----

From:
Ralph McCormick

To: [email protected]

Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 7:35 PM

Subject: [allplanets-hollow] About.com http--gedds.pfrr.alaska.edu-aurora-english-intro1.htm Northern and Southern Auroras

This document contains frames, which cannot be edited. The original document is attached.

` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

`

` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

`

Ralph,

I know what you mean about computer problems. Three weeks ago I ended up having my hard drive reformatted, and lost more time in relation to the problem than you would imagine. I am still struggling with graphics programs. I am trying to shrink photos and mark maps and save them with the marks. I can do it on the screen, but I can't save anything. When I call things back up, they come back the same old way. Last week I threw away hours installing Corel Draw and experimenting with it, but the result is the same. I had been using Photo Suite.

Yesterday I finished up an article that I was working on about Etidorhpa ( I have sent some tidbits ), so I have been away from the list more than I would like.

Anyway, you made the following point: " I believe if the interior sun is the cause for this that the interior sun should be shining out both poles all the time. The only time that we can't see the aurora is when it is obstructed by sunlight."

Well, I still don't think that you are picking up on Cater's concept, which I have presented, on the nature of the inner sun's rays. Let me say the following:

  • That the inner sun is, in fact, shining out of the orifice at all times, but the rays are NOT visible to our eyesight.
  • Also, that the aurora is caused by the rays of the inner sun and IS visible to our eyesight.

You also said that the only time we can't see the aurora is when it is obstructed by sunlight. Ok, but we also can't see the aurora when it isn't there.

How are all of these seeming incongruencies reconciled? By Mr. Cater, and I'm not kidding; I hope that you don't think that I am a fanatic. The explanation goes like this- Low frequency, invisible rays are always shining out of the polar orifices. By low frequency is meant mixed frequencies, really, because such invisible radiation also contains invisible light which has its properties camouflaged. So even though the light of the inner sun is always shining out of the orifice, it is not visible.

It does become visible when sunspot activity causes a buildup of low frequency particles within the inner cavity. The rays then spurt out of the polar orifices with such intensity that the particles then break up and release light in the visible band, usually high up in the atmosphere, thus causing the auroral display.

So the invisible shining which is always emanating from the polar orifice and the shining which causes the auroral display is the same, it is just that, in the case of the display, visible light is released.

I mentioned that sunspot activity causes the buildup of low frequency particles in the inner cavity. These charged ( but low frequency ) particles do not enter through the polar openings to any appreciable, "causative" extent. They seep, or rather flow through the shell of the Earth- low frequency particles can do that, the visible light of the sun cannot.

I'll close by saying that if you are looking for some kind of empiric evidence of the inner sun, such as its shining through the orifices, you would have to use some kind of low frequency instrumentation. Until now, no satellites have employed such instrumentation.

I don't want to appear arrogant about all this, I just want to reciprocate with you because I feel that your comprehension and collaboration are valuable.

Later,

Dharma/Dean